| Literature DB >> 25865813 |
Carlos J Lavernia1, David A Iacobelli2, Larry Brooks3, Jesus M Villa2.
Abstract
We estimated the cost of Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years gained according to preoperative disease severity. We studied 159 primary unilateral THA, mean follow-up: 4 years. A median split of preoperative WOMAC scores was done to set apart a low (better) and a high (worse) score group. The groups with worse preoperative WOMAC were consistently associated with a less cost-effective intervention. The highest mean cost-effectiveness was achieved by patients with better WOMAC-total ($8256.32/QALY-gained). As patients aged, the cost-effectiveness of THA decreased. Patients 75 years of age or older and with worse scores had the least cost-effective interventions ($25,937.33/QALY-gained). THA remains a very cost-effective intervention even when performed in older "sicker" patients. Waiting for the patient to deteriorate will make the intervention more "expensive".Entities:
Keywords: QALY; cost-effectiveness; cost–utility analysis; preoperative; quality of life; total hip arthroplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25865813 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Arthroplasty ISSN: 0883-5403 Impact factor: 4.757