Rawan Tarawneh1, Denise Head2, Samantha Allison3, Virginia Buckles4, Anne M Fagan1, Jack H Ladenson5, John C Morris6, David M Holtzman1. 1. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri2Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri3The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's. 2. The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri5Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri6Department of. 3. Department of Psychology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 4. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri3The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 5. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri. 6. Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri3The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri7Department of.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Measures of neuronal loss are likely good surrogates for clinical and radiological disease progression in Alzheimer disease (AD). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of neuronal injury or neurodegeneration may offer usefulness in predicting disease progression and guiding outcome assessments and prognostic decisions in clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies. Visinin-like protein 1 (VILIP-1) has demonstrated potential usefulness as a marker of neuronal injury in AD. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of CSF VILIP-1, tau, p-tau181, and Aβ42 levels in predicting rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy in early AD and cognitively normal control subjects over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal observational study of brain atrophy in participants with early AD and cognitively normal controls. Study participants had baseline CSF biomarker measurements and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging assessments for a mean follow-up period of 2 to 3 years. Mixed linear models assessed the ability of standardized baseline CSF biomarker measures to predict rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy over the follow-up period. The setting was The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis. Participants (mean age, 72.6 years) were individuals with a clinical diagnosis of very mild AD (n = 23) and cognitively normal controls (n = 64) who were enrolled in longitudinal studies of healthy aging and dementia. The study dates were 2000 to 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Correlations between baseline CSF biomarker measures and rates of whole-brain or regional atrophy in the AD and control cohorts over the follow-up period. RESULTS: Baseline CSF VILIP-1, tau, and p-tau181 levels (but not Aβ42 levels) predicted rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy in AD over the follow-up period. Baseline CSF VILIP-1 levels predicted whole-brain (P = .006), hippocampal (P = .01), and entorhinal (P = .001) atrophy rates at least as well as tau and p-tau181 in early AD. Cognitively normal controls whose CSF VILIP-1, tau, or p-tau181 levels were in the upper tercile had higher rates of whole-brain (P = .02, P = .003, and P = .02, respectively), hippocampal (P = .001, P = .01, and P = .02, respectively), and entorhinal (P = .007, P = .01, and P = .01, respectively) atrophy compared with those whose levels were in the lower 2 terciles. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cerebrospinal fluid VILIP-1 levels predict rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy similarly to tau and p-tau181 and may provide a useful CSF biomarker surrogate for neurodegeneration in early symptomatic and preclinical AD.
IMPORTANCE: Measures of neuronal loss are likely good surrogates for clinical and radiological disease progression in Alzheimer disease (AD). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of neuronal injury or neurodegeneration may offer usefulness in predicting disease progression and guiding outcome assessments and prognostic decisions in clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies. Visinin-like protein 1 (VILIP-1) has demonstrated potential usefulness as a marker of neuronal injury in AD. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of CSFVILIP-1, tau, p-tau181, and Aβ42 levels in predicting rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy in early AD and cognitively normal control subjects over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal observational study of brain atrophy in participants with early AD and cognitively normal controls. Study participants had baseline CSF biomarker measurements and longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging assessments for a mean follow-up period of 2 to 3 years. Mixed linear models assessed the ability of standardized baseline CSF biomarker measures to predict rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy over the follow-up period. The setting was The Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis. Participants (mean age, 72.6 years) were individuals with a clinical diagnosis of very mild AD (n = 23) and cognitively normal controls (n = 64) who were enrolled in longitudinal studies of healthy aging and dementia. The study dates were 2000 to 2010. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Correlations between baseline CSF biomarker measures and rates of whole-brain or regional atrophy in the AD and control cohorts over the follow-up period. RESULTS: Baseline CSFVILIP-1, tau, and p-tau181 levels (but not Aβ42 levels) predicted rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy in AD over the follow-up period. Baseline CSFVILIP-1 levels predicted whole-brain (P = .006), hippocampal (P = .01), and entorhinal (P = .001) atrophy rates at least as well as tau and p-tau181 in early AD. Cognitively normal controls whose CSFVILIP-1, tau, or p-tau181 levels were in the upper tercile had higher rates of whole-brain (P = .02, P = .003, and P = .02, respectively), hippocampal (P = .001, P = .01, and P = .02, respectively), and entorhinal (P = .007, P = .01, and P = .01, respectively) atrophy compared with those whose levels were in the lower 2 terciles. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cerebrospinal fluid VILIP-1 levels predict rates of whole-brain and regional atrophy similarly to tau and p-tau181 and may provide a useful CSF biomarker surrogate for neurodegeneration in early symptomatic and preclinical AD.
Authors: N Andreasen; C Hesse; P Davidsson; L Minthon; A Wallin; B Winblad; H Vanderstichele; E Vanmechelen; K Blennow Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 1999-06
Authors: Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale Journal: Neuron Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Rawan Tarawneh; Gina D'Angelo; Elizabeth Macy; Chengjie Xiong; Deborah Carter; Nigel J Cairns; Anne M Fagan; Denise Head; Mark A Mintun; Jack H Ladenson; Jin-Moo Lee; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: John G Csernansky; Julia Hamstra; Lei Wang; Daniel McKeel; Joseph L Price; Mokhtar Gado; John C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2004 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: J C Morris; K Blennow; L Froelich; A Nordberg; H Soininen; G Waldemar; L-O Wahlund; B Dubois Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Rahul S Desikan; Linda K McEvoy; Wesley K Thompson; Dominic Holland; James B Brewer; Paul S Aisen; Reisa A Sperling; Anders M Dale Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2012-06
Authors: John R Cirrito; Patrick C May; Mark A O'Dell; Jennie W Taylor; Maia Parsadanian; Jeffrey W Cramer; James E Audia; Jeffrey S Nissen; Kelly R Bales; Steven M Paul; Ronald B DeMattos; David M Holtzman Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Rawan Tarawneh; Gina D'Angelo; Dan Crimmins; Elizabeth Herries; Terry Griest; Anne M Fagan; Gregory J Zipfel; Jack H Ladenson; John C Morris; David M Holtzman Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-05-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Fardin Nabizadeh; Mohammad Balabandian; Mohammad Reza Rostami; Richard T Ward; Niloufar Ahmadi; Mahsa Pourhamzeh Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Renaud La Joie; Adrienne V Visani; Suzanne L Baker; Jesse A Brown; Viktoriya Bourakova; Jungho Cha; Kiran Chaudhary; Lauren Edwards; Leonardo Iaccarino; Mustafa Janabi; Orit H Lesman-Segev; Zachary A Miller; David C Perry; James P O'Neil; Julie Pham; Julio C Rojas; Howard J Rosen; William W Seeley; Richard M Tsai; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Elizabeth E Moore; Katherine A Gifford; Omair A Khan; Dandan Liu; Kimberly R Pechman; Lealani Mae Y Acosta; Susan P Bell; Maxim Turchan; Bennett A Landman; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Timothy J Hohman; Angela L Jefferson Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Sarah E Keuss; William Coath; Jennifer M Nicholas; Teresa Poole; Josephine Barnes; David M Cash; Christopher A Lane; Thomas D Parker; Ashvini Keshavan; Sarah M Buchanan; Aaron Z Wagen; Mathew Storey; Matthew Harris; Ian B Malone; Carole H Sudre; Kirsty Lu; Sarah-Naomi James; Rebecca Street; David L Thomas; John C Dickson; Heidi Murray-Smith; Andrew Wong; Tamar Freiberger; Sebastian Crutch; Marcus Richards; Nick C Fox; Jonathan M Schott Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 11.800