Literature DB >> 25889607

Dosimetry methods for multi-detector computed tomography.

M Gancheva1, I Dyakov2, J Vassileva2, S Avramova-Cholakova2, D Taseva2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare four dosimetry methods for wide-beam multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in terms of computed tomography dose index free in air (CTDI free-in-air) and CTDI measured in phantom (CTDI phantom). The study was performed with Aquilion One 320-detector row CT (Toshiba), Ingenuity 64-detector row CT (Philips) and Aquilion 64 64-detector row CT (Toshiba). In addition to the standard dosimetry, three other dosimetry methods were also applied. The first method, suggested by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for MDCT, includes free-in-air measurements with a standard 100-mm CT pencil ion chamber, stepped through the X-ray beam, along the z-axis, at intervals equal to its sensitive length. Two cases were studied-with an integration length of 200 mm and with a standard polimetil metakrilat (PMMA) dosimetry phantom. The second approach comprised measurements with a twice-longer phantom and two 100-mm chambers positioned and fixed against each other, forming a detection length of 200 mm. As a third method, phantom measurements were performed to study the real-dose profile along z-axis using thermoluminescent detectors. Fabricated PMMA tube of a total length of 300 mm in cylindrical shape containing LiF detectors was used. CTDI free-in-air measured with an integration length of 300 mm for 160 mm wide beam was by 194 % higher than the same quantity measured using the standard method. For an integration length of 200 mm, the difference was 18 % for 40 mm wide beam and 14 % for 32 mm wide beam in comparison with the standard CTDI measurement. For phantom measurements, the IEC method resulted in difference of 41 % for the beam width 160 mm, 19 % for the beam width 40 mm and 18 % for the beam width 32 mm compared with the method for CTDI vol. CTDI values from direct measurement in the phantom central hole with two chambers differ by 20 % from the calculated values by the IEC method. Dose profile for beam widths of 40, 32 and 16 mm, and analysis and conclusions are presented.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25889607     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  4 in total

1.  Dose and slice thickness evaluation with nMAG gel dosimeters in computed tomography.

Authors:  Chun-Chao Chuang; Jay Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Assessment of Effective Dose Associated with Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Isfahan Province, Iran.

Authors:  Mohammadbagher Tavakoli; Reihane Faraji; Zahra Alirezaei; Zohre Nateghian
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

3.  Assessment of volumetric absorbed dose for mobile fluoroscopic 3D image acquisition.

Authors:  Stephanie Leon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 4.  Cumulative radiation doses from recurrent PET-CT examinations.

Authors:  Makoto Hosono; Mamoru Takenaka; Hajime Monzen; Mikoto Tamura; Masatoshi Kudo; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.