Literature DB >> 25878526

Phylogenetic utility of ribosomal genes for reconstructing the phylogeny of five Chinese satyrine tribes (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae).

Mingsheng Yang1, Yalin Zhang1.   

Abstract

Satyrinae is one of twelve subfamilies of the butterfly family Nymphalidae, which currently includes nine tribes. However, phylogenetic relationships among them remain largely unresolved, though different researches have been conducted based on both morphological and molecular data. However, ribosomal genes have never been used in tribe level phylogenetic analyses of Satyrinae. In this study we investigate for the first time the phylogenetic relationships among the tribes Elymniini, Amathusiini, Zetherini and Melanitini which are indicated to be a monophyletic group, and the Satyrini, using two ribosomal genes (28s rDNA and 16s rDNA) and four protein-coding genes (EF-1α, COI, COII and Cytb). We mainly aim to assess the phylogenetic informativeness of the ribosomal genes as well as clarify the relationships among different tribes. Our results show the two ribosomal genes generally have the same high phylogenetic informativeness compared with EF-1α; and we infer the 28s rDNA would show better informativeness if the 28s rDNA sequence data for each sampling taxon are obtained in this study. The placement of the monotypic genus Callarge Leech in Zetherini is confirmed for the first time based on molecular evidence. In addition, our maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) trees consistently show that the involved Satyrinae including the Amathusiini is monophyletic with high support values. Although the relationships among the five tribes are identical among ML and BI analyses and are mostly strongly-supported in BI analysis, those in ML analysis are lowly- or moderately- supported. Therefore, the relationships among the related five tribes recovered herein need further verification based on more sampling taxa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; Butterfly; Satyrinae; molecular systematics

Year:  2015        PMID: 25878526      PMCID: PMC4389127          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.488.9171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The butterfly subfamily , comprising approximately 2,500 described extant species, is amongst the most diverse groups in insects (Ackery et al. 1999). Recently, Marín et al. (2011) summarized the findings of systematic studies on this group (Peña et al. 2006; Peña and Wahlberg 2008; Wahlberg et al. 2009), proposing that the could be divided into nine tribes. However, phylogenetic relationships among them remain mostly unresolved despite they are assigned to four groups (Marín et al. 2011): group one consisting of two Neotropical and ; group two including , , , and ; group three including only the Neotropical ; and group four comprising the speciose distributed worldwide. Regarding the group two, phylogenetic relationships of its five tribes remain unresolved except for the well-defined sister relationship of and (Peña et al. 2006; Peña and Wahlberg 2008; Wahlberg et al. 2009; Price et al. 2011; see the figure 1 in Marín et al. 2011). The phylogenetic uncertainty among them can be mainly exhibited in two aspects: one is the weakly supported nodes bearing them; and another is the unstable topologies of trees conducted by different analysis methods (Peña et al. 2006; Peña and Wahlberg 2008; Wahlberg et al. 2009). It is widely accepted that selecting suitable genetic markers is of great importance in study of molecular systematics. In previous phylogenetic studies on the tribe level relationships of , the protein-coding genes (e.g., mitochondrial COI, and a number of nuclear genes) have been the main source of phylogenetic information (Peña et al. 2006; Peña and Wahlberg 2008; Wahlberg et al. 2009; Price et al. 2011). However, the ribosomal genes, to date have been never considered. The ribosomal genes have already been proven to be informative for phylogenetic analyses in other butterfly groups (e.g., 16s rDNA in Kim et al. 2010; 28s rDNA and 18s rDNA in Jiang et al. 2013). In order to test the phylogenetic utility of the ribosome genes for constructing the tribe level relationships of which have not been resolved based on morphological and protein-coding sequence data, two ribosomal genes (16s rDNA and 28s rDNA) as well as four additional protein-coding genes (COII, Cytb, COI and EF-1α) are used in our study to reconstruct the phylogeny of the , , , and which represent all the major lineages of Chinese satyrines. Besides, we further clarify the taxonomic placement of the Leech, a satyrine genus which has never been included in previous molecular studies.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling

A total of 30 species were included in the analyses (Table 1). Of these, the 21 in-group species represent all the five satyrine tribes occurring in China. In consideration of PageBreakPageBreakPageBreakprevious studies (Freitas and Brown 2004; Peña et al. 2006), other nine species of six subfamilies (, , , , and ) of the family were selected as outgroup taxa. Among them, Fruhstorfer of was used to root the resulting phylogenetic trees, since is widely accepted as the sister group to the rest (e.g., Ackery et al. 1999; Freitas and Brown 2004; Peña et al. 2006; Peña and Wahlberg 2008). The butterflies studied stem from the specimens in Entomological Museum of Northwest A&F University (NWAFU), Yangling, China. Details of the sampling are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.

