| Literature DB >> 25888447 |
Joshua A Hirsch1, Laxmaiah Manchikanti2,3, Felipe C Albuquerque4, Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi1, Michael H Lev5, Italo Linfante6, J Mocco7, Ansaar T Rai8, Pamela W Schaefer5, Robert W Tarr9.
Abstract
Peer review of scientific articles submitted for publication has been such an integral component of innovation in science and medicine that participants (be they readers, reviewers, or editors) seldom consider its complexity. Not surprisingly, much has been written about scientific peer review. The aim of this report is to share some of the elements of that discourse with readers of the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS). Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.Entities:
Keywords: Standards
Mesh：
Year: 2015 PMID： 25888447 DOI： 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurointerv Surg ISSN： 1759-8478 Impact factor: 5.836