Literature DB >> 1816534

Recognising facial surfaces.

V Bruce1, P Healey, M Burton, T Doyle, A Coombes, A Linney.   

Abstract

The extent to which faces depicted as surfaces devoid of pigmentation and with minimal texture cues ('head models') could be matched with photographs (when unfamiliar) and identified (when familiar) was examined in three experiments. The head models were obtained by scanning the three-dimensional surface of the face with a laser, and by displaying the surface measured in this way by using standard computer-aided design techniques. Performance in all tasks was above chance but far from ceiling. Experiment 1 showed that matching of unfamiliar head models with photographs was affected by the resolution with which the surface was displayed, suggesting that subjects based their decisions, at least in part, on three-dimensional surface structure. Matching accuracy was also affected by other factors to do with the view-points shown in the head models and test photographs, and the type of lighting used to portray the head model. In experiment 2 further evidence for the importance of the nature of the illumination used was obtained, and it was found that the addition of a hairstyle (not that of the target face) did not facilitate matching. In experiment 3 identification of the head models by colleagues of the people shown was compared with identification of photographs where the hair was concealed and eyes were closed. Head models were identified less well than these photographs, suggesting that the difficulties in their recognition are not solely due to the lack of hair. Women's heads were disproportionately difficult to recognise from the head models. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for the use of such three-dimensional head models in forensic and surgical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1816534     DOI: 10.1068/p200755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  7 in total

1.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locus?

Authors:  K A Deffenbacher; J Johanson; T Vetter; A J O'Toole
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

Review 2.  Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding.

Authors:  Sharon Gilad; Ming Meng; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Digital 2D, 2.5D and 3D Methods for Adding Photo-Realistic Textures to 3D Facial Depictions of People from the Past.

Authors:  Mark Roughley; Ching Yiu Jessica Liu
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  A blind accuracy assessment of computer-modeled forensic facial reconstruction using computed tomography data from live subjects.

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson; Chris Rynn; Heather Peters; Myke Taister; Chung How Kau; Stephen Richmond
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.456

6.  Depth structure from asymmetric shading supports face discrimination.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Chin-Mei Chen; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How Well Do Computer-Generated Faces Tap Face Expertise?

Authors:  Kate Crookes; Louise Ewing; Ju-Dith Gildenhuys; Nadine Kloth; William G Hayward; Matt Oxner; Stephen Pond; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.