Literature DB >> 25876992

[18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Standardized Uptake Value as a Predictor of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Te-Chun Hsieh1, Ching Yun Hsieh1, Tse Yen Yang1, Tzu Ting Chen1, Chen Yuan Lin1, Ching-Chan Lin2, Chung Hung Hua1, Chang-Fang Chiu1, Su-Peng Yeh1, Yuh Pyng Sher1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is controversial, and the identification of adequate predictive factors is warranted. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether the mean standardized uptake value (SUV) measured on [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) could predict the survival benefits for NPC patients that receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data for 174 NPC patients who underwent PET/computed tomography before chemoradiation between January 2004 and January 2012 were reviewed. The SUV75% was recorded for primary tumors. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy and cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3 cycles of 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin and 1,000 mg/m(2) fluorouracil for 4 days.
RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value was 8.35 for SUV75%, with 112 (64.4%) patients having lower SUV75% and 62 (35.6%) having higher SUV75%. Patients with lower SUV75% had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor stage, SUV75%, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significant prognostic factors for OS. Patients with higher SUV75% had significantly higher 5-year OS rates with adjuvant chemotherapy than without adjuvant chemotherapy (84.3% vs. 32.4%, respectively; p < .001). However, in the lower SUV75% group, no differences in 5-year OS were observed between patients who received and those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (92.4% vs. 93.3%, respectively; p = .682).
CONCLUSION: The SUV75% on FDG PET for primary tumors could successfully identify NPC patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant; Chemotherapy; Nasopharyngeal neoplasms; Positron emission tomography; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25876992      PMCID: PMC4425380          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  26 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET parameters and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kai-Ping Chang; Ngan-Ming Tsang; Chun-Ta Liao; Cheng-Lung Hsu; Ming-Jui Chung; Chuan-Wei Lo; Sheng-Chieh Chan; Shu-Hang Ng; Hung-Ming Wang; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Chao-Su Hu; Xiao-Zhong Chen; Guo-Qing Hu; Zhi-Bin Cheng; Yan Sun; Wei-Xiong Li; Yuan-Yuan Chen; Fang-Yun Xie; Shao-Bo Liang; Yong Chen; Ting-Ting Xu; Bin Li; Guo-Xian Long; Si-Yang Wang; Bao-Min Zheng; Ying Guo; Ying Sun; Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Yu-Ming Chen; Meng-Zhong Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Phase III study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: positive effect on overall and progression-free survival.

Authors:  Jin-Ching Lin; Jian-Sheng Jan; Chen-Yi Hsu; Wen-Miin Liang; Rong-San Jiang; Wen-Yi Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience.

Authors:  Michael K M Kam; Peter M L Teo; Ricky M C Chau; K Y Cheung; Peter H K Choi; W H Kwan; S F Leung; Benny Zee; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Treatment results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the modern era: the Hong Kong experience.

Authors:  Anne W M Lee; W M Sze; Joseph S K Au; S F Leung; T W Leung; Daniel T T Chua; Benny C Y Zee; Stephen C K Law; Peter M L Teo; Stewart Y Tung; Dora L W Kwong; W H Lau
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  Abdelkarim S Allal; Daniel O Slosman; Tayeb Kebdani; Mohamed Allaoua; Willy Lehmann; Pavel Dulguerov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Prediction for distant failure in patients with stage M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the role of standardized uptake value.

Authors:  Sheng-Chieh Chan; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Chien-Yu Lin; Shu-Hang Ng; Kang-Hsing Fan; Shy-Chyi Chin; Chua-Ta Liao; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT before and after radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Xie; J-B Yue; Z Fu; R Feng; J-M Yu
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Current and emerging treatment options for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Nancy Lee
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  FDG uptake, a surrogate of tumour hypoxia?

Authors:  Rudi Andre Dierckx; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  6 in total

1.  Radiomics Model to Predict Early Progression of Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Richard Du; Victor H Lee; Hui Yuan; Ka-On Lam; Herbert H Pang; Yu Chen; Edmund Y Lam; Pek-Lan Khong; Anne W Lee; Dora L Kwong; Varut Vardhanabhuti
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-07-10

2.  18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Shi Qi; Yang Zhongyi; Zhang Yingjian; Hu Chaosu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  An inflammatory biomarker-based nomogram to predict prognosis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of a prospective study.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Li; Hui Chang; Bing-Qing Xu; Ya-Lan Tao; Jin Gao; Chen Chen; Chen Qu; Shu Zhou; Song-Ran Liu; Xiao-Hui Wang; Wen-Wen Zhang; Xin Yang; Si-Lang Zhou; Yun-Fei Xia
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 4.  Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET-CT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Yecai Huang; Mei Feng; Qiao He; Jun Yin; Peng Xu; Qinghua Jiang; Jinyi Lang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Guozhu Xie; Guixiang Liao; Baiyao Wang; Miaohong Yan; Hui Li; Yawei Yuan
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-16

6.  Development and validation of radiologic scores for guiding individualized induction chemotherapy in T3N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Yang; Yi-Shan Wu; Pu-Yun OuYang; Fang-Yun Xie; Ya-Jun Pang; Su-Ming Xiao; Bao-Yu Zhang; Zhi-Qiao Liu; En-Ni Chen; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 7.034

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.