| Literature DB >> 25890028 |
Hui Zhang1, Hongli Gao2, Chengli Liu3, Yalin Kong4, Cheng Wang5, Hongyi Zhang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It has been shown that heat shock-related 70-kDa protein 2 (HSPA2), a member of the HSP70 family of heat shock proteins, is important for cancer cell growth and metastasis. However, the status of HSPA2 expression and its prognostic significance in pancreatic cancer remain unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25890028 PMCID: PMC4383074 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-015-0253-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Association between HSPA2 mRNA expression and clinicopathological features of pancreatic cancer
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Age (years) | 0.484 | |||
| <60 | 43 | 21 (48.8) | 22 (51.2) | |
| ≥60 | 61 | 28 (44.3) | 33 (54.1) | |
| Gender | 0.396 | |||
| Male | 82 | 37 (45.1) | 45 (54.9) | |
| Female | 22 | 12 (54.5) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.024 | |||
| <2 | 47 | 32 (68.1) | 15 (31.9) | |
| ≥2 | 57 | 17 (29.8) | 40 (70.2) | |
| Histological grades | 0.012 | |||
| Well/Moderate | 56 | 32 (57.0) | 24 (43.0) | |
| Poor | 48 | 17 (35.4) | 31 (64.6) | |
| TNM stagea | 0.006 | |||
| IA-IB | 66 | 35 (53.0) | 31 (47.0) | |
| IIA-IIB | 38 | 14 (36.8) | 24 (63.2) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.043 | |||
| No | 75 | 39 (48.0) | 36 (52.0) | |
| Yes | 29 | 10 (44.8) | 19 (55.2) | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.062 | |||
| No | 80 | 39 (48.8) | 41 (51.2) | |
| Yes | 24 | 10 (41.7) | 14 (58.3) | |
| CA19-9 (U/ml) | 0.046 | |||
| <27 | 27 | 14 (51.9) | 13 (48.1) | |
| ≥27 | 77 | 35 (45.5) | 42 (54.5) | |
| Bilirubin (μmol/l) | 0.178 | |||
| <17.1 | 35 | 16 (45.7) | 19 (54.3) | |
| ≥17.1 | 69 | 33 (47.8) | 36 (52.3) | |
aTNM staging was classified according to the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual.
HSPA2, Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2.
Figure 1Relative expression of HSPA2 in 104 pairs of pancreatic cancer tissues (C) and adjacent normal tissues (N).
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for high HSPA2 mRNA expression level versus low HSPA2 mRNA expression level in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in patients with pancreatic cancer
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| Age at diagnosis (years) | |||
| <60 vs. ≥60 | 0.584 | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male vs. Female | 0.763 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | |||
| <2 vs. ≥2 | 0.082 | ||
| Histological grades | |||
| Well/Moderate vs. Poor | 0.067 | ||
| TNM stagea | |||
| IA-IB vs. IIA-IIB | 0.013 | 1.23 (1.14-1.52) | 0.026 |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| No vs. Yes | 0.040 | 1.14 (0.97-1.41) | 0.054 |
| Vascular invasion | |||
| No vs. Yes | 0.017 | 1.27 (1.04-1.49) | 0.042 |
| CA19-9 (U/ml) | |||
| <27 vs. ≥27 | 0.082 | ||
| Bilirubin (μmol/l) | |||
| <17.1 vs. ≥17.1 | 0.185 | ||
| HSPA2 mRNA expression | |||
| Low vs. High | 0.007 | 1.58 (1.11-1.89) | 0.011 |
aTNM staging was classified according to the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual.
HSPA2, Heat shock-related 70 kDa protein 2.