| Literature DB >> 25885910 |
Olfa Saidi1, Martin O'Flaherty2, Nadia Ben Mansour3, Wafa Aissi4, Olfa Lassoued5, Simon Capewell6, Julia A Critchley7, Dhafer Malouche8, Habiba Ben Romdhane9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most projections of type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevalence are simply based on demographic change (i.e. ageing). We developed a model to predict future trends in T2D prevalence in Tunisia, explicitly taking into account trends in major risk factors (obesity and smoking). This could improve assessment of policy options for prevention and health service planning.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25885910 PMCID: PMC4348374 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1416-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1The type 2 diabetes model structure.
Data sources
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| • National Institute of Statistics in Tunisia |
|
| |
| Mortality Causes | • National Public Health Institute |
| Total Mortality | • National Institute of Statistics in Tunisia [ |
|
| • Tunisian National Nutrition Survey 1996/97 |
| • Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention Research Laboratory | |
|
| • Tunisian National Nutrition Survey 1996/97 |
| • Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention Research Laboratory | |
|
| • National Institute of Public Health in 1996/1997 |
| • Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention Research Laboratory | |
|
| Verona Study |
|
| DISMOD |
Tunisian population aged 25 years and above, obesity and smoking prevalence trends by gender and age groups in 1997 and 2005
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 25-34 | 733 | 751 | 8.0 | 6.8 | 58.8 | 0.9 | 4.9 | 17.3 | 798 | 849 | 13.9 | 9.2 | 50.0 | 6.8 | 7.3 | 17.3 |
| 35-44 | 549 | 546 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 49.7 | 1.9 | 11.3 | 28.8 | 671 | 706 | 15.9 | 11.8 | 53.8 | 2.6 | 14.4 | 33.7 |
| 45-54 | 318 | 329 | 15.6 | 13.6 | 43.4 | 2.0 | 8.3 | 38.8 | 522 | 516 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 47.0 | 2.0 | 20.4 | 45.5 |
| 55-64 | 261 | 264 | 18.4 | 21.0 | 33.4 | 2.0 | 7.4 | 32.5 | 282 | 299 | 22.6 | 21.9 | 42.4 | 2.0 | 17.0 | 35.2 |
| 65-74 | 174 | 201 | 15.3 | 22.2 | 33.4 | 1.4 | 8.2 | 25.9 | 226 | 225 | 16.9 | 21.3 | 26.2 | 2.2 | 10.4 | 28.1 |
| 75+ | 90 | 85 | 23.5 | 26.4 | 33.6 | 0.9 | 10.0 | 15.7 | 126 | 119 | 18.7 | 16.8 | 18.8 | 1.4 | 10.0 | 19.9 |
| Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*M: Men.
**W: Women.
N: Number.
Figure 2Estimated prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
Scenario projection rate of prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) by gender with sensitivity analysis (Minimum-Maximum)
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 22.3 (18.7-25.0) | 17.0 (14.7-19.2) | 19.6 (16.6-22.0) |
| 2020 | 24.1 (20.6-26.6) | 18.6 (16.2-20.6) | 21.3 (18.4-23.5) |
| 2027 | 26.1 (23.0-27.7) | 20.6 (18.6-22.2) | 23.2 (20.7-24.9) |
The type 2 diabetes model structure.
Figure 3Comparison of model and observed estimates for type 2 diabetes prevalence by gender: Tunisia 1997 and 2005.