Literature DB >> 25883867

Biomechanical loads during common rehabilitation exercises in obese individuals.

Bhupinder Singh1, H John Yack2, Shelby L Francis3, Kathleen F Janz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Squats and lunges are commonly prescribed rehabilitation exercises used to improve performance across a wide spectrum of patient populations. However, biomechanical studies have mainly examined young, normal weight populations performing these exercises at a difficulty level potentially too challenging for obese individuals. Understanding how obesity and different levels of difficulty affect lower extremity biomechanics could help to inform rehabilitation approaches used for obese individuals.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the lower extremity kinematics and kinetics in obese and normal weight females during performance of progressively more difficult squat and lunge exercises. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design.
METHODS: Ten obese females (mean age, 37.4 years; BMI 39.2 ± 3.7 kg/m(2)) and ten normal-weight, age-matched female controls (38.1 years, BMI < 23 kg/m(2)) volunteered for the study. Each group performed two exercises, each in three different iterations: squatting at three standardized knee angles (60°, 70°, and 80°) and lunging at three standardized distances (1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 times tibial length). Three dimensional motion analysis using infrared markers and force plates was used to calculate range of motion as well as hip, knee, ankle and support moments (normalized for body weight). A repeated measures ANOVA model was used to determine between and within group differences.
RESULTS: Support moments were higher in obese females for squat 70° (p=0.03) and 80° (p=0.01). Ankle extensor moments were higher in obese females for squat 80° (p=0.04). During lunge at all levels (1.0, 1.1, and 1.2), hip extensor moments were higher in obese subjects (p=0.004, 0.003, and 0.007 respectively). Within group, the support moments were significantly higher during squat 80° than squat 60° (p=0.01) in obese females. A non-linear relationship was found between hip moments and BMI during squat 60°, 70°, and 80°.
CONCLUSION: During two commonly prescribed rehabilitation exercises (squat and lunge), there were significantly greater support moments in obese individuals compared to normal controls. The non-linear associations between kinetic and anthropometric measures make the assessment of how best to approach exercise in obese individuals challenging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; lunge; obesity; physical therapy; squat

Year:  2015        PMID: 25883867      PMCID: PMC4387726     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  25 in total

1.  Patellofemoral joint kinetics while squatting with and without an external load.

Authors:  David A Wallace; George J Salem; Ruben Salinas; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Squatting exercises in older adults: kinematic and kinetic comparisons.

Authors:  Sean Flanagan; George J Salem; Man-Ying Wang; Serena E Sanker; Gail A Greendale
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Validity and comparisons of tibiofemoral orientations and displacement using a femoral tracking device during early to mid stance of walking.

Authors:  Jeff Houck; H John Yack; Tyler Cuddeford
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data.

Authors:  Michael H Schwartz; Adam Rozumalski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Forward lunge: a training study of eccentric exercises of the lower limbs.

Authors:  Sven Jönhagen; Paul Ackermann; Tönu Saartok
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  The effect of squat depth on multiarticular muscle activation in collegiate cross-country runners.

Authors:  Joshua Gorsuch; Janey Long; Katie Miller; Kyle Primeau; Sarah Rutledge; Andrew Sossong; John J Durocher
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Efficacy of gait training with real-time biofeedback in correcting knee hyperextension patterns in young women.

Authors:  Patricia Teran-Yengle; Rebecca Birkhofer; Megan A Weber; Kimberly Patton; Erin Thatcher; H John Yack
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Association of dynamic joint power with functional limitations in older adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; H John Yack; Morgan Brubaker; James C Torner; Robert Wallace
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Bilateral kinematic and kinetic analysis of the squat exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  George J Salem; Ruben Salinas; F Victor Harding
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Biomechanical analysis of the anterior lunge during 4 external-load conditions.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Shelley Lapinski; Lyndsay Smith; George Davies
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.