Jalen Alexander1, Jennifer Rose, Lisa Dierker, Philip A Chan, Sarah MacCarthy, Dantrell Simmons, Leandro Mena, Amy Nunn. 1. From the *Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT; †Division of Infectious Diseases, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI; ‡Program on Global Health and Human Rights, Institute for Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; §Jackson State University, Jackson, MS; and ¶Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mississippi has among the highest prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States. Understanding sexual networks can provide insight into risk factors for transmission and guide prevention interventions. METHODS: Participants included 1437 primarily African American (95%) adults presenting for care at an STI clinic in Jackson, Mississippi. Latent class analysis identified underlying population subgroups with unique patterns of response on a comprehensive set of 14 sexual partner variables, such as living with or having a child with a partner, partner dependence and trust, 1-time sexual encounters, multiple main partners, substance use, sexual concurrency, and incarceration. Classes were compared on participant age, sex, sexual orientation, public assistance, lifetime partners, relationship status, and self-reported past-year STI. RESULTS: Three classes emerged. Class 1 (n = 746) participants were less dependent on partners and less likely to live with or have a child with a partner. Class 2 participants (n = 427) endorsed multiple STI risk factors, including partner incarceration, 6 or more lifetime partners, sexual concurrency, 1-time sexual encounters, and substance use at last sex. Class 3 participants (n = 226) were more likely to be in dependent, committed relationships with children. Class 2 had a higher proportion of self-report past-year STIs (36.7%) compared with classes 1 (26.6%) and 3 (26.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Certain partner factors such as incarceration, substance use, and concurrency may contribute to increased STI risk. Partner factors may be useful proxies for STI risks and could be useful questions to include in screening questionnaires in clinical settings.
BACKGROUND: Mississippi has among the highest prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States. Understanding sexual networks can provide insight into risk factors for transmission and guide prevention interventions. METHODS:Participants included 1437 primarily African American (95%) adults presenting for care at an STI clinic in Jackson, Mississippi. Latent class analysis identified underlying population subgroups with unique patterns of response on a comprehensive set of 14 sexual partner variables, such as living with or having a child with a partner, partner dependence and trust, 1-time sexual encounters, multiple main partners, substance use, sexual concurrency, and incarceration. Classes were compared on participant age, sex, sexual orientation, public assistance, lifetime partners, relationship status, and self-reported past-year STI. RESULTS: Three classes emerged. Class 1 (n = 746) participants were less dependent on partners and less likely to live with or have a child with a partner. Class 2 participants (n = 427) endorsed multiple STI risk factors, including partner incarceration, 6 or more lifetime partners, sexual concurrency, 1-time sexual encounters, and substance use at last sex. Class 3 participants (n = 226) were more likely to be in dependent, committed relationships with children. Class 2 had a higher proportion of self-report past-year STIs (36.7%) compared with classes 1 (26.6%) and 3 (26.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Certain partner factors such as incarceration, substance use, and concurrency may contribute to increased STI risk. Partner factors may be useful proxies for STI risks and could be useful questions to include in screening questionnaires in clinical settings.
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Eboni M Taylor; Maria R Khan; Robert J Schwartz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Marina Catallozzi; David L Bell; Mary B Short; Arik V Marcell; Sophia C Ebel; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Catherine H Mercer; Catherine R H Aicken; Clare Tanton; Claudia S Estcourt; M Gary Brook; Frances Keane; Jackie A Cassell Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lena Nilsson Schönnesson; John Atkinson; Mark L Williams; Anne Bowen; Michael W Ross; Sandra C Timpson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Rebecca C Trenz; Michael Scherer; Alexandra Duncan; Paul T Harrell; Anne Gloria Moleko; William W Latimer Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Brandon D L Marshall; Amaya G Perez-Brumer; Sarah MacCarthy; Leandro Mena; Philip A Chan; Caitlin Towey; Nancy Barnett; Sharon Parker; Arti Barnes; Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; Jennifer S Rose; Amy S Nunn Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2016-06
Authors: Sabriya L Linton; Hannah L F Cooper; Ruiyan Luo; Conny Karnes; Kristen Renneker; Danielle F Haley; Emily F Dauria; Josalin Hunter-Jones; Zev Ross; Gina M Wingood; Adaora A Adimora; Loida Bonney; Richard Rothenberg Journal: Arch Sex Behav Date: 2016-02-29
Authors: Nadia Nguyen; Kimberly A Powers; William C Miller; Annie Green Howard; Carolyn T Halpern; James P Hughes; Jing Wang; Rhian Twine; F Xavier Gomez-Olive; Catherine MacPhail; Kathleen Kahn; Audrey E Pettifor Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Nina T Harawa; Russell Brewer; Victoria Buckman; Santhoshini Ramani; Aditya Khanna; Kayo Fujimoto; John A Schneider Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Tassila Salomon; Isabel Gomes; Mina Cintho Ozahata; Carlos Henrique Valente Moreira; Claudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira; Thelma T Gonçalez; Maria Esther Duarte; Carolina Miranda; Anna Bárbara Carneiro Proietti; Ester Sabino; Cesar de Almeida Neto; Brian Custer Journal: Transfusion Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 3.337