Samples used for molecular analyses in this study together with relevant information.

SubfamilyTribeSpeciesSpecimen voucherCollecting localityGenBank accession number
COICOIICytb16s rDNAEF-1α28s rDNA
LibytheinaeLibythea myrrhalimyr1China: Yunnan, JinghongKC158418*KJ777775KJ805831KJ777730KJ805856KJ777756
DanainaeDanainiDanaus genutiadagen1China: Yunnan, HekouKF226386*KJ777776KJ805832KJ777731KJ805857KJ777757
Parantica sitapasit1China: Yunnan, RiliNC_024412*KJ777777KJ805833KJ777732KJ805858KJ777758
Euploea mulcibereumulChina: Yunnan, LincangNC_016720*KJ777778KJ805834KJ777733KJ805859KJ777759
ApaturinaeApatura iliaapili1China: Hunan, ZhangjiajieNC_016062*KJ777779KJ805835KJ777734KJ805860KJ777760
BiblidinaeBiblidiniAriadne merionearmer1China: Yunnan, LincangKC755827*KJ777780KJ805836KJ777735KJ805861KJ777761
CalinaginaeCalinaga davidiscadav1China: Sichuan, Mt. QingchengshanNC_015480*KJ777781KJ805837KJ777736KJ805862n.a.
CharaxinaeCharaxiniCharaxes bernarduschber1China: Yunnan, HekouEF534101*KJ777782KJ805838KJ777737KJ805863n.a.
Polyura eudamippuspoeud1China: Sichuan, PinwuAB855881*KJ777783KJ805839KJ777738KJ805864n.a.
SatyrinaeMelanitiniMelanitis ledameled1China: Yunnan, HekouKM111608KJ777784KJ805840KJ777739KJ805865KJ777762
Melanitis phedimamephe1China: Fujian, DehuaKM111609KJ777785KJ805841KJ777740KJ805866n.a.
ElymniiniElymnias hypermnestraelhyp1China: Yunnan, HekouKM111610KJ777786KJ805842KJ777741KJ805867KJ777763
Elymnias malelaselmal1China: Xizang, MotuoKM111611KJ777787KJ805843KJ777742KJ805868KJ777764
ZetheriniCallarge sagittacasag1China: Gansu, WenxianKM111612KJ777788KJ805844KJ777743KJ805869KJ777765
Ethope noireiNW121-7VietnamDQ338773*n.a.n.a.n.a.DQ338915*n.a.
Penthema adelmapeade1China: Gansu, WenxianEF534103*KJ777789KJ805845KJ777744KJ805870n.a.
Penthema darlisaCP-B02VietnamDQ338775*n.a.n.a.n.a.DQ338917*n.a.
SatyriniLopinga achineloach1China: Shaanxi, BaojiKM111631KJ777792KJ805848KJ777748KJ805874KJ777767
Hipparchia autonoehiaut1China: Qinghai, HuzhuKM111644KJ777794KJ805850KJ777750KJ805876KJ777769
Ninguta schrenkiinisch1China: Shaanxi, HuoditangKM111641KJ777793KJ805849KJ777749KJ805875KJ777768
Lethe albolineatalealb1China: Yunnan, JinghongKM111634KJ777795KJ805851KJ777751KJ805877KJ777770
Tatinga tibetanatatib1China: Shaanxi, BaojiKM111633KJ777796KJ805852KJ777752KJ805878KJ777771
Neope pulahanepul1China: Sichuan, PingwuKM111640KJ777797KJ805853KJ777753KJ805879KJ777772
Mycalesis mamertamymam1China: Yunnan, JinpingKM111627KJ777798KJ805854KJ777754KJ805880KJ777773
Minois dryasmidry1China: Shaanxi, BaojiKM111645KJ777799KJ805855KJ777755KJ805881KJ777774
AmathusiiniStichophthalma howquasthow1China: Yunnan, HekouAY218250*KJ777790n.a.KJ777745KJ805871n.a.
Faunis aeropefaaer1China: Zhejiang, Danxin.a.KJ777791KJ805846KJ777746KJ805872n.a.
Amathusia phidippusNW114-17IndonesiaDQ018956*n.a.n.a.n.a.DQ018923*n.a.
Thauria lathyithlat1China: Yunnan, JinghongKM111613n.a.KJ805847KJ777747KJ805873KJ777766
Discophora nechoNW101-6IndonesiaDQ338747*n.a.n.a.n.a.DQ338887*n.a.

