Literature DB >> 25883866

Evaluation of a treatment algorithm for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a pilot study.

Mitchell Selhorst1, William Rice1, Todd Degenhart1, Michael Jackowski1, Melissa Tatman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) has been extensively studied in physical therapy literature. Patients with PFPS demonstrate quadriceps and hip musculature weakness, altered lower extremity (LE) kinematics, and decreased LE flexibility. Psychosocial factors have also been identified as an important factor in patients with PFPS. The authors hypothesize that an ordered approach addressing each of these impairments sequentially will result in greater improvement in PFPS symptoms. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of performing a randomized trial and to determine the sample size necessary to examine the validity of this hypothesis.
METHODS: Patients received a sequential treatment approach using a PFPS treatment algorithm (PFPS Algorithm) designed by the authors. Patients were evaluated assessing psychosocial factors, flexibility, LE kinematics, and LE strength. Impairments that were found in the evaluation were addressed sequentially over the episode of care. Patients were prescribed therapy two times per week for six weeks. Pain, Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), and Global Rating of Change (GROC) were measured at evaluation and discharge.
RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients with PFPS who were referred to physical therapy were enrolled in the pilot study. All phases of the feasibility study including recruitment, treatment protocols and data collection were effectively carried out. One hundred percent of patients treated with the PFPS algorithm who completed the prescribed treatment had a clinically significant improvement in the AKPS and GROC. A floor effect was noted with NPRS with 38% of patients unable to achieve clinically significant improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: With minor changes to the protocol and outcome measures used, a full randomized trial is feasible and merited. Steps must be taken to reduce the high drop-out rate among both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patellofemoral pain; knee pain; physical therapy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25883866      PMCID: PMC4387725     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  31 in total

1.  Intrinsic risk factors for the development of anterior knee pain in an athletic population. A two-year prospective study.

Authors:  E Witvrouw; R Lysens; J Bellemans; D Cambier; G Vanderstraeten
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.

Authors:  Marlies Noordzij; Giovanni Tripepi; Friedo W Dekker; Carmine Zoccali; Michael W Tanck; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Predictors of pain and function outcome after rehabilitation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Sara R Piva; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Stephen Wisniewski; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Fear-avoidance beliefs and parental responses to pain in adolescents with chronic pain.

Authors:  Anna C Wilson; Amy S Lewandowski; Tonya M Palermo
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement.

Authors:  Ying-Chih Wang; Dennis L Hart; Paul W Stratford; Jerome E Mioduski
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-03-03

Review 7.  Diagnosis and treatment of patients with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  John P Fulkerson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Prognostic factors for patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis.

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Kay M Crossley; Robbart L van Linschoten; Bill Vicenzino; Marienke van Middelkoop
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Validation of outcome measures in patients with patellofemoral syndrome.

Authors:  B M Chesworth; E Culham; G E Tata; M Peat
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?

Authors:  Kay M Crossley; Kim L Bennell; Sallie M Cowan; Sally Green
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  3 in total

1.  THE EFFECTS OF A MULTIMODAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM ON PAIN, KINESIOPHOBIA AND FUNCTION IN A RUNNER WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN.

Authors:  Samuele Passigli; Pietro Capacci; Emanuele Volpi
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

2.  Targeted Treatment Protocol in Patellofemoral Pain: Does Treatment Designed According to Subgroups Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients Unresponsive to Multimodal Treatment?

Authors:  Hayri Baran Yosmaoğlu; James Selfe; Emel Sonmezer; İlknur Ezgi Sahin; Senay Çerezci Duygu; Manolya Acar Ozkoslu; Jim Richards; Jessica Janssen
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Are there three main subgroups within the patellofemoral pain population? A detailed characterisation study of 127 patients to help develop targeted intervention (TIPPs).

Authors:  James Selfe; Jessie Janssen; Michael Callaghan; Erik Witvrouw; Chris Sutton; Jim Richards; Maria Stokes; Denis Martin; John Dixon; Russell Hogarth; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Elizabeth Ritchie; Nigel Arden; Paola Dey
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 13.800

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.