Literature DB >> 25867006

Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills: Differentiating Animate Surgical Skill Through the Wisdom of Crowds.

Daniel Holst1, Timothy M Kowalewski2, Lee W White3, Timothy C Brand4, Jonathan D Harper5, Mathew D Sorensen5, Mireille Truong6, Khara Simpson6, Alyssa Tanaka6, Roger Smith6, Thomas S Lendvay5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Objective quantification of surgical skill is imperative as we enter a healthcare environment of quality improvement and performance-based reimbursement. The gold standard tools are infrequently used due to time-intensiveness, cost inefficiency, and lack of standard practices. We hypothesized that valid performance scores of surgical skill can be obtained through crowdsourcing.
METHODS: Twelve surgeons of varying robotic surgical experience performed live porcine robot-assisted urinary bladder closures. Blinded video-recorded performances were scored by expert surgeon graders and by Amazon's Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing crowd workers using the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills tool assessing five technical skills domains. Seven expert graders and 50 unique Mechanical Turkers (each paid $0.75/survey) evaluated each video. Global assessment scores were analyzed for correlation and agreement.
RESULTS: Six hundred Mechanical Turkers completed the surveys in less than 5 hours, while seven surgeon graders took 14 days. The duration of video clips ranged from 2 to 11 minutes. The correlation coefficient between the Turkers' and expert graders' scores was 0.95 and Cronbach's Alpha was 0.93. Inter-rater reliability among the surgeon graders was 0.89.
CONCLUSION: Crowdsourcing surgical skills assessment yielded rapid inexpensive agreement with global performance scores given by expert surgeon graders. The crowdsourcing method may provide surgical educators and medical institutions with a boundless number of procedural skills assessors to efficiently quantify technical skills for use in trainee advancement and hospital quality improvement.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25867006     DOI: 10.1089/end.2015.0104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  18 in total

1.  C-SATS: Assessing Surgical Skills Among Urology Residency Applicants.

Authors:  Simone L Vernez; Victor Huynh; Kathryn Osann; Zhamshid Okhunov; Jaime Landman; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Large-scale medical image annotation with crowd-powered algorithms.

Authors:  Eric Heim; Tobias Roß; Alexander Seitel; Keno März; Bram Stieltjes; Matthias Eisenmann; Johannes Lebert; Jasmin Metzger; Gregor Sommer; Alexander W Sauter; Fides Regina Schwartz; Andreas Termer; Felix Wagner; Hannes Götz Kenngott; Lena Maier-Hein
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-08

3.  Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shanley B Deal; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Dana Telem; Robert D Fanelli; Marian McDonald; Michael Ujiki; L Michael Brunt; Adnan A Alseidi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  How Do Thresholds of Principle and Preference Influence Surgeon Assessments of Learner Performance?

Authors:  Tavis Apramian; Sayra Cristancho; Alp Sener; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Video assessment of laparoscopic skills by novices and experts: implications for surgical education.

Authors:  Celine Yeung; Brian Carrillo; Victor Pope; Shahob Hosseinpour; J Ted Gerstle; Georges Azzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Structured learning for robotic surgery utilizing a proficiency score: a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Thomas Bottyan; Thomas G Clifford; Sarfaraz Serang; Zein K Nakhoda; Swar H Shah; Hana Yokoi; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.

Authors:  Karoline Mortensen; Taylor L Hughes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Crowdsourced versus expert evaluations of the vesico-urethral anastomosis in the robotic radical prostatectomy: is one superior at discriminating differences in automated performance metrics?

Authors:  Paul J Oh; Jian Chen; David Hatcher; Hooman Djaladat; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-04-30

9.  A Vision for Using Simulation & Virtual Coaching to Improve the Community Practice of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery.

Authors:  Geb W Thomas; Steven Long; Marcus Tatum; Timothy Kowalewski; Dominik Mattioli; J Lawrence Marsh; Heather R Kowalski; Matthew D Karam; Joan E Bechtold; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

Review 10.  Crowdsourcing: an overview and applications to ophthalmology.

Authors:  Xueyang Wang; Lucy Mudie; Christopher J Brady
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.