| Literature DB >> 25878526 |
Mingsheng Yang1, Yalin Zhang1.
Abstract
Satyrinae is one of twelve subfamilies of the butterfly family Nymphalidae, which currently includes nine tribes. However, phylogenetic relationships among them remain largely unresolved, though different researches have been conducted based on both morphological and molecular data. However, ribosomal genes have never been used in tribe level phylogenetic analyses of Satyrinae. In this study we investigate for the first time the phylogenetic relationships among the tribes Elymniini, Amathusiini, Zetherini and Melanitini which are indicated to be a monophyletic group, and the Satyrini, using two ribosomal genes (28s rDNA and 16s rDNA) and four protein-coding genes (EF-1α, COI, COII and Cytb). We mainly aim to assess the phylogenetic informativeness of the ribosomal genes as well as clarify the relationships among different tribes. Our results show the two ribosomal genes generally have the same high phylogenetic informativeness compared with EF-1α; and we infer the 28s rDNA would show better informativeness if the 28s rDNA sequence data for each sampling taxon are obtained in this study. The placement of the monotypic genus Callarge Leech in Zetherini is confirmed for the first time based on molecular evidence. In addition, our maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) trees consistently show that the involved Satyrinae including the Amathusiini is monophyletic with high support values. Although the relationships among the five tribes are identical among ML and BI analyses and are mostly strongly-supported in BI analysis, those in ML analysis are lowly- or moderately- supported. Therefore, the relationships among the related five tribes recovered herein need further verification based on more sampling taxa.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian inference; Butterfly; Satyrinae; molecular systematics
Year: 2015 PMID: 25878526 PMCID: PMC4389127 DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.488.9171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zookeys ISSN: 1313-2970 Impact factor: 1.546
Samples used for molecular analyses in this study together with relevant information.
| Subfamily | Tribe | Species | Specimen voucher | Collecting locality | GenBank accession number | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| limyr1 | China: Yunnan, Jinghong | |||||||||
| dagen1 | China: Yunnan, Hekou | |||||||||
| pasit1 | China: Yunnan, Rili | |||||||||
| eumul | China: Yunnan, Lincang | |||||||||
| apili1 | China: Hunan, Zhangjiajie | |||||||||
| armer1 | China: Yunnan, Lincang | |||||||||
| cadav1 | China: Sichuan, Mt. Qingchengshan | n.a. | ||||||||
| chber1 | China: Yunnan, Hekou | n.a. | ||||||||
| poeud1 | China: Sichuan, Pinwu | n.a. | ||||||||
| meled1 | China: Yunnan, Hekou | |||||||||
| mephe1 | China: Fujian, Dehua | n.a. | ||||||||
| elhyp1 | China: Yunnan, Hekou | |||||||||
| elmal1 | China: Xizang, Motuo | |||||||||
| casag1 | China: Gansu, Wenxian | |||||||||
| NW121-7 | Vietnam | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |||||
| peade1 | China: Gansu, Wenxian | n.a. | ||||||||
| CP-B02 | Vietnam | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |||||
| loach1 | China: Shaanxi, Baoji | |||||||||
| hiaut1 | China: Qinghai, Huzhu | |||||||||
| nisch1 | China: Shaanxi, Huoditang | |||||||||
| lealb1 | China: Yunnan, Jinghong | |||||||||
| tatib1 | China: Shaanxi, Baoji | |||||||||
| nepul1 | China: Sichuan, Pingwu | |||||||||
| mymam1 | China: Yunnan, Jinping | |||||||||
| midry1 | China: Shaanxi, Baoji | |||||||||
| sthow1 | China: Yunnan, Hekou | n.a. | n.a. | |||||||
| faaer1 | China: Zhejiang, Danxi | n.a. | n.a. | |||||||
| NW114-17 | Indonesia | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |||||
| thlat1 | China: Yunnan, Jinghong | n.a. | ||||||||
| NW101-6 | Indonesia | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |||||
Note: * indicates the sequence downloaded from GenBank; n.a. indicates the corresponding gene fragment is not available.
Primers in PCRs for multiple genes used in this study.
| Gene | Primer name (forward or reverse reading) | Sequence | Annealing temperature | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCO1490 (f) | GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G | 51 °C | ||
| HCO2198 (r) | TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA AAT CA | |||
| EVA (f) | GAG ACC ATT ACT TGC TTT CAG TCA CT | 53 °C | ||
| PATRICK (r) | CTA ATA TGG CAG ATT ATA TGT ATT GG | |||
| CB-N3665 (f) | GTC CTA CCA TGA GGT CAA ATA TC | 50 °C | ||
| CB-N11526 (r) | TTC AAC TGG TCG TGC TCC AAT TCA | |||
| LR-J-12887 (f) | CCG GTT TGA ACT CAG ATC ACG T | 49 °C | ||
| LR-N-13398 (r) | CGC CTG TTT ATC AAA AAC AT | |||
| ELF2F (f) | AAA ATG CCC TGG TTC AAG GGA | 52 °C–57 °C | ||
| ef51.9 (f) | CAR GAC GTA TAC AAA ATC GG | |||
| efrcM4 (r) | ACA GCV ACK GTY TGY CTC ATR TC | |||
| rD3.2a (f) | AGT ACG TGA AAC CGT TCA SGG GT | 58.8 °C | ||
| Rd4.2b (r) | CCT TGG TCC GTG TTT CAA GAC GG |
Sequence statistics for the six gene regions.
| Number of sequences | 29 | 25 | 25 | 26 | 30 | 19 |
| Alignment length (bp) | 621 | 690 | 591 | 530 | 510 | 460 |
| Percentage A(%) | 29.6 | 34.9 | 31.7 | 37.7 | 25.5 | 15.5 |
| Percentage T(%) | 39.5 | 41.6 | 43.3 | 41.6 | 26.1 | 18.2 |
| Percentage C(%) | 16.7 | 13.4 | 16.0 | 12.8 | 25.9 | 33.8 |
| Percentage G(%) | 14.2 | 10.1 | 9.0 | 7.9 | 22.5 | 32.5 |
| Number of variable sites | 233 | 288 | 275 | 167 | 165 | 184 |
| Number of parsimony informative sites | 203 | 222 | 226 | 125 | 139 | 138 |
| Chi-square test of base frequency |
The best-fit partitioning schemes and corresponding partition models used in BI analysis.
| Partitioned dataset | Nucleotide model under BIC | Implemented parameters in BI analysis |
|---|---|---|
| 1) | GTR + I + G | nst = 6, rates = invgamma |
| 2) | HKY + I + G | nst = 2, rates = invgamma |
| 3) | HKY + G | nst = 2, rates = gamma |
| 4) | GTR + I + G | nst = 6, rates = invgamma |
| 5) | GTR + G | nst = 6, rates = gamma |
| 6) | TrN + I | nst = 6, rates = inv |
| 7) | JC | nst = 1 |
| 8) | GTR + G | nst = 6, rates = gamma |
Figure 1.A Bipartitions tree obtained from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on the full six-gene-dataset; numbers separated by a slash on node are bootstrap value (BV) and posterior probability (PP) B (Leech), habitus, dorsal view on the above and ventral view on the below.
Figure 2.50% majority-rule trees obtained from Bayesian inference (BI) analyses based on the non-COI + Cytb +COII-3rds-dataset. Numbers on nodes are the posterior probabilities (PP).
Figure 3.Phylogenetic informative profiles for all subsets used in this study. Ze. ; El. ; Me. ; Am. ; Sa. .