Literature DB >> 25866350

Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening policies using simulation.

Y Gocgun1, D Banjevic2, S Taghipour3, N Montgomery2, B J Harvey4, A K S Jardine2, A B Miller4.   

Abstract

In this paper, we study breast cancer screening policies using computer simulation. We developed a multi-state Markov model for breast cancer progression, considering both the screening and treatment stages of breast cancer. The parameters of our model were estimated through data from the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study as well as data in the relevant literature. Using computer simulation, we evaluated various screening policies to study the impact of mammography screening for age-based subpopulations in Canada. We also performed sensitivity analysis to examine the impact of certain parameters on number of deaths and total costs. The analysis comparing screening policies reveals that a policy in which women belonging to the 40-49 age group are not screened, whereas those belonging to the 50-59 and 60-69 age groups are screened once every 5 years, outperforms others with respect to cost per life saved. Our analysis also indicates that increasing the screening frequencies for the 50-59 and 60-69 age groups decrease mortality, and that the average number of deaths generally decreases with an increase in screening frequency. We found that screening annually for all age groups is associated with the highest costs per life saved. Our analysis thus reveals that cost per life saved increases with an increase in screening frequency.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Computer simulation; Markov models

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25866350     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  6 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of mammography from a publicly funded health care system perspective.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Natasha K Stout; Anna N A Tosteson; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-02-08

2.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Hans Krueger; Sylvia Robinson; Trevor Hancock; Richard Birtwhistle; Jane A Buxton; Bonnie Henry; Jennifer Scarr; John J Spinelli
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 3.  Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Interventions.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.

Authors:  Fredrik Strand; Keith Humphreys; Abbas Cheddad; Sven Törnberg; Edward Azavedo; John Shepherd; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography in Vietnamese women.

Authors:  Chi Phuong Nguyen; Eddy M M Adang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cost-effectiveness of screening mammography in a low income country: a Markov simulation analysis.

Authors:  Segni Kejela
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 1.930

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.