Note: * indicates the sequence downloaded from GenBank; n.a. indicates the corresponding gene fragment is not available.

Samples used for molecular analyses in this study together with relevant information. Note: * indicates the sequence downloaded from GenBank; n.a. indicates the corresponding gene fragment is not available.

DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 95–100% ethanol-preserved muscle tissue of two adult butterfly legs, using an EasyPure Genomic DNA Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (TransGen Biotech Co., Led., Beijing, China). Extracted genomic DNA was eventually dissolved in 80 µL ddH2O and kept in a freezer (–20 °C) until it was used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sequences of six nuclear and mitochondrial genes (EF-1α, 28s rDNA, COI, COII, Cytb and 16s rDNA) were amplified through PCR in a total volume of 25 µL. The volume consisted of 12.5 µL CWBIO 2 × Taq MasterMix, 8.5 µL sterile distilled H2O, 2.0 µL genomic DNA template and 1.0 µL 10 µM each primer. The primers used and corresponding annealing temperature in PCR as well as references are listed in Table 2. After electrophoretic analysis to ensure the amplification products were the target fragments we needed, the PCR products were subsequently sent to Sunny Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for sequencing with the same primers used in the PCR. All sequences gathered in this study have been deposited in the GenBank.
Table 2.

Primers in PCRs for multiple genes used in this study.

GenePrimer name (forward or reverse reading)SequenceAnnealing temperatureReferences
COILCO1490 (f)GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G51 °CFolmer et al. (1994)
HCO2198 (r)TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA AAT CAFolmer et al. (1994)
COIIEVA (f)GAG ACC ATT ACT TGC TTT CAG TCA CT53 °CCaterino and Sperling (1999)
PATRICK (r)CTA ATA TGG CAG ATT ATA TGT ATT GGCaterino and Sperling (1999)
CytbCB-N3665 (f)GTC CTA CCA TGA GGT CAA ATA TC50 °CSimon et al. (2006)
CB-N11526 (r)TTC AAC TGG TCG TGC TCC AAT TCASimon et al. (2006)
16s rDNALR-J-12887 (f)CCG GTT TGA ACT CAG ATC ACG T49 °CSimon et al. (1994)
LR-N-13398 (r)CGC CTG TTT ATC AAA AAC ATSimon et al. (1994)
EF-1αELF2F (f)AAA ATG CCC TGG TTC AAG GGA52 °C–57 °CWan et al. (2013)
ef51.9 (f)CAR GAC GTA TAC AAA ATC GGMonteiro and Pierce (2001)
efrcM4 (r)ACA GCV ACK GTY TGY CTC ATR TCMonteiro and Pierce (2001)
28s rDNArD3.2a (f)AGT ACG TGA AAC CGT TCA SGG GT58.8 °CWhiting (2002)
Rd4.2b (r)CCT TGG TCC GTG TTT CAA GAC GGWhiting (2002)
Primers in PCRs for multiple genes used in this study.

