OBJECTIVE: Social comparisons (i.e. self-evaluations relative to others) may affect motivation for diabetes self-care behaviours. Comparisons can have either positive or negative effects, but it is not clear what differentiates these responses. This study tested the effect of a patient's perceived similarity to a comparison target on motivation for self-care. DESIGN: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (n = 180, MA1c = 7.59%) selected to read one of four brief descriptions of a patient with diabetes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants rated their motivation for self-care behaviours prior and subsequent to reading and reported the extent to which they focused on similarities between the self and the selected patient while reading. RESULTS: Perceived similarity moderated the effect of selection on motivation for self-care (p = .01, η2 = .06). Increased motivation was observed if participants focused on similarities with patients 'doing better' (i.e. high coping effectiveness/low symptom severity) and decreased motivation if they focused on similarities with patients 'doing worse' (low coping effectiveness/high symptom severity). CONCLUSIONS: Providing social comparison information in diabetes management (and perhaps other chronic diseases) may improve motivation for self-care among some patients. A subset of patients, however, may benefit from guidance to focus on similarities with certain targets.
OBJECTIVE: Social comparisons (i.e. self-evaluations relative to others) may affect motivation for diabetes self-care behaviours. Comparisons can have either positive or negative effects, but it is not clear what differentiates these responses. This study tested the effect of a patient's perceived similarity to a comparison target on motivation for self-care. DESIGN: Individuals with type 2 diabetes (n = 180, MA1c = 7.59%) selected to read one of four brief descriptions of a patient with diabetes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants rated their motivation for self-care behaviours prior and subsequent to reading and reported the extent to which they focused on similarities between the self and the selected patient while reading. RESULTS: Perceived similarity moderated the effect of selection on motivation for self-care (p = .01, η2 = .06). Increased motivation was observed if participants focused on similarities with patients 'doing better' (i.e. high coping effectiveness/low symptom severity) and decreased motivation if they focused on similarities with patients 'doing worse' (low coping effectiveness/high symptom severity). CONCLUSIONS: Providing social comparison information in diabetes management (and perhaps other chronic diseases) may improve motivation for self-care among some patients. A subset of patients, however, may benefit from guidance to focus on similarities with certain targets.
Entities:
Keywords:
diabetes; illness self-care; motivation; perceived similarity; social comparison
Authors: Danielle Arigo; Jacqueline A Mogle; Megan M Brown; Kristen Pasko; Laura Travers; Logan Sweeder; Joshua M Smyth Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-01-22
Authors: William Martinez; Kenneth A Wallston; David G Schlundt; Gerald B Hickson; Kemberlee R Bonnet; Ricardo J Trochez; Tom A Elasy Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2018-05-21
Authors: Danielle Arigo; Megan M Brown; Kristen Pasko; Matthew Cole Ainsworth; Laura Travers; Adarsh Gupta; Danielle Symons Downs; Joshua M Smyth Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2020-10-15