Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the major cause of death in the general population and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. In particular, the CV morbidity and mortality rate is highly prevalent in CKDpatients because of frequently concomitant hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, vascular calcification (VC), diabetes and mineral bone disease (CKD-MBD). More recently, a ‘relatively’ new emerging factor that is strongly associated with CV risk in CKDpatients has been recognized and investigated: vitamin D deficiency [1].Our understanding of the biological effects of the vitamin D system has evolved considerably in recent years, with the identification of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-D) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-D) as hormones with ‘pleiotropic’ effects beyond mineral metabolism and parathyroid hormone (PTH) control in CKDpatients [2]. Indeed, recent studies have been proposed and realized to investigate the effects of either native 25-D or active 1,25-D on the CV and renal systems [3].I read with interest the article by Loh et al. [4] in this issue of the journal regarding the association of lower serum 25-D levels and the prevalence of diabetes and absence of native vitamin D supplementation in 219 CKDpatients in Singapore. Considering that Singapore is a country where exposure to sunlight is adequate, it may be surprising to learn that 25.6% of the observed CKDpatients showed serum 25-D levels <16 ng/mL. As it is nearly impossible to get adequate amounts of vitamin D from their diet (mushrooms, eggs and fish), sunlight exposure is the only reliable way to generate vitamin D. Even in such a sun-rich country as Singapore, vitamin D deficiency is high in CKDpatients. Do we have a solution to this problem?The ‘optimal’ vitamin D levels remain to be determined; however, the definition of ‘vitamin D deficiency’ when 25-D levels fall <20 ng/mL (∼50 nmol/L) should be generally accepted.Vitamin D receptors (VDRs) are present in several (probably all) systems and tissues (Figure 1) and VDR activation is associated with positive effects, such as better blood pressure control and prevention of diabetic nephropathy. Systemic activation of VDRs, as suggested by observational studies, may decrease CV mortality in the general population and especially in patients affected by renal failure [5]. Moreover, a meta-analysis of randomized trials analysing the impact of vitamin D among patients with different health conditions demonstrated that vitamin D intake reduces the all-cause mortality rates [6].
Fig. 1.
Vitamin D receptor distribution in human organs and tissues.
Vitamin D receptor distribution in human organs and tissues.In a prospective study, men with vitamin D deficiency (25-D levels <15 ng/mL) showed an increased risk of myocardial infarction [5]: it was proposed that VDR signalling had a possible anti-hypertrophic action. Vitamin D deficiency was also found to be associated with an increased pulse wave velocity and arterial stiffness along with increased left ventricular hypertrophy and CV mortality in dialysis patients [7, 8]. Some clinical studies showed an inverse relationship between the circulating vitamin D levels and blood pressure and/or plasma renin activity, but the mechanism is unclear [9].Nevertheless, CKDpatients present a condition of chronic inflammation involving the CV system and a reduced immunity to infections. Evidence from several studies demonstrated a possible role of vitamin D as an immuno-modulatory and anti-inflammatory agent [10]. Non-specific microinflammation, characterizing CKDpatients, has been investigated as a risk factor involved in the pathogenesis of accelerated atherosclerosis and VC. In fact, CKDpatients affected by vascular or valvular calcification have higher serum levels of various markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α or interleukin-6 (IL-6) [11].The link between vitamin D deficiency and CV morbidity and mortality is currently arousing great interest. In CKDpatients, this association is even stronger, because VDR activation decreases as a result of progressive renal impairment. In fact, a poor vitamin D status in CKDpatients is a risk factor for CV mortality. Haemodialysis patients with very low levels of 25-D and 1,25-D are at a significantly increased risk of early CV mortality, including sudden cardiac arrest [12, 13]. Furthermore, in non-dialysis CKDpatients this increased risk still persists with severely deficient 25-D levels <10 ng/mL showing an almost 6-fold higher risk of mortality than patients with adequate levels (≥30 ng/mL) [14].Most importantly, native vitamin D supplementation with ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol has been associated with a significant reduction in total mortality by 7% compared with placebo [6]. Therefore, accordingly with the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome guidelines 25-D testing should be routine in CKDpatients and they should be re-tested after 3 months of supplementation, aiming for a level of at least 30 ng/mL [15].Although native (or dietary) vitamin D supplementation can replenish 25-D levels in CKD, there is also a need for VDR activation therapy (calcitriol or selective VDR activators) to correct abnormally low levels of 1,25-D and to control serum PTH levels [16, 17].In conclusion, because the CV system is a major target tissue for vitamin D, CKDpatients with a poor 25-D status are at elevated risk of CV mortality [18]. Native vitamin D may reduce CV events and mortality, even if, at present, no sufficient outcome data can confirm this. Large randomized controlled trials should elucidate this apparent benefit of CV risk reduction and mortality in CKDpatients treated with vitamin D.
Authors: Diego Brancaccio; Mario Cozzolino; Giuseppe Cannella; Piergiorgio Messa; Mario Bonomini; Giovanni Cancarini; Maria Rosa Caruso; Carmelo Cascone; Anna Maria Costanzo; Umberto di Luzio Paparatti; Sandro Mazzaferro Journal: Blood Purif Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 2.614
Authors: Stefan Pilz; Andreas Tomaschitz; Claudia Friedl; Karin Amrein; Christiane Drechsler; Eberhard Ritz; Bernhard O Boehm; Tanja B Grammer; Winfried März Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Christiane Drechsler; Marion Verduijn; Stefan Pilz; Friedo W Dekker; Raymond T Krediet; Eberhard Ritz; Christoph Wanner; Elisabeth W Boeschoten; Vincent Brandenburg Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Ravi Thadhani; Evan Appelbaum; Yuchiao Chang; Yili Pritchett; Ishir Bhan; Rajiv Agarwal; Carmine Zoccali; Christoph Wanner; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Jorge Cannata; Taylor Thompson; Paul Audhya; Dennis Andress; Wuyan Zhang; Jun Ye; David Packham; Bhupinder Singh; Daniel Zehnder; Warren J Manning; Ajay Pachika; Scott D Solomon Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Pooneh Alborzi; Nina A Patel; Carla Peterson; Jennifer E Bills; Dagim M Bekele; Zerihun Bunaye; Robert P Light; Rajiv Agarwal Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Pablo Molina; José L Górriz; Mariola D Molina; Sandra Beltrán; Belén Vizcaíno; Verónica Escudero; Julia Kanter; Ana I Ávila; Jordi Bover; Elvira Fernández; Javier Nieto; Secundino Cigarrán; Enrique Gruss; Gema Fernández-Juárez; Alberto Martínez-Castelao; Juan F Navarro-González; Ramón Romero; Luis M Pallardó Journal: World J Nephrol Date: 2016-09-06