| Literature DB >> 25866554 |
Marianne E McMaster1, Amanda Jane Lee2, R Geoffrey Burwell3.
Abstract
To our knowledge there are no publications that have evaluated physical activities in relation to the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) other than sports scolioses. In a preliminary longitudinal case-control study, mother and child were questioned and the children examined by one observer. The aim of the study was to examine possible risk factors for AIS. Two study groups were assessed for physical activities: 79 children diagnosed as having progressive AIS at one spinal deformity centre (66 girls, 13 boys) and a Control Group of 77 school children (66 girls, 11 boys), the selection involving six criteria. A structured history of physical activities was obtained, every child allocated to a socioeconomic group and examined for toe touching. Unlike the Patients, the Controls were not X-rayed and were examined for surface vertical spinous process asymmetry (VSPA). Statistical analyses showed progressive AIS to be positively associated with social deprivation, early introduction to indoor heated swimming pools and ability to toe touch. AIS is negatively associated with participation in dance, skating, gymnastics or karate and football or hockey classes, which might suggest preventive possibilities. There is a significantly increased independent odds of AIS in children who went to an indoor heated swimming pool within the first year of life (odds ratio 3.88, 95% CI 1.77-8.48; p = 0·001). Furthermore fourteen (61%) Controls with VSPA compared with 9 (17%) Controls without VSPA had been introduced to the swimming pool within their first year of life (P < 0.001). Early exposure to indoor heated swimming pools for both AIS and VSPA, suggests that the AIS findings do not result from sample selection.Entities:
Keywords: Etiology; Physical activities; Risk factors; Scoliosis; Swimming pools; Toe touching
Year: 2015 PMID: 25866554 PMCID: PMC4393567 DOI: 10.1186/s13013-015-0029-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scoliosis ISSN: 1748-7161
Figure 1Frequency distribution of the curve types of the AIS patients.
Association between risk factor and asymmetry
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Carstairs’ deprivation score | 17.7 (0.001) | |||
| 1 | 38 | 62 | 1.00 | |
| 2 | 28 | 6 | 7.04 (2.41 – 20.6) | |
| 3 | 18 | 9 | 3.20 (1.16 – 8.83) | |
| 4 or 5 | 16 | 22 | 1.22 (0.52 – 2.87) | |
| Carstairs’ deprivation score | 0.16 (0.689) | |||
| 1-2 | 66 | 69 | 1.00 | |
| 3-5 | 34 | 31 | 1.15 (0.59 – 2.24) | |
| Carstairs’ deprivation score | 9.56 (0.002) | |||
| 1 | 38 | 62 | 1.00 | |
| 2-5 | 62 | 38 | 2.70 (1.42 – 5.16) | |
| Asymmetry in mother’s back | 1 | 4 | ----- (0.364)+ | 0.32 (0.03 – 3.11) |
| Hamstring muscles not tight/ability to touch toes | 80 | 60 | 6.49 (0.011) | 2.65 (1.30 – 5.41) |
| Poor social skills | 1 | 3 | 0.00 (0.982) | 0.48 (0.04 – 5.41) |
| No previous cycling | 0 | 0 | --- | --- |
| No previous attendance at dance classes (girls only) | 44 | 26 | 4.04 (0.045) | 2.26 (1.08 – 4.71) |
| No previous gymnastics/karate | 76 | 53 | 7.84 (0.005) | 2.77 (1.40 – 5.49) |
| No previous skating | 73 | 32 | 24.6 (<0.001) | 5.74 (2.88 – 11.5) |
| No previous horse riding | 82 | 60 | 8.58 (0.003) | 3.13 (1.50 – 6.53) |
| No previous playing football/hockey | 65 | 55 | 1.23 (0.267) | 1.52 (0.80 – 2.89) |
| Introduced to swimming pool within first year of life | 58 | 31 | 10.5 (0.001) | 3.08 (1.60 – 5.94) |
| Ability to swim by age 10 years | 56 | 56 | 0.00 (0.999) | 0.99 (0.53 – 1.87) |
| Introduced to public pool within first year (≥8) | 57 | 30 | 10.6 (0.001) | 3.11 (1.61 – 6.02) |
| Introduced to public pool within first year (≥12) | 54 | 29 | 9.69 (0.002) | 2.99 (1.54 – 5.80) |
| Introduced to public pool within first year (≥24) | 34 | 23 | 1.72 (0.190) | 1.70 (0.84 – 3.44) |
*All patients and controls completed every question, therefore the results are presented for 79 cases and 77 controls (with the exception of dancing classes which only applied to girls – 66 patients and 66 controls).
+Fisher’s exact test used rather than χ2 test due to small numbers.
Age at which children were first introduced to an indoor heated swimming pool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1st year | 46 (58.2) | 24 (31.2) | 16 (64.0) | 8 (15.4) |
| 2nd year | 6 (7.6) | 9 (11.7) | 1 (4.0) | 8 (15.4) |
| 3rd year | 4 (5.1) | 3 (3.9) | 2 (8.0) | 1 (1.9) |
| 4th year | 4 (5.1) | 5 (6.5) | 2 (8.0) | 3 (5.8) |
| 5th year | 7 (8.9) | 7 (9.1) | 1 (4.0) | 6 (11.5) |
| 6th year | 2 (2.5) | 14 (18.2) | 3 (12.0) | 11 (21.2) |
| 7th year or later | 7 (8.9) | 15 (19.5) | 0 (0.0) | 15 (28.8) |
| Never in pool | 3 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Can swim by age 10 years | 44 (55.7) | 43 (55.8) | 19 (76.0) | 24 (46.2) |
Significant independent predictors of asymmetry (temporary activities included but touching toes excluded) using Carstairs 1 versus 2–5 and eight swimming visits
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −7.47 (1.35) | 30.7 (<0.001) | --- |
| No previous skating | 1.63 (0.39) | 17.6 (<0.001) | 5.09 (2.38–10.9) |
| Introduced to swimming pool within first year (≥8) | 1.36 (0.40) | 11.5 (0.001) | 3.88 (1.77–8.48) |
| Carstairs’ Deprivation score (2–5 = most deprived) | 1.02 (0.39) | 6.96 (0.008) | 2.78 (1.30–5.96) |
| No previous gymnastics/karate | 1.03 (0.41) | 6.33 (0.012) | 2.79 (1.25–6.20) |
Significant independent predictors of asymmetry (temporary activities and touching toes excluded) using Carstairs 1 versus 2–5 and eight swimming visits
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | −6.73 (1.32) | 25.9 (<0.001) | --- |
| Introduced to swimming pool within first year (≥8) | 1.37 (0.38) | 13.1 (<0.001) | 3.91 (1.87–8.20) |
| No previous gymnastics/karate | 1.26 (0.39) | 10.7 (0.001) | 3.53 (1.66–7.53) |
| Carstairs’ Deprivation score (2–5 = most deprived) | 1.18 (0.37) | 10.4 (0.001) | 3.27 (1.59–6.72) |
| No previous football/hockey | 0.76 (0.38) | 4.05 (0.044) | 2.14 (1.02–4.49) |