OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between β-amyloid (Aβ) load as measured by [(11)C]-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET and cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults. METHODS: We studied 408 cognitively normal older adults who participated in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) from January 2009 through March 2011. The participants underwent PiB PET and neuropsychometric testing within 6 months. The association between PiB retention and cognitive function was measured by partial correlation and an interaction with APOE status was tested using linear regression after adjusting for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: Higher PiB retention was associated with cognitive performance (Spearman partial r = -0.18; p < 0.01), specifically the memory, language, attention/executive, and visual-spatial processing domains in the whole group of participants. The association between PiB retention and cognition was modified by the APOE status on linear regression analysis even after controlling for the differences in the distribution of PiB values among APOE ε4 carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.02). Cognitive performance was associated with the Aβ deposition in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe association cortices in APOE ε4 carriers on SPM analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a modest association between PiB retention and cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults and this relationship between Aβ load and cognitive function is modified by APOE status. Whereas Aβ load is associated with greater cognitive impairment in APOE ε4 carriers, the cognitive function in APOE ε4 noncarriers is influenced less by the Aβ load, suggesting that APOE isoforms modulate the harmful effects of Aβ on cognitive function.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between β-amyloid (Aβ) load as measured by [(11)C]-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET and cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults. METHODS: We studied 408 cognitively normal older adults who participated in the population-based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) from January 2009 through March 2011. The participants underwent PiB PET and neuropsychometric testing within 6 months. The association between PiB retention and cognitive function was measured by partial correlation and an interaction with APOE status was tested using linear regression after adjusting for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: Higher PiB retention was associated with cognitive performance (Spearman partial r = -0.18; p < 0.01), specifically the memory, language, attention/executive, and visual-spatial processing domains in the whole group of participants. The association between PiB retention and cognition was modified by the APOE status on linear regression analysis even after controlling for the differences in the distribution of PiB values among APOE ε4 carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.02). Cognitive performance was associated with the Aβ deposition in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe association cortices in APOE ε4 carriers on SPM analysis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a modest association between PiB retention and cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults and this relationship between Aβ load and cognitive function is modified by APOE status. Whereas Aβ load is associated with greater cognitive impairment in APOE ε4 carriers, the cognitive function in APOE ε4 noncarriers is influenced less by the Aβ load, suggesting that APOE isoforms modulate the harmful effects of Aβ on cognitive function.
Authors: V L Villemagne; K E Pike; D Darby; P Maruff; G Savage; S Ng; U Ackermann; T F Cowie; J Currie; S G Chan; G Jones; H Tochon-Danguy; G O'Keefe; C L Masters; C C Rowe Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Selam Negash; Pamela M Greenwood; Trey Sunderland; Raja Parasuraman; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Ronald C Petersen; Glenn E Smith Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kerryn E Pike; Greg Savage; Victor L Villemagne; Steven Ng; Simon A Moss; Paul Maruff; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Brain Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Prashanthi Vemuri; Jennifer L Whitwell; Kejal Kantarci; Keith A Josephs; Joseph E Parisi; Maria S Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Dennis W Dickson; Clifford R Jack Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Rashid Deane; Abhay Sagare; Katie Hamm; Margaret Parisi; Steven Lane; Mary Beth Finn; David M Holtzman; Berislav V Zlokovic Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-11-13 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: C C Rowe; S Ng; U Ackermann; S J Gong; K Pike; G Savage; T F Cowie; K L Dickinson; P Maruff; D Darby; C Smith; M Woodward; J Merory; H Tochon-Danguy; G O'Keefe; W E Klunk; C A Mathis; J C Price; C L Masters; V L Villemagne Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Matthew L Senjem; Stephen D Weigand; Bradley J Kemp; Maria M Shiung; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Brain Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Rosebud O Roberts; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Ruth H Cha; V Shane Pankratz; Bradley F Boeve; Robert J Ivnik; Eric G Tangalos; Ronald C Petersen; Walter A Rocca Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2008-02-07 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Howard Jay Aizenstein; Robert D Nebes; Judith A Saxton; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; Nicholas D Tsopelas; Scott K Ziolko; Jeffrey A James; Beth E Snitz; Patricia R Houck; Wenzhu Bi; Ann D Cohen; Brian J Lopresti; Steven T DeKosky; Edythe M Halligan; William E Klunk Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-11
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Stephen D Weigand; Heather J Wiste; Prashanthi Vemuri; Mary M Machulda; Davis S Knopman; Val Lowe; Rosebud O Roberts; Kejal Kantarci; Walter A Rocca; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: David A Merrill; Prabha Siddarth; Vladimir Kepe; Pushpa V Raja; Nathan Saito; Linda M Ercoli; Karen J Miller; Helen Lavretsky; Susan Y Bookheimer; Jorge R Barrio; Gary W Small Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Cynthia M Stonnington; Kewei Chen; Wendy Lee; Dona E C Locke; Amylou C Dueck; Xiaofen Liu; Auttawut Roontiva; Adam S Fleisher; Richard J Caselli; Eric M Reiman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Trey Hedden; Elizabeth C Mormino; Rebecca E Amariglio; Alayna P Younger; Aaron P Schultz; J Alex Becker; Randy L Buckner; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2012-11-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Clifford R Jack; Heather J Wiste; Timothy G Lesnick; Stephen D Weigand; David S Knopman; Prashanthi Vemuri; Vernon S Pankratz; Matthew L Senjem; Jeffrey L Gunter; Michelle M Mielke; Val J Lowe; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jacqueline E Maye; Rebecca A Betensky; Christopher M Gidicsin; Joseph Locascio; J Alex Becker; Lesley Pepin; Jeremy Carmasin; Dorene M Rentz; Gad A Marshall; Deborah Blacker; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-12-28 Impact factor: 4.673