Literature DB >> 29071040

Cost-effectiveness of timely versus delayed primary total hip replacement in Germany: A social health insurance perspective.

Ruben E Mujica-Mota1, Leala K Watson1, Rosanna Tarricone2, Marcus Jäger3.   

Abstract

Without clinical guideline on the optimal timing for primary total hip replacement (THR), patients often receive the operation with delay. Delaying THR may negatively affect long-term health-related quality of life, but its economic effects are unclear. We evaluated the costs and health benefits of timely primary THR for functionally independent adult patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) compared to non-surgical therapy followed by THR after progression to functional dependence (delayed THR), and non-surgical therapy alone (Medical Therapy), from a German Social Health Insurance (SHI) perspective. Data from hip arthroplasty registers and a systematic review of the published literature were used to populate a tunnel-state modified Markov lifetime model of OA treatment in Germany. A 5% annual discount rate was applied to costs (2013 prices) and health outcomes (Quality Adjusted Life Years, QALY). The expected future average cost of timely THR, delayed THR and medical therapy in women at age 55 were €27,474, €27,083 and €28,263, and QALYs were 20.7, 16.7, and 10.3, respectively. QALY differences were entirely due to health-related quality of life differences. The discounted cost per QALY gained by timely over delayed (median delay of 11 years) THR was €1270 and €1338 in women treated at age 55 and age 65, respectively, and slightly higher than this for men. Timely THR is cost-effective, generating large quality of life benefits for patients at low additional cost to the SHI. With declining healthcare budgets, research is needed to identify the characteristics of those able to benefit the most from timely THR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Decision analysis; Delay; Germany; Total hip replacement

Year:  2017        PMID: 29071040      PMCID: PMC5641833          DOI: 10.4081/or.2017.7161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)        ISSN: 2035-8164


  77 in total

1.  Hip and knee replacement in Germany and the USA: analysis of individual inpatient data from German and US hospitals for the years 2005 to 2011.

Authors:  Annelene Wengler; Ulrike Nimptsch; Thomas Mansky
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  The dimensions of health outcomes: the health assessment questionnaire, disability and pain scales.

Authors:  J F Fries; P W Spitz; D Y Young
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Disability and not osteoarthritis predicts cardiovascular disease: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  T A Hoeven; M J G Leening; P J Bindels; M Castaño-Betancourt; J B van Meurs; O H Franco; M Kavousi; