Literature DB >> 25868696

A blind accuracy assessment of computer-modeled forensic facial reconstruction using computed tomography data from live subjects.

Caroline Wilkinson1, Chris Rynn, Heather Peters, Myke Taister, Chung How Kau, Stephen Richmond.   

Abstract

A computer modeling system for facial reconstruction has been developed that employs a touch-based application to create anatomically accurate facial models focusing on skeletal detail. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the system and illustrates its accuracy and reliability with a blind study using computed tomography (CT) data of living individuals. Three-dimensional models of the skulls of two white North American adults (one male, one female) were imported into the computer system. Facial reconstructions were produced by two practitioners following the Manchester method. Two posters were produced, each including a face pool of five surface model images and the facial reconstruction. The face pool related to the sex, age, and ethnic group of the target individual and included the surface model image of the target individual. Fifty-two volunteers were asked to choose the face from the face pool that most resembled each reconstruction. Both reconstructions received majority percentage hit rates that were at least 50% greater than any other face in the pool. The combined percentage hit rate was 50% above chance (70%). A quantitative comparison of the facial morphology between the facial reconstructions and the CT scan models of the subjects was carried out using Rapidform(™) 2004 PP2-RF4. The majority of the surfaces of the facial reconstructions showed less than 2.5 mm error and 90% of the male face and 75% of the female face showed less than 5 mm error. Many of the differences between the facial reconstructions and the facial scans were probably the result of positional effects caused during the CT scanning procedure, especially on the female subject who had a fatter face than the male subject. The areas of most facial reconstruction error were at the ears and nasal tip.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 25868696     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-006-0007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.456


  11 in total

1.  Building faces from dry skulls: are they recognized above chance rates?

Authors:  C N Stephan; M Henneberg
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Computer-assisted facial reproduction.

Authors:  D H Ubelaker; G O'Donnell
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Computer-aided forensic facial reconstruction.

Authors:  R Evenhouse; M Rasmussen; L Sadler
Journal:  J Biocommun       Date:  1992

4.  The application of volume deformation to three-dimensional facial reconstruction: a comparison with previous techniques.

Authors:  L A Nelson; S D Michael
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1998-06-22       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  In vivo facial tissue depth measurements for children and adults.

Authors:  M H Manhein; G A Listi; R E Barsley; R Musselman; N E Barrow; D H Ubelaker
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.832

6.  Three-dimensional visualization of the face and skull using computerized tomography and laser scanning techniques.

Authors:  J P Moss; A D Linney; S R Grindrod; S R Arridge; J S Clifton
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Reconstruction of facial features from the skull: an evaluation of its usefulness in forensic anthropology.

Authors:  C C Snow; B P Gatliff; K R McWilliams
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  The computer-aided facial reconstruction system.

Authors:  S Miyasaka; M Yoshino; K Imaizumi; S Seta
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1995-06-30       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Facial sculpture on the skull for identification.

Authors:  B P Gatliff
Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 0.921

10.  Recognising facial surfaces.

Authors:  V Bruce; P Healey; M Burton; T Doyle; A Coombes; A Linney
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Forensic Facial Reconstruction: The Final Frontier.

Authors:  Sonia Gupta; Vineeta Gupta; Hitesh Vij; Ruchieka Vij; Nutan Tyagi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

3.  Mobile computed tomography for mass fatality investigations.

Authors:  Guy N Rutty; Claire Robinson; Amanda Jeffery; Bruno Morgan
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Accuracies of facial soft tissue depth means for estimating ground truth skin surfaces in forensic craniofacial identification.

Authors:  Carl N Stephan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  "Bochdalek's" skull: morphology report and reconstruction of face.

Authors:  Ivo Klepáček; Pavla Zedníková Malá
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Digital 2D, 2.5D and 3D Methods for Adding Photo-Realistic Textures to 3D Facial Depictions of People from the Past.

Authors:  Mark Roughley; Ching Yiu Jessica Liu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Morphologic alterations ear, nose and lip detected with aging through facial photoanthropometric analysis.

Authors:  R P Baldasso; N P Damascena; A R Deitos; C E Palhares Machado; A Franco; R Nogueira de Oliveira
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2019-09-30

8.  Three individuals, three stories, three burials from medieval Trondheim, Norway.

Authors:  Stian Suppersberger Hamre; Geir Atle Ersland; Valérie Daux; Walther Parson; Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of accuracy and recognition of three-dimensional computerized forensic craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Geraldo Elias Miranda; Caroline Wilkinson; Mark Roughley; Thiago Leite Beaini; Rodolfo Francisco Haltenhoff Melani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Facial Genetics: A Brief Overview.

Authors:  Stephen Richmond; Laurence J Howe; Sarah Lewis; Evie Stergiakouli; Alexei Zhurov
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.