John Beltrami1,2, Odessa Dubose1, Reginald Carson1, Janet C Cleveland1. 1. 1 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. 2 Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: From 2012 through 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided funding to 5 health departments for demonstration projects using HIV surveillance data to link people with newly diagnosed HIV to care. We assessed how well these health departments established linkage to care, how the demonstration projects helped them with this work, and if they sustained these activities after CDC funding ended. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained quantitative and qualitative data on linkage-to-care activities from health department communications and progress reports submitted to CDC. We calculated and combined linkage-to-care results for the 5 health departments, and we compared these results with the combined linkage-to-care results for 61 health departments that received CDC funding for routine HIV prevention activities (eg, HIV testing, linkage to and reengagement in HIV care, HIV partner services) and for the same 5 health departments when they used only routine HIV prevention activities for linkage to care. RESULTS: Of 1269 people with a new HIV diagnosis at the 5 health departments, 1124 (89%) were linked to care, a result that exceeded the 2010-2015 National HIV/AIDS Strategy goal (85%), the CDC Funding Opportunity Announcement performance standard (80%), and combined results for the 61 health departments (63%) and the same 5 health departments (66%) using routine HIV prevention activities. Benefits of the projects were improved collaboration and coordination and more accurate, up-to-date surveillance data. All health departments continued linkage-to-care activities after funding ended. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Using HIV surveillance data to link people with HIV to care resulted in substantial clinical and public health benefits. Our observations underscore the importance of collaboration among medical providers, public health staff members, community-based organizations, and people with HIV to ensure the best possible clinical and public health outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: From 2012 through 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided funding to 5 health departments for demonstration projects using HIV surveillance data to link people with newly diagnosed HIV to care. We assessed how well these health departments established linkage to care, how the demonstration projects helped them with this work, and if they sustained these activities after CDC funding ended. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained quantitative and qualitative data on linkage-to-care activities from health department communications and progress reports submitted to CDC. We calculated and combined linkage-to-care results for the 5 health departments, and we compared these results with the combined linkage-to-care results for 61 health departments that received CDC funding for routine HIV prevention activities (eg, HIV testing, linkage to and reengagement in HIV care, HIV partner services) and for the same 5 health departments when they used only routine HIV prevention activities for linkage to care. RESULTS: Of 1269 people with a new HIV diagnosis at the 5 health departments, 1124 (89%) were linked to care, a result that exceeded the 2010-2015 National HIV/AIDS Strategy goal (85%), the CDC Funding Opportunity Announcement performance standard (80%), and combined results for the 61 health departments (63%) and the same 5 health departments (66%) using routine HIV prevention activities. Benefits of the projects were improved collaboration and coordination and more accurate, up-to-date surveillance data. All health departments continued linkage-to-care activities after funding ended. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Using HIV surveillance data to link people with HIV to care resulted in substantial clinical and public health benefits. Our observations underscore the importance of collaboration among medical providers, public health staff members, community-based organizations, and people with HIV to ensure the best possible clinical and public health outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV; engagement; linkage to care; public health practice; surveillance data
Authors: David Evans; Dana Van Gorder; Stephen F Morin; Wayne T Steward; Stuart Gaffney; Edwin D Charlebois Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jeanne Bertolli; R Luke Shouse; Linda Beer; Eduardo Valverde; Jennifer Fagan; Samuel M Jenness; Afework Wogayehu; Christopher Johnson; Alan Neaigus; Daniel Hillman; Maria Courogen; Kathleen A Brady; Barbara Bolden Journal: Open AIDS J Date: 2012-09-07
Authors: Julia C Dombrowski; James W Carey; Nicole Pitts; Jason Craw; Arin Freeman; Matthew R Golden; Jeanne Bertolli Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Mara Buchbinder; Colleen Blue; Stuart Rennie; Eric Juengst; Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein; David L Rosen Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2020-09-04