Literature DB >> 16631582

In vitro FRAP identifies the minimal requirements for Mad2 kinetochore dynamics.

Martin Vink1, Marco Simonetta, Pietro Transidico, Karin Ferrari, Marina Mapelli, Anna De Antoni, Lucia Massimiliano, Andrea Ciliberto, Mario Faretta, Edward D Salmon, Andrea Musacchio.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mad1 and Mad2 are constituents of the spindle-assembly checkpoint, a device coupling the loss of sister-chromatid cohesion at anaphase to the completion of microtubule attachment of the sister chromatids at metaphase. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed that the interaction of cytosolic Mad2 with kinetochores is highly dynamic, suggesting a mechanism of catalytic activation of Mad2 at kinetochores followed by its release in a complex with Cdc20. The recruitment of cytosolic Mad2 to kinetochores has been attributed to a stable receptor composed of a distinct pool of Mad2 tightly bound to Mad1. Whether specifically this interaction accounts for the kinetochore dynamics of Mad2 is currently unknown.
RESULTS: To gain a precise molecular understanding of the interaction of Mad2 with kinetochores, we reconstituted the putative Mad2 kinetochore receptor and developed a kinetochore recruitment assay with purified components. When analyzed by FRAP in vitro, this system faithfully reproduced the previously described in vivo dynamics of Mad2, providing an unequivocal molecular account of the interaction of Mad2 with kinetochores. Using the same approach, we dissected the mechanism of action of p31(comet), a spindle-assembly checkpoint inhibitor.
CONCLUSIONS: In vitro FRAP is a widely applicable approach to dissecting the molecular bases of the interaction of a macromolecule with an insoluble cellular scaffold. The combination of in vitro fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with additional fluorescence-based assays in vitro can be used to unveil mechanism, stoichiometry, and kinetic parameters of a macromolecular interaction, all of which are important for modeling protein interaction networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631582     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  52 in total

1.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

Review 3.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Modeling dual pathways for the metazoan spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Richard P Sear; Martin Howard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Systematic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that the spindle checkpoint is composed of two largely independent branches.

Authors:  Anthony Essex; Alexander Dammermann; Lindsay Lewellyn; Karen Oegema; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Probing the in vivo function of Mad1:C-Mad2 in the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Luca L Fava; Manuel Kaulich; Erich A Nigg; Anna Santamaria
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Functional characterization of Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) E3 ubiquitin ligases in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jinfang Zhang; Lixin Wan; Xiangpeng Dai; Yi Sun; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-02-22

8.  Nuclear pores protect genome integrity by assembling a premitotic and Mad1-dependent anaphase inhibitor.

Authors:  Veronica Rodriguez-Bravo; John Maciejowski; Jennifer Corona; Håkon Kirkeby Buch; Philippe Collin; Masato T Kanemaki; Jagesh V Shah; Prasad V Jallepalli
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Assembly and dynamics of myofibrils.

Authors:  Joseph W Sanger; Jushuo Wang; Yingli Fan; Jennifer White; Jean M Sanger
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-10

10.  The influence of catalysis on mad2 activation dynamics.

Authors:  Marco Simonetta; Romilde Manzoni; Roberto Mosca; Marina Mapelli; Lucia Massimiliano; Martin Vink; Bela Novak; Andrea Musacchio; Andrea Ciliberto
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.