Sequence analysis and phylogenetic inference

Sequence chromatogram was checked carefully using Chromas Pro software (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Tewntin, Australia). Each protein-coding sequence was translated for confirmation and assignment of codon positions in Primer Premier version 5.00 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA). Multiple sequences were aligned using MAFFT version 7.037 with the auto strategy (Katoh and Standley 2013) and, if necessary, manual adjustment was made in MEGA version 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013). Base frequency and the number of variable and parsimony informative sites were calculated in MEGA version 6.06 (Tamura et al. 2013). We investigated the chi-square of homogeneity of base frequencies across taxa for each gene with the program PAUP4.0b10 (Swofford 2002). The aligned ambiguous regions of two non-coding ribosomal genes (i.e. PageBreak16s rDNA and 28s rDNA) were retained because these positions might contain some information that is potentially useful for phylogenetic reconstruction (Aagesen 2004; Redelings and Suchard 2009). As proposed by Xia et al. (2003), we performed tests of substitutional saturation based on the Iss (i.e. index of substitutional saturation) statistic for different partitioned dataset with DAMBE version 5.3.74 (Xia 2013). For this method, if Iss is smaller than Iss.c (i.e. critical Iss), we can infer that the sequences have experienced little substitutional saturation (Xia and Lemey 2009). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using the raxmlGUI version 1.3 interface (Silvestro and Michalak 2012) of RAxML version 7.2.6 (Stamatakis 2006). The best-fit substitution model for each gene partition was determined by jModelTest version 2.1.4 (Darriba et al. 2012) under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (Akaike 1974). Clade supports were assessed using the ML + rapid bootstrap algorithm with 1000 bootstrap iterations. Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were conducted in MrBayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). The best-fit partitioning schemes and partition-specific substitution models, defined from 16 subsets formed by gene and codon position of the six genes used, were tested using the ‘greed’ algorithm of program PartitionFinder v1.1 PageBreak(Lanfear et al. 2012) under the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Two independent MCMC runs were performed either for 300,000 generations or until the average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. The sampling frequency was set as every 100 generations. After the first 25% of the yielded trees were discarded as burn-in, a 50% majority-rule consensus tree with the posterior probability (PP) values was constructed by summarizing the remaining trees. For BI analyses, two different datasets, the full six-gene-dataset and the non-COI + Cytb + COII-3rds-dataset (with 3rd positions removed), were used to examine the phylogenetic utility of the 3rd sites of COI + Cytb + COII, because these sites have suffered substantial saturation (see the results).

Phylogenetic informativeness

We used phylogenetic informativeness (PI) profiles to quantify the relative contribution of each partition to the resulted tree. The peak of the PI distribution is suggested to predict the maximum phylogenetic informativeness for corresponding partition (Owen et al. 2014). The PI profiles were generated with the PhyDesign (Townsend 2007; Lopez-Giraldez and Townsend 2011). For this, the aligned sequences and an ultrametric tree are needed as input files. In the sequence file, the eight partition schemes identified by PartitionFinder v1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012) were applied. The ultrametric tree was generated with the BEAST version 1.7.5 (Drummond et al. 2012) using the eight partitions and corresponding models determined by PartitionFinder v1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012) as well.

Results

Sequence characterization

One hundred and fifty-four sequences of the six genes were obtained for 30 species (Tables 1, 3). The final alignment yields 3,402 bp of the combined sequence data, of which 1,312 are variable and 1,053 are parsimony informative. The Chi-square test reveals no significant base composition heterogeneity among the taxa for any gene fragment, even for the 28s rDNA showing a high level of CG base composition (p = 0.138). In the case of the saturation test, all observed values of Iss are smaller than the Iss.c values for both symmetrical and asymmetrical topologies in all gene fragments. However, when the analysis was taken for each of the three codon positions of coding gene fragments separately, values of Iss for the third codons of all the COI, COII and Cytb genes are smaller than the Iss.c values in both symmetrical and asymmetrical topologies, indicating some of these sites have suffered substantial saturation.
Table 3.

Sequence statistics for the six gene regions.

COICOIICytb16s rDNAEF-1α28s rDNA
Number of sequences292525263019
Alignment length (bp)621690591530510460
Percentage A(%)29.634.931.737.725.515.5
Percentage T(%)39.541.643.341.626.118.2
Percentage C(%)16.713.416.012.825.933.8
Percentage G(%)14.210.19.07.922.532.5
Number of variable sites233288275167165184
Number of parsimony informative sites203222226125139138
Chi-square test of base frequencyp = 1.000p = 1.000p = 0.998p = 1.000p = 0.999p = 0.138
Sequence statistics for the six gene regions.

Model selection and phylogenetic reconstruction

Each gene partition shows the GTR + I + G for its best-fit substitution model except the 28s rDNA being the GTR + G, but we imposed the GTR + G for all gene partitions in ML analysis as recommended by Zahiri et al. (2011). For BI analysis, the best partitioning scheme includes eight partitions. Each partition and corresponding parameters used in BI analyses are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4.

The best-fit partitioning schemes and corresponding partition models used in BI analysis.

