Literature DB >> 25867979

Pre-clinical in vivo models for the screening of bone biomaterials for oral/craniofacial indications: focus on small-animal models.

Andreas Stavropoulos, Anton Sculean, Dieter D Bosshardt, Daniel Buser, Björn Klinge.   

Abstract

Preclinical in vivo experimental studies are performed for evaluating proof-of-principle concepts, safety and possible unwanted reactions of candidate bone biomaterials before proceeding to clinical testing. Specifically, models involving small animals have been developed for screening bone biomaterials for their potential to enhance bone formation. No single model can completely recreate the anatomic, physiologic, biomechanic and functional environment of the human mouth and jaws. Relevant aspects regarding physiology, anatomy, dimensions and handling are discussed in this paper to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of small-animal models. Model selection should be based not on the 'expertise' or capacities of the team, but rather on a scientifically solid rationale, and the animal model selected should reflect the question for which an answer is sought. The rationale for using heterotopic or orthotopic testing sites, and intraosseous, periosseous or extraskeletal defect models, is discussed. The paper also discusses the relevance of critical size defect modeling, with focus on calvarial defects in rodents. In addition, the rabbit sinus model and the capsule model in the rat mandible are presented and discussed in detail. All animal experiments should be designed with care and include sample-size and study-power calculations, thus allowing generation of meaningful data. Moreover, animal experiments are subject to ethical approval by the relevant authority. All procedures and the postoperative handling and care, including postoperative analgesics, should follow best practice.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25867979     DOI: 10.1111/prd.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Periodontol 2000        ISSN: 0906-6713            Impact factor:   7.589


  8 in total

1.  Wound models for periodontal and bone regeneration: the role of biologic research.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Iain L C Chapple; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

2.  A canine in vitro model for evaluation of marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell-based bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Tanmay P Gharat; Patricia Diaz-Rodriguez; Josh D Erndt-Marino; Andrea Carolina Jimenez Vergara; Dany J Munoz Pinto; Robert N Bearden; Shannon S Huggins; Melissa Grunlan; W Brian Saunders; Mariah S Hahn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Histological comparison of DBBM and platelet rich fibrin for guided bone regeneration in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Andres Rezuc; Christian Saavedra; Rodrigo Maass; Cristian Poblete; Christian Nappe
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-06-02

4.  "Over-inlay" block graft and differential morphometry: a novel block graft model to study bone regeneration and host-to-graft interfaces in rats.

Authors:  Giulia Ghiacci; Gallia Graiani; Francesca Ravanetti; Simone Lumetti; Edoardo Manfredi; Carlo Galli; Antonio Cacchioli; Guido Maria Macaluso; Roberto Sala
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Determination of the optimal diabetes duration for bone regeneration experiments in an alloxan-induced diabetic rabbit calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Jeong; Bo Hyun Jung; Ki-Yeon Yoo; Heung-Sik Um; Beom-Seok Chang; Jae-Kwan Lee; Won-Youl Choi
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.614

6.  Bone regeneration using a porcine bone substitute collagen composite in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Eisner Salamanca; Chia-Chen Hsu; Haw-Ming Huang; Nai-Chia Teng; Che-Tong Lin; Yu-Hwa Pan; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The Impact of Bioceramic Scaffolds on Bone Regeneration in Preclinical In Vivo Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Sourav Panda; Lucia Schiavon; Stefano Sivolella; Lisa Biasetto; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Pre-screening the intrinsic angiogenic capacity of biomaterials in an optimised ex ovo chorioallantoic membrane model.

Authors:  Nupur Kohli; Prasad Sawadkar; Sonia Ho; Vaibhav Sharma; Martyn Snow; Sean Powell; Maria A Woodruff; Lilian Hook; Elena García-Gareta
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.