Sarah C Tinker1, Heather C Hamner2, Yan Ping Qi1, Krista S Crider1. 1. National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia. 2. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations are a potential biomarker of folate-sensitive neural tube defect (NTD) risk in the population. The purpose of this analysis was to describe women in the U.S. population with RBC folate concentrations below those associated with optimal NTD prevention. METHODS: We used data from the 2007 to 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to assess the RBC folate status of U.S. women of childbearing age relative to risk categories for NTD risk based on RBC folate concentrations. We defined suboptimal RBC folate concentrations as those associated with a prevalence of ≥9 NTDs per 10,000 live births. RESULTS: Among nonpregnant women age 12 to 49 years, 22.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 21.1, 24.6) had suboptimal RBC folate concentrations. Women had greater odds of having a suboptimal RBC folate concentration if they did not use dietary supplements containing folic acid; had mandatorily fortified enriched cereal grain products as their only source of folic acid; were non-Hispanic black or Hispanic; or were current smokers. CONCLUSION: Based on RBC folate concentrations, we would predict that the majority of U.S. women of reproductive age are not at increased risk for folate sensitive NTDs in the presence of mandatory folic acid fortification. Prevention policies and programs can be aimed at population subgroups identified as having higher predicted risk for folate-sensitive NTDs based on RBC folate concentrations.
BACKGROUND:Red blood cell (RBC) folate concentrations are a potential biomarker of folate-sensitive neural tube defect (NTD) risk in the population. The purpose of this analysis was to describe women in the U.S. population with RBC folate concentrations below those associated with optimal NTD prevention. METHODS: We used data from the 2007 to 2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to assess the RBC folate status of U.S. women of childbearing age relative to risk categories for NTD risk based on RBC folate concentrations. We defined suboptimal RBC folate concentrations as those associated with a prevalence of ≥9 NTDs per 10,000 live births. RESULTS: Among nonpregnant women age 12 to 49 years, 22.8% (95% Confidence Interval: 21.1, 24.6) had suboptimal RBC folate concentrations. Women had greater odds of having a suboptimal RBC folate concentration if they did not use dietary supplements containing folic acid; had mandatorily fortified enriched cereal grain products as their only source of folic acid; were non-Hispanic black or Hispanic; or were current smokers. CONCLUSION: Based on RBC folate concentrations, we would predict that the majority of U.S. women of reproductive age are not at increased risk for folate sensitive NTDs in the presence of mandatory folic acid fortification. Prevention policies and programs can be aimed at population subgroups identified as having higher predicted risk for folate-sensitive NTDs based on RBC folate concentrations.
Authors: Mark A Canfield; Margaret A Honein; Nataliya Yuskiv; Jian Xing; Cara T Mai; Julianne S Collins; Owen Devine; Joann Petrini; Tunu A Ramadhani; Charlotte A Hobbs; Russell S Kirby Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2006-11
Authors: Bridget S Mosley; Mario A Cleves; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Gary M Shaw; Mark A Canfield; D Kim Waller; Martha M Werler; Charlotte A Hobbs Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Quan-He Yang; Lorenzo D Botto; Margaret Gallagher; J M Friedman; Christopher L Sanders; Deborah Koontz; Stanimila Nikolova; J David Erickson; Karen Steinberg Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jorge Rosenthal; Natalia Largaespada; Lynn B Bailey; Michael Cannon; C J Alverson; Dayrin Ortiz; Gail Pa Kauwell; Joe Sniezek; Ramon Figueroa; Robyn Daly; Peter Allen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; David A Lacher; Rosemary L Schleicher; Clifford L Johnson; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Marisa A Ryan; Andrew F Olshan; Mark A Canfield; Adrienne T Hoyt; Angela E Scheuerle; Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Martha M Werler; Sarah C Fisher; Tania A Desrosiers Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 1.675
Authors: Todd P Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Joseph L Wiemels; Amanda W Singer; Mark D Miller Journal: Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care Date: 2016-10