Literature DB >> 11441393

Effect of rearfoot orthotics on postural sway after lateral ankle sprain.

J Hertel1, C R Denegar, W E Buckley, N A Sharkey, W L Stokes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different rearfoot orthotics on postural sway during unilateral stance after lateral ankle sprain.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures 3-factor analysis of variance on postural sway length and velocity in the frontal and sagittal planes with factors being stance leg (injured, uninjured), session (within 3 d, 2 wk, 4 wk postinjury), and condition (6 orthotic conditions).
SETTING: University biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS: Fifteen collegiate athletes with acute, unilateral first- or second-degree lateral ankle sprain.
INTERVENTIONS: Balance testing was performed under 6 conditions: (1) shoe only, (2) molded Aquaplast orthotic, (3) lateral heel wedge, (4) 7 degrees medially posted orthotic, (5) 4 degrees laterally posted orthotic, and (6) neutral orthotic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postural sway length and postural sway velocity in the frontal and sagittal planes.
RESULTS: Significant main effects were found for side and session, but not orthotic condition, for all 4 dependent variables. Postural sway length and velocity were greater on the injured limbs as compared with the uninjured limbs during the first 2 sessions but not during the third session. None of the orthotics significantly reduced postural sway compared with the shoe-only condition after lateral ankle sprain.
CONCLUSIONS: Rearfoot orthotics, irrespective of design or posting, were ineffective at improving postural sway after lateral ankle sprain. Copyright 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11441393     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.22349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation of ligamentous ankle injuries: a review of recent studies.

Authors:  C Zöch; V Fialka-Moser; M Quittan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Effect of forefoot type on postural stability - a cross sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Guru Karthikeyan; Shamjibhai Jadav Jayraj; Venkatesan Narayanan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

3.  Static stretching does not alter pre and post-landing muscle activation.

Authors:  Wesley R Moss; J Brent Feland; Iain Hunter; J Ty Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-05-13

4.  Orthotic intervention and postural stability in participants with functional ankle instability after an accommodation period.

Authors:  Chris Hamlyn; Carrie L Docherty; Joanne Klossner
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Differences in Postural Control During Single-Leg Stance Among Healthy Individuals With Different Foot Types.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Michael R Gay; Craig R Denegar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Functional Anatomy, Pathomechanics, and Pathophysiology of Lateral Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Standing balance on the ground -the influence of flatfeet and insoles.

Authors:  Yuichi Takata; Shinji Matsuoka; Nobuhisa Okumura; Koji Iwamoto; Mitsugu Takahashi; Eiichi Uchiyama
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-01-08

8.  The effectiveness of rearfoot medial wedge intervention on balance for athletes with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Hsiao-Yun Chang; Yun-Chi Chang; Shih-Chung Cheng; Chun-Hou Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Effect of Chronic Ankle Sprain on Pain, Range of Motion, Proprioception, and Balance among Athletes.

Authors:  Ahmad H Alghadir; Zaheen A Iqbal; Amir Iqbal; Hashim Ahmed; Swapnil U Ramteke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.