Literature DB >> 25868652

Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.

Stefaan Blancke1, Frank Van Breusegem2, Geert De Jaeger2, Johan Braeckman3, Marc Van Montagu4.   

Abstract

Public opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) remains strong. By contrast, studies demonstrate again and again that GM crops make a valuable contribution to the development of a sustainable type of agriculture. The discrepancy between public opinion and the scientific evidence requires an explanation. We argue that intuitive expectations about the world render the human mind vulnerable to particular misrepresentations of GMOs. We explain how the involvement of particular intuitions accounts for the popularity, persistence, and typical features of GM opposition and tackle possible objections to our approach. To conclude, we discuss the implications for science education, science communication, and the environmental movement.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cultural attraction; genetically modified organisms; intuitive mind; public opposition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25868652     DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Plant Sci        ISSN: 1360-1385            Impact factor:   18.313


  19 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to enable the adoption of animal biotechnology to sustainably improve global food safety and security.

Authors:  Mark Tizard; Eric Hallerman; Scott Fahrenkrug; Martina Newell-McGloughlin; John Gibson; Frans de Loos; Stefan Wagner; Götz Laible; Jae Yong Han; Michael D'Occhio; Lisa Kelly; John Lowenthal; Kari Gobius; Primal Silva; Caitlin Cooper; Tim Doran
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Are current EU policies on GMOs justified?

Authors:  Andreas T Christiansen; Martin Marchman Andersen; Klemens Kappel
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science: What we know and what scientists can do about it.

Authors:  Antoine Marie; Sacha Altay; Brent Strickland
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths.

Authors:  Stefan Hielscher; Ingo Pies; Vladislav Valentinov; Lioudmila Chatalova
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance.

Authors:  Pierre Jacob; Heribert Hirt; Abdelhafid Bendahmane
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 9.803

6.  Seaweed Extract (Stella Maris®) Activates Innate Immune Responses in Arabidopsis thaliana and Protects Host against Bacterial Pathogens.

Authors:  Jamie Cook; Janie Zhang; Jeff Norrie; Bachar Blal; Zhenyu Cheng
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  All Plant Breeding Technologies Are Equal, but Some Are More Equal Than Others: The Case of GM and Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Luisa Batalha; Francesco Foroni; Brian Joseph Jones
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Towards next generation maggot debridement therapy: transgenic Lucilia sericata larvae that produce and secrete a human growth factor.

Authors:  Rebecca J Linger; Esther J Belikoff; Ying Yan; Fang Li; Holly A Wantuch; Helen L Fitzsimons; Maxwell J Scott
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Not All Skepticism Is Equal: Exploring the Ideological Antecedents of Science Acceptance and Rejection.

Authors:  Bastiaan T Rutjens; Robbie M Sutton; Romy van der Lee
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Restoring public trust in science with the help of the humanities.

Authors:  Ivan Couée
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.