Literature DB >> 25876052

Detection of anaerobic infection in diabetic foot ulcer using PCR technique and the status of metronidazole therapy on treatment outcome.

Nitin Aherrao1, Shailesh K Shahi2, Awanindra Dwivedi2, Ashok Kumar2, Sanjeev Gupta3, Surya Kumar Singh4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Metronidazole is the drug of choice for anaerobic infection in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) for a majority of clinicians. The present study was conducted to determine if Metronidazole is really making a difference in the healing of DFU.
METHODS: Deep tissue samples from the wound area of 61 diabetic foot patients were tested for anaerobic bacterial infection (Peptostreptococcus productus, Bacteroides, and Clostridium) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR-positive patients were randomized into 2 groups: Metronidazole and non-Metronidazole. Antibiotics for the control of infection were given in both groups as per clinical condition of patients. Treatment outcome was assessed by complete healing of the wound.
RESULTS: Out of 61 patients, PCR detected evidence of anaerobic infection in 32 (52%), while culture methods detected only 5 (8%) (Clostridium spp.), hence emphasizing the significance of the PCR technique over culture methods in detection of microbes. In this study, Clostridium was found with maximum prevalence of n (75%), followed by Bacteroides with n (53.1%), and Peptostreptococcus productus with n (40.6 %). Across all Wagner Ulcer Classification grades, Clostridium was the most prevalent anaerobe, and significantly associated with wound age and total leukocyte count. No difference was noted in wound healing in both groups at the end of 16 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose that it is not mandatory to supplement Metronidazole in antibiotic regime for treatment of DFU.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 25876052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wounds        ISSN: 1044-7946            Impact factor:   1.546


  5 in total

1.  Metataxonomic approach to decipher the polymicrobial burden in diabetic foot ulcer and its biofilm mode of infection.

Authors:  Karthika Suryaletha; Joby John; Megha Periyappilly Radhakrishnan; Sanil George; Sabu Thomas
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Role of anaerobes in polymicrobial communities and biofilms complicating diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Matthew Malone; Dieter Mayer; Anne-Marie Salisbury; Gregory Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Isolation of bacteria from diabetic foot ulcers with special reference to anaerobe isolation by simple two-step combustion technique in candle jar.

Authors:  Jayeeta Haldar; Poulami Mukherjee; Satinath Mukhopadhyay; Prasanta Kumar Maiti
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  One step closer to understanding the role of bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers: characterising the microbiome of ulcers.

Authors:  Karen Smith; Andrew Collier; Eleanor M Townsend; Lindsay E O'Donnell; Abhijit M Bal; John Butcher; William G Mackay; Gordon Ramage; Craig Williams
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Choices and Challenges of Antibiotics Therapy in Diabetic Foot Infection.

Authors:  S K Singh; Balram Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.