Literature DB >> 25870815

From the ground up: building a minimally invasive aortic valve surgery program.

Tom C Nguyen1, Joseph Lamelas1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) is associated with numerous advantages including improved patient satisfaction, cosmesis, decreased transfusion requirements, and cost-effectiveness. Despite these advantages, little information exists on how to build a MIAVR program from the ground up. The steps to build a MIAVR program include compiling a multi-disciplinary team composed of surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, perfusionists, operating room (OR) technicians, and nurses. Once assembled, this team can then approach hospital administrators to present a cost-benefit analysis of MIAVR, emphasizing the importance of reduced resource utilization in the long-term to offset the initial financial investment that will be required. With hospital approval, training can commence to provide surgeons and other staff with the necessary knowledge and skills in MIAVR procedures and outcomes. Marketing and advertising of the program through the use of social media, educational conferences, grand rounds, and printed media will attract the initial patients. A dedicated website for the program can function as a "virtual lobby" for patients wanting to learn more. Initially, conservative selection criteria of cases that qualify for MIAVR will set the program up for success by avoiding complex co-morbidities and surgical techniques. During the learning curve phase of the program, patient safety should be a priority.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery; aortic valve; building; program

Year:  2015        PMID: 25870815      PMCID: PMC4384259          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.03.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  8 in total

1.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Simulation in cardiothoracic surgical training: where do we stand?

Authors:  Kanika Trehan; Clinton D Kemp; Stephen C Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  How to start a minimal access mitral valve program.

Authors:  Steven Hunter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

4.  Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center.

Authors:  David M Holzhey; Joerg Seeburger; Martin Misfeld; Michael A Borger; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Mark J Russo; Y Claire Wang; Jonathan Yang; Kimberly N Hong; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair.

Authors:  L H Cohn; D H Adams; G S Couper; D P Bichell; D M Rosborough; S P Sears; S F Aranki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  L H Cohn; D H Adams; G S Couper; D P Bichell
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.