Literature DB >> 25871779

Systems Biology Modeling of Five Pathways for Regulation and Potent Inhibition of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex (APC/C): Pivotal Roles for MCC and BubR1.

Bashar Ibrahim1.   

Abstract

Correct DNA segregation is a fundamental process that ensures the precise and reliable inheritance of genomic information for the propagation of cell life. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a conserved surveillance control mechanism for DNA segregation named the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC).The SAC ensures that the sister chromatids of the duplicated genome are not separated and distributed to the spindle poles before all chromosomes have been properly linked to the microtubules of the mitotic spindle. Biochemically, the SAC delays cell cycle progression by preventing activation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) or cyclosome whose activation by Cdc20 is required for sister-chromatid separation; this marks the transition into anaphase. In response to activation of the checkpoint, various species control the activity of both APC/C and Cdc20. However, the underlying regulatory pathways remain largely elusive. In this study, five possible model variants of APC/C regulation were constructed, namely BubR1, Mad2, MCC, MCF2, and an all-pathways model variant. These models were validated with experimental data from the literature. A wide range of parameter values has been tested to find the critical values of the APC/C binding rate. The results show that all variants are able to capture the wild-type behavior of the APC/C. However, only one model variant, which included both MCC as well as BubR1 as potent inhibitors of the APC/C, was able to reproduce both wild-type and mutant type behavior of APC/C regulation. In conclusion, the presented work informs the regulation of fundamental processes such as SAC and APC/C in cell biology and has successfully distinguished between five competing dynamical models using a systems biology approach. The results attest that systems-level approaches are vital for molecular and cell biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25871779      PMCID: PMC4424970          DOI: 10.1089/omi.2015.0027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  66 in total

1.  Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1-Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Lucia Sironi; Marina Mapelli; Stefan Knapp; Anna De Antoni; Kuan-Teh Jeang; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  X He; T E Patterson; S Sazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Toward a systems-level view of mitotic checkpoints.

Authors:  Bashar Ibrahim
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore requires the Rod/Zw10 complex.

Authors:  Eulalie Buffin; Christophe Lefebvre; Junyong Huang; Mary Elisabeth Gagou; Roger E Karess
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics.

Authors:  Martin Vink; Marco Simonetta; Pietro Transidico; Karin Ferrari; Marina Mapelli; Anna De Antoni; Lucia Massimiliano; Andrea Ciliberto; Mario Faretta; Edward D Salmon; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Modeling the temporal evolution of the spindle assembly checkpoint and role of Aurora B kinase.

Authors:  Hitesh B Mistry; David E MacCallum; Robert C Jackson; Mark A J Chaplain; Fordyce A Davidson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The role of localization in the operation of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Maiko Lohel; Bashar Ibrahim; Stephan Diekmann; Peter Dittrich
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Pharmacologic inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex induces a spindle checkpoint-dependent mitotic arrest in the absence of spindle damage.

Authors:  Xing Zeng; Frederic Sigoillot; Shantanu Gaur; Sungwoon Choi; Kathleen L Pfaff; Dong-Chan Oh; Nathaniel Hathaway; Nevena Dimova; Gregory D Cuny; Randall W King
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Unattached kinetochores catalyze production of an anaphase inhibitor that requires a Mad2 template to prime Cdc20 for BubR1 binding.

Authors:  Anita Kulukian; Joo Seok Han; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 10.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.

Authors:  Andrea Musacchio; Edward D Salmon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 94.444

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spindle assembly checkpoint is sufficient for complete Cdc20 sequestering in mitotic control.

Authors:  Bashar Ibrahim
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 7.271

2.  Multi-scale stochastic organization-oriented coarse-graining exemplified on the human mitotic checkpoint.

Authors:  Richard Henze; Chunyan Mu; Mate Puljiz; Nishanthan Kamaleson; Jan Huwald; John Haslegrave; Pietro Speroni di Fenizio; David Parker; Christopher Good; Jonathan E Rowe; Bashar Ibrahim; Peter Dittrich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Trends in mathematical modeling of host-pathogen interactions.

Authors:  Jan Ewald; Patricia Sieber; Ravindra Garde; Stefan N Lang; Stefan Schuster; Bashar Ibrahim
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 9.261

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.