Partitioned datasetNucleotide model under BICImplemented parameters in BI analysis
1) COI 1st + COII 1st + Cytb 1stGTR + I + Gnst = 6, rates = invgamma
2) COI 2nd + COII 2nd + Cytb 2ndHKY + I + Gnst = 2, rates = invgamma
3) COI 3rd + COII 3rd + Cytb 3rdHKY + Gnst = 2, rates = gamma
4) 16s rDNAGTR + I + Gnst = 6, rates = invgamma
5) 28s rDNAGTR + Gnst = 6, rates = gamma
6) EF-1α 1stTrN + Inst = 6, rates = inv
7) EF-1α 2ndJCnst = 1
8) EF-1α 3rdGTR + Gnst = 6, rates = gamma
The best-fit partitioning schemes and corresponding partition models used in BI analysis. The ML and BI trees based on the full six-gene-dataset show generally identical topologies (summarized in Figure 1). All tribes included with two or more taxa examined in this study are recovered to be monophyletic mostly with strong support values. The traditional “satyrine” clade consisting of , and is well-recovered by strong bootstrap value (BV) 100 and PP 1.00. The five tribes of Chinese satyrines constitute the clade with BV 93 and PP 1.00. Within this clade, the is consistently recovered as sister of others. Then, branches off, and the is sister to the sister group ( + ), but the relationship between and is poorly supported by both ML and BI analyses (BV = 42, PP = 0.71). The genus is nested into the , forming a sister group with Westwood.
Figure 1.

A Bipartitions tree obtained from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on the full six-gene-dataset; numbers separated by a slash on node are bootstrap value (BV) and posterior probability (PP) B (Leech), habitus, dorsal view on the above and ventral view on the below.

A Bipartitions tree obtained from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on the full six-gene-dataset; numbers separated by a slash on node are bootstrap value (BV) and posterior probability (PP) B (Leech), habitus, dorsal view on the above and ventral view on the below. The trees constructed based on the non-COI + Cytb + COII-3rds-dataset is shown in Figure 2. The tree shows generally same topology with that based on the full six-gene-dataset, but some nodes especially that describing the terminal taxa are less resolved. This indicates that the 3rd sites of COI + Cytb + COII provided poor supports for the tribe level relationships.
Figure 2.

50% majority-rule trees obtained from Bayesian inference (BI) analyses based on the non-COI + Cytb +COII-3rds-dataset. Numbers on nodes are the posterior probabilities (PP).

50% majority-rule trees obtained from Bayesian inference (BI) analyses based on the non-COI + Cytb +COII-3rds-dataset. Numbers on nodes are the posterior probabilities (PP). As shown in Figure 3, the 3rd codon positions of the combined PageBreakCOI, Cytb and COII has the highest phylogenetic signal at all taxonomic levels, and a peak of the PI distribution can be recognized at about the 1/3 position of the tree near the terminal branches. Followed are the 1st codon positions of the combined COI, Cytb and COII. The ribosomal 16s and 28s DNA generally show the same phylogenetic informativeness with the 3rd codon positions of EF-1α, especially on the zone of tree showing the tribe level relationships of the . The remaining 2nd codon positions of the combined COI, Cytb and COII, the 1st and 2nd codon positions of EF-1α show relatively limited phylogenetic signals.
Figure 3.

Phylogenetic informative profiles for all subsets used in this study. Ze. ; El. ; Me. ; Am. ; Sa. .

Phylogenetic informative profiles for all subsets used in this study. Ze. ; El. ; Me. ; Am. ; Sa. .

