Benjamin M Kandel1, Brian B Avants2, James C Gee2, Steven E Arnold3, David A Wolk4. 1. Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory and Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory and Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychometric tests predict conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). Because the definition of clinical AD relies on those same psychometric tests, the ability of these tests to identify underlying AD pathology remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which psychometric testing predicts molecular evidence of AD amyloid pathology, as indicated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ)1 - 42, in patients with MCI, as compared to neuroimaging biomarkers. METHODS: We identified 408 MCI subjects with CSF Aβ levels, psychometric test data, FDG-PET scans, and acceptable volumetric MR scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We used psychometric tests and imaging biomarkers in univariate and multivariate models to predict Aβ status. RESULTS: The 30-min delayed recall score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test was the best predictor of Aβ status among the psychometric tests, achieving an AUC of 0.67 ± 0.02 and odds ratio of 2.5 ± 0.4. FDG-PET was the best imaging-based biomarker (AUC 0.67 ± 0.03, OR 3.2 ± 1.2), followed by hippocampal volume (AUC 0.64 ± 0.02, OR 2.4 ± 0.3). A multivariate analysis based on the psychometric tests improved on the univariate predictors, achieving an AUC of 0.68 ± 0.03 (OR 3.38 ± 1.2). Adding imaging biomarkers to the multivariate analysis did not improve the AUC. CONCLUSION: Psychometric tests perform as well as imaging biomarkers to predict presence of molecular markers of AD pathology in MCI patients and should be considered in the determination of the likelihood that MCI is due to AD.
BACKGROUND: Psychometric tests predict conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). Because the definition of clinical AD relies on those same psychometric tests, the ability of these tests to identify underlying AD pathology remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree to which psychometric testing predicts molecular evidence of AD amyloid pathology, as indicated by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ)1 - 42, in patients with MCI, as compared to neuroimaging biomarkers. METHODS: We identified 408 MCI subjects with CSF Aβ levels, psychometric test data, FDG-PET scans, and acceptable volumetric MR scans from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We used psychometric tests and imaging biomarkers in univariate and multivariate models to predict Aβ status. RESULTS: The 30-min delayed recall score of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test was the best predictor of Aβ status among the psychometric tests, achieving an AUC of 0.67 ± 0.02 and odds ratio of 2.5 ± 0.4. FDG-PET was the best imaging-based biomarker (AUC 0.67 ± 0.03, OR 3.2 ± 1.2), followed by hippocampal volume (AUC 0.64 ± 0.02, OR 2.4 ± 0.3). A multivariate analysis based on the psychometric tests improved on the univariate predictors, achieving an AUC of 0.68 ± 0.03 (OR 3.38 ± 1.2). Adding imaging biomarkers to the multivariate analysis did not improve the AUC. CONCLUSION: Psychometric tests perform as well as imaging biomarkers to predict presence of molecular markers of AD pathology in MCI patients and should be considered in the determination of the likelihood that MCI is due to AD.
Authors: Hilkka Runtti; Jussi Mattila; Mark van Gils; Juha Koikkalainen; Hilkka Soininen; Jyrki Lötjönen Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: K Kantarci; V Lowe; S A Przybelski; S D Weigand; M L Senjem; R J Ivnik; G M Preboske; R Roberts; Y E Geda; B F Boeve; D S Knopman; R C Petersen; C R Jack Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Dorene M Rentz; Mario A Parra Rodriguez; Rebecca Amariglio; Yaakov Stern; Reisa Sperling; Steven Ferris Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Michael Ewers; Matthias Brendel; Angela Rizk-Jackson; Axel Rominger; Peter Bartenstein; Norbert Schuff; Michael W Weiner Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kellen K Petersen; Richard B Lipton; Ellen Grober; Christos Davatzikos; Reisa A Sperling; Ali Ezzati Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Ali Ezzati; Danielle J Harvey; Christian Habeck; Ashkan Golzar; Irfan A Qureshi; Andrea R Zammit; Jinshil Hyun; Monica Truelove-Hill; Charles B Hall; Christos Davatzikos; Richard B Lipton Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Nikki H Stricker; Emily S Lundt; Sabrina M Albertson; Mary M Machulda; Shehroo B Pudumjee; Walter K Kremers; Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Benjamin M Kandel; Brian B Avants; James C Gee; Corey T McMillan; Guray Erus; Jimit Doshi; Christos Davatzikos; David A Wolk Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2016-04-07
Authors: Elena Tsoy; Amelia Strom; Leonardo Iaccarino; Sabrina J Erlhoff; Collette A Goode; Anne-Marie Rodriguez; Gil D Rabinovici; Bruce L Miller; Joel H Kramer; Katherine P Rankin; Renaud La Joie; Katherine L Possin Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Alice Hahn; Young Ju Kim; Hee Jin Kim; Hyemin Jang; Hanna Cho; Seong Hye Choi; Byeong C Kim; Kyung Won Park; Duk L Na; Juhee Chin; Sang Won Seo Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sebastian Palmqvist; Philip S Insel; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Britta Brix; Erik Stomrud; Niklas Mattsson; Oskar Hansson Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 21.566