BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% to 20% of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) tests are inappropriate based on professional-society recommendations. The correlation between inappropriate MPI and quality care metrics is not known. HYPOTHESIS: Inappropriate MPI will be associated with low achievement of quality care metrics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional investigation at a single Veterans Affairs medical center. Myocardial perfusion imaging tests ordered by primary-care clinicians between December 2010 and July 2011 were assessed for appropriateness (by 2009 criteria). Using documentation of the clinical encounter where MPI was ordered, we determined how often quality care metrics were achieved. RESULTS: Among 516 MPI patients, 52 (10.1%) were inappropriate and 464 (89.9%) were not inappropriate (either appropriate or uncertain). Hypertension (82.2%), diabetes mellitus (41.3%), and coronary artery disease (41.1%) were common. Glycated hemoglobin levels were lower in the inappropriate MPI cohort (6.6% vs 7.5%; P = 0.04). No difference was observed in the proportion with goal hemoglobin (62.5% vs 46.3% for appropriate/uncertain; P = 0.258). Systolic blood pressure was not different (132 mm Hg vs 135 mm Hg; P = 0.34). Achievement of several other categorical quality metrics was low in both cohorts and no differences were observed. More than 90% of clinicians documented a plan to achieve most metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate MPI is not associated with performance on metrics of quality care. If an association exists, it may be between inappropriate MPI and overly aggressive care. Most clinicians document a plan of care to address failure of quality metrics, suggesting awareness of the problem.
BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% to 20% of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) tests are inappropriate based on professional-society recommendations. The correlation between inappropriate MPI and quality care metrics is not known. HYPOTHESIS: Inappropriate MPI will be associated with low achievement of quality care metrics. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional investigation at a single Veterans Affairs medical center. Myocardial perfusion imaging tests ordered by primary-care clinicians between December 2010 and July 2011 were assessed for appropriateness (by 2009 criteria). Using documentation of the clinical encounter where MPI was ordered, we determined how often quality care metrics were achieved. RESULTS: Among 516 MPI patients, 52 (10.1%) were inappropriate and 464 (89.9%) were not inappropriate (either appropriate or uncertain). Hypertension (82.2%), diabetes mellitus (41.3%), and coronary artery disease (41.1%) were common. Glycated hemoglobin levels were lower in the inappropriate MPI cohort (6.6% vs 7.5%; P = 0.04). No difference was observed in the proportion with goal hemoglobin (62.5% vs 46.3% for appropriate/uncertain; P = 0.258). Systolic blood pressure was not different (132 mm Hg vs 135 mm Hg; P = 0.34). Achievement of several other categorical quality metrics was low in both cohorts and no differences were observed. More than 90% of clinicians documented a plan to achieve most metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate MPI is not associated with performance on metrics of quality care. If an association exists, it may be between inappropriate MPI and overly aggressive care. Most clinicians document a plan of care to address failure of quality metrics, suggesting awareness of the problem.
Authors: Naomi S Bardach; Jason J Wang; Samantha F De Leon; Sarah C Shih; W John Boscardin; L Elizabeth Goldman; R Adams Dudley Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Jagat Narula; Leslee J Shaw; Heidi Gransar; Daniel S Berman; James K Min Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: David E Winchester; Ryan J Chauffe; Ryan Meral; Daniel Nguyen; Scott Ryals; Raman Dusaj; Leslee Shaw; Rebecca J Beyth Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Michael J Wolk; Steven R Bailey; John U Doherty; Pamela S Douglas; Robert C Hendel; Christopher M Kramer; James K Min; Manesh R Patel; Lisa Rosenbaum; Leslee J Shaw; Raymond F Stainback; Joseph M Allen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Thomas M Maddox; Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Fengming Tang; Phil Jones; P Michael Ho; Steven M Bradley; Thomas T Tsai; Deepak L Bhatt; Pamela N Peterson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steven M Bradley; Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Kevin F Kennedy; Pamela S Douglas; Manesh R Patel; H Vernon Anderson; Henry H Ting; John S Rumsfeld; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-05-10
Authors: Vicente Taasan; Anita Wokhlu; Michael V Taasan; Raman S Dusaj; Ajay Mehta; Steven Kraft; David Winchester; David Wymer Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 5.952