| Literature DB >> 25886970 |
Claudia A Sevillano1,2, Marcos S Lopes3,4, Barbara Harlizius5, Egiel H A T Hanenberg6, Egbert F Knol7, John W M Bastiaansen8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptorchidism and scrotal/inguinal hernia are the most frequent congenital defects in pigs. Identification of genomic regions that control these congenital defects is of great interest to breeding programs, both from an animal welfare point of view as well as for economic reasons. The aim of this genome-wide association study (GWAS) was to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are strongly associated with these congenital defects. Genotypes were available for 2570 Large White (LW) and 2272 Landrace (LR) pigs. Breeding values were estimated based on 1 359 765 purebred and crossbred male offspring, using a binary trait animal model. Estimated breeding values were deregressed (DEBV) and taken as the response variable in the GWAS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25886970 PMCID: PMC4367917 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0096-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Sel Evol ISSN: 0999-193X Impact factor: 4.297
Mean incidence (%) of cryptorchidism and hernia per sow line and litter type
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Large White | Purebred | 0.974 | 0.426 |
| Crossbred | 0.260 | 0.066 | |
| Combined | 0.415 | 0.144 | |
| Landrace | Purebred | 0.352 | 0.551 |
| Crossbred | 0.338 | 0.252 | |
| Combined | 0.342 | 0.331 | |
| Overall | 0.386 | 0.217 | |
Additive genetic variance ( ), common litter effect (c 2 ) and heritability (h 2 ) for cryptorchidism and hernia
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Hernia | 1.69 (0.09) | 0.53 (0.06) | 0.31 (0.01) |
| Cryptorchidism | 1.41 (0.11) | 0.64 (0.08) | 0.26 (0.02) |
Standard errors are in parenthesis; effects are under an underlying logistic scale.
Figure 1Association between cryptorchidism and 38 632 genome-wide SNPs in a Large White pig population. Each dot represents one SNP; on the y-axis are -log10(P-values) and on the x-axis are the physical positions of the SNPs by chromosome; blue dots represents SNPs that surpassed the FDR ≤ 0.20 threshold.
Figure 2Association between cryptorchidism and 39 508 genome-wide SNPs in a Landrace pig population. Each dot represents one SNP; on the y-axis are -log10(P-values), and on the x-axis are the physical positions of the SNPs by chromosome; blue dots represents SNPs that surpassed the FDR ≤ 0.20 threshold.
QTL regions associated with cryptorchidism in the Large White population
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SSC2 | 16.15 - 16.17 | 2 | 0.96 |
| SSC8 | 43.93 | 1 | 1.06 |
| SSC8 | 64.95 – 84.44 | 12 | 1.07 |
| SC10 | 25.28 | 1 | 0.98 |
| SSC13 | 77.69 - 79.80 | 4 | 1.09 |
| SSC14 | 11.37 | 1 | 0.99 |
| SSC14 | 96.99 | 1 | 1.10 |
Significant association using a FDR ≤ 0.20; proportion (%) of the phenotypic variance explained by the most significant SNP per QTL region.
QTL regions associated with cryptorchidism in the Landrace population
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SSC1 | 297.27 – 297.77 | 4 | 1.86 |
| SSC3 | 124.83 | 1 | 2.08 |
| SSC4 | 26.06 - 26.11 | 2 | 2.03 |
| SSC4 | 75.99 – 79.65 | 15 | 1.01 |
| SSC5 | 34.07 | 1 | 1.18 |
| SSC6 | 86.23 | 2 | 1.25 |
| SSC6 | 30.24 | 1 | 0.79 |
| SSC6 | 3.66 | 1 | 2.34 |
| SSC7 | 31.30 | 1 | 1.53 |
| SSC7 | 51.03 | 1 | 1.41 |
| SSC7 | 71.81 – 74.94 | 9 | 2.30 |
| SSC8 | 3.61 – 3.82 | 2 | 1.49 |
| SSC8 | 34.81- 36.22 | 2 | 1.70 |
| SSC8 | 60.77 – 72.81 | 16 | 2.23 |
| SSC8 | 87.00 | 1 | 1.39 |
| SSC8 | 121.33 | 1 | 1.04 |
| SSC9 | 137.13 – 144.94 | 2 | 1.74 |
| SSC10 | 37.87 | 1 | 1.21 |
| SSC10 | 54.50 – 55.68 | 3 | 2.77 |
| SSC10 | 76.17 | 1 | 1.37 |
| SSC11 | 2.68 – 13.27 | 3 | 1.24 |
| SSC11 | 53.48 | 1 | 2.10 |
| SSC13 | 17.67 | 1 | 1.46 |
| SSC13 | 200.75 – 201.80 | 3 | 0.71 |
| SSC14 | 15.42 | 1 | 2.04 |
| SSC14 | 120.99 | 1 | 1.24 |
| SSC15 | 15.08 | 1 | 1.59 |
| SSC15 | 82.48 | 1 | 1.20 |
| SSC16 | 47.25 – 49.84 | 2 | 0.48 |
| SSC17 | 24.01 | 1 | 1.13 |
| SSC18 | 28.17 | 1 | 1.09 |
Significant association using a FDR ≤ 0.20; proportion (%) of the phenotypic variance explained by the most significant SNP per QTL region.
Figure 3Association between hernia and 38 632 genome-wide SNPs in a Large White pig population. Each dot represents one SNP; on the y-axis are -log10(P-values), and on the x-axis are the physical positions of the SNPs by chromosome; blue dots represents SNPs that surpassed the FDR ≤ 0.20 threshold.
Figure 4Association between hernia and 39 508 genome-wide SNPs in a Landrace pig population. Each dot represents one SNP; on the y-axis are -log10(P-values), and on the x-axis are the physical positions of the SNPs by chromosome; blue dots represents SNPs that surpassed the FDR ≤ 0.20 threshold.
QTL regions associated with hernia in the Large White population
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SSC3 | 104.46 - 104.54 | 2 | 1.29 |
| SSC5 | 5.04 – 5.36 | 4 | 1.22 |
| SSC7 | 53.76 – 54.48 | 2 | 1.60 |
| SSC8 | 119.72 | 1 | 1.31 |
| SSC13 | 34.53 | 1 | 1.23 |
Significant association using a FDR ≤ 0.20; proportion (%) of the phenotypic variance explained by the most significant SNP per QTL region.
QTL regions associated with hernia in the Landrace population
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SSC1 | 162.16 – 162.80 | 3 | 1.41 |
| SSC2 | 155.44 | 1 | 1.15 |
| SSC4 | 53.96 – 71.57 | 5 | 1.46 |
| SSC10 | 13.96 | 1 | 1.18 |
| SSC13 | 33.62 – 37.15 | 12 | 1.26 |
Significant association using a FDR ≤ 0.20; proportion (%) of the phenotypic variance explained by the most significant SNP per QTL region.