INTRODUCTION: Clinic-based tracing efforts and public health surveillance data can provide different information about HIV care status for the same patients. The relative yield and how best to use these sources to identify and reengage out-of-care patients is unknown. METHODS: At a large public HIV clinic in San Francisco, we selected a 10% random sample of active patients who were at least 210 days "late" for an HIV primary care visit as of April 1, 2013, for clinic-based outreach. Patients were considered out of care if they did not have an HIV primary care visit in the 210 days before April 1, 2013. We then matched the sample with the San Francisco Department of Public Health HIV surveillance registry. Patients with a CD4 or viral load result in the 210-day period were classified as in care. We compared results from both sources and estimated the cumulative incidence of disengagement from care for the full cohort of clinic patients. RESULTS: Of 940 patients lost to follow-up, 95 were sampled. Clinic tracing found 60 (63%) in care, 23 (24%) not located, 9 (10%) out of care, 2 (2%) incarcerated, and 1 (1%) had died. Of 42 individuals surveillance classified as out of care, tracing found 22 (52%) were in care. Of 52 patients found to be in care by surveillance, 12 (23%) were out of care by clinic tracing or unable to be located. The naive estimate of the cumulative incidence of disengagement from care at 3 years for the active clinic cohort was 41.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 37.6 to 44.5]. The use of surveillance data reduced this estimate to 12.7% (95% CI: 18.2 to 25.4), and when further corrected using tracing outcomes, the estimate dropped to only 6.4% (95% CI: 3.4 to 9.4). CONCLUSIONS: Clinic-based tracing and surveillance data together provide a better understanding of care status than either method alone. Using surveillance data to inform clinic-based outreach efforts may be an effective strategy, although tracing efforts are most likely to be successful if conducted in real time.
INTRODUCTION: Clinic-based tracing efforts and public health surveillance data can provide different information about HIV care status for the same patients. The relative yield and how best to use these sources to identify and reengage out-of-care patients is unknown. METHODS: At a large public HIV clinic in San Francisco, we selected a 10% random sample of active patients who were at least 210 days "late" for an HIV primary care visit as of April 1, 2013, for clinic-based outreach. Patients were considered out of care if they did not have an HIV primary care visit in the 210 days before April 1, 2013. We then matched the sample with the San Francisco Department of Public Health HIV surveillance registry. Patients with a CD4 or viral load result in the 210-day period were classified as in care. We compared results from both sources and estimated the cumulative incidence of disengagement from care for the full cohort of clinic patients. RESULTS: Of 940 patients lost to follow-up, 95 were sampled. Clinic tracing found 60 (63%) in care, 23 (24%) not located, 9 (10%) out of care, 2 (2%) incarcerated, and 1 (1%) had died. Of 42 individuals surveillance classified as out of care, tracing found 22 (52%) were in care. Of 52 patients found to be in care by surveillance, 12 (23%) were out of care by clinic tracing or unable to be located. The naive estimate of the cumulative incidence of disengagement from care at 3 years for the active clinic cohort was 41.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 37.6 to 44.5]. The use of surveillance data reduced this estimate to 12.7% (95% CI: 18.2 to 25.4), and when further corrected using tracing outcomes, the estimate dropped to only 6.4% (95% CI: 3.4 to 9.4). CONCLUSIONS: Clinic-based tracing and surveillance data together provide a better understanding of care status than either method alone. Using surveillance data to inform clinic-based outreach efforts may be an effective strategy, although tracing efforts are most likely to be successful if conducted in real time.
Authors: David W Dowdy; Elvin H Geng; Katerina A Christopoulos; James S Kahn; C Bradley Hare; Daniel Wlodarczyk; Diane V Havlir Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: David Evans; Dana Van Gorder; Stephen F Morin; Wayne T Steward; Stuart Gaffney; Edwin D Charlebois Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Thomas P Giordano; Allen L Gifford; A Clinton White; Maria E Suarez-Almazor; Linda Rabeneck; Christine Hartman; Lisa I Backus; Larry A Mole; Robert O Morgan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-04-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Manya Magnus; Jane Herwehe; DeAnn Gruber; Wayne Wilbright; Elizabeth Shepard; Amir Abrams; Joe Foxhood; Luis Smith; Ke Xiao; Kathryn DeYoung; Michael Kaiser Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Katerina A Christopoulos; Amina D Massey; Andrea M Lopez; Elvin H Geng; Mallory O Johnson; Christopher D Pilcher; Hegla Fielding; Carol Dawson-Rose Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: H Irene Hall; Emma L Frazier; Philip Rhodes; David R Holtgrave; Carolyn Furlow-Parmley; Tian Tang; Kristen Mahle Gray; Stacy M Cohen; Jonathan Mermin; Jacek Skarbinski Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jane Herwehe; Wayne Wilbright; Amir Abrams; Susan Bergson; Joseph Foxhood; Michael Kaiser; Luis Smith; Ke Xiao; Amy Zapata; Manya Magnus Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Julia C Dombrowski; Joanna Bove; James C Roscoe; Jessica Harvill; Caislin L Firth; Shireen Khormooji; Jason Carr; Peter Choi; Courtney Smith; Sean D Schafer; Matthew R Golden Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Huldrych F Günthard; Michael S Saag; Constance A Benson; Carlos del Rio; Joseph J Eron; Joel E Gallant; Jennifer F Hoy; Michael J Mugavero; Paul E Sax; Melanie A Thompson; Rajesh T Gandhi; Raphael J Landovitz; Davey M Smith; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alan E Greenberg; David W Purcell; Christopher M Gordon; Rebecca J Barasky; Carlos del Rio Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Eva A Enns; Cavan S Reilly; Beth A Virnig; Karen Baker; Nicholas Vogenthaler; Keith Henry Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Mabel Padilla; Christine L Mattson; Susan Scheer; Chi-Chi N Udeagu; Susan E Buskin; Alison J Hughes; Thomas Jaenicke; Amy Rock Wohl; Joseph Prejean; Stanley C Wei Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Lytt I Gardner; Gary Marks; Unnati Patel; Edward Cachay; Tracey E Wilson; Michael Stirratt; Allan Rodriguez; Meg Sullivan; Jeanne C Keruly; Thomas P Giordano Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Irene Kuo; Tao Liu; Rudy Patrick; Claudia Trezza; Lauri Bazerman; Breana J Uhrig Castonguay; James Peterson; Ann Kurth; Curt G Beckwith Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-04