Discussion

Phylogenetic informativeness of related genes

The studies of molecular systematics have been increasingly accessible because more genetic markers have been developed with the advances of sequencing technology. PageBreakHowever, how to make informed choice to these markers confuses many systematics (Danforth et al. 2005). In high level systematics of , EF-1α was commonly used and proven to be quite informative in all previous studies (Peña et al. 2006; Peña and Wahlberg 2008; Wahlberg et al. 2009). Our results show the two ribosomal genes (i.e. 16s rDNA and 28s rDNA) have generally the same phylogenetic informativeness with EF-1α (Figure 3), which indicates that the former two genes also contribute well in constructing the tribe level relationships. Moreover, we infer the 28s rDNA would show better informativeness if the 28s rDNA sequence data for each sampling taxon had been obtained in this study. The consistency between the 28s rDNA and EF-1α in phylogenetic utility supports the findings of Danforth et al. (2005) who suggested that the nuclear ribosomal and protein-coding genes should be combined in phylogenetic practices after comparing the substitution patterns between them in other groups of insects. The 16s rDNA have been proven to be informative in high level systematics (e.g. Nazari et al. 2007) and was even recommended as standard marker for insect phylogenetics (Caterino et al. 2000). The high phylogenetic utility of 16s rDNA examined in this study provides support for these proposals. However, this result does not support that mitochondrial gene datasets should not be applied on the deep divergences due to their substantial variation (Lin and Danforth 2004; Danforth et al. 2005). We do not recommend the use of the 3rd positions of combined COI, Cytb and COII in high level systematics of , although these sites show higher phylogenetic signals than other partitions (Figure 3). On the one hand, our saturation tests show some sites of the 3rd positions of combined COI, Cytb and COII have suffered substantial saturation. These sites may positively contribute to the tip nodes of trees, but for the nodes after the PI profile peak they may become the source of noise deep in the tree and cause homoplasy (Owen et al. 2014). On the other hand, the deep branch pattern of BI tree (Figure 2) generally not change when excluding the 3rd positions of combined COI, Cytb and COII. This result indicates that the 3rd positions of combined COI, Cytb and COII contribute poorly to the tribe level relationships of the trees based on the full six-gene-dataset.

Phylogenetic relationships among related tribes of

In this study, we present the first use of the ribosomal genes in reconstructing the tribe level relationships of the . The “satyrine” clade consisting of , and defined by Peña and Wahlberg (2008) and Wahlberg et al. (2009) are well-supported by our results. Moreover, monophyly of involved with the included is highly supported by all ML and BI analyses based on multiple outgroup taxa, which confirms, at least partially, the findings of Peña et al. (2006) who noted is monophyletic with inclusion of the tribes , and of (sensu Ackery et al. 1999) (Peña and Wahlberg 2008; Wahlberg et al. 2009). Among the five tribes of analyzed, our results recover the as the basal lineage with a long-branch split from the rest four tribes, in agreement with the findings of Peña et al. (2006) and Peña and Wahlberg (2008). However, relationships among the remaining four tribes are incongruent with other related studies regardless of the not included herein. Our results recover their relationships as + ( + ( + )); whereas other related studies concluded the following relationships: ( + ) + ( + ) in both ML and BI analyses of Wahlberg et al. (2009), the + + + in MP analysis of Wahlberg et al. (2009), and the + ( + ( + )) in BI analysis of Peña and Wahlberg (2008). Although ribosomal genes were used for the first time in our study, and both the ML and BI trees based on the full six-gene-dataset show identical topology, it should be noticed that the nodes in ML analysis describing the tribe level relationships are lowly- or moderately-supported. Therefore, the relationships among the related five tribes recovered herein need further verification based on more sampling taxa. The monotypic genus is distributed restrictedly in China and on the northern border of Vietnam. Morphologically, this genus has marked black veins and lacks eyespots on wings. It is currently placed in of (Chou 1999; Yuan et al. 2008) by the presence of hairless eyes, the wings without striking eyespots, and the forewing with basal part of vein Sc, posterior vein of discal cell and vein 2A not swollen (Chou 1998). For the first time, we verify the status of the genus based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, and reveal that it is sister to the in the present study.
  25 in total

1.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Brett Calcott; Simon Y W Ho; Stephane Guindon
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Higher level phylogeny of Satyrinae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based on DNA sequence data.

Authors:  Carlos Peña; Niklas Wahlberg; Elisabet Weingartner; Ullasa Kodandaramaiah; Sören Nylin; André V L Freitas; Andrew V Z Brower
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Profiling phylogenetic informativeness.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

9.  PhyDesign: an online application for profiling phylogenetic informativeness.

Authors:  Francesc López-Giráldez; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Molecular phylogeny of the butterfly genus Polytremis (Hesperiidae, Hesperiinae, Baorini) in China.

Authors:  Weibin Jiang; Jianqing Zhu; Chao Song; Xiaoyan Li; Yue Yang; Weidong Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Coenonympha amaryllis and monophyly of Satyrinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae).

Authors:  Lin Zhou; Chen Yang; Qing Zhai; Yalin Zhang
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 0.658

2.  Complete mitochondrial genome of the Woodland Brown, Lopinga achine Scopoli, 1763 (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and its phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Ling Wu; Ting-Ting Bao; Gang Sun; Ying Xiao; Yan Fang; Qing-Hui Shi
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 0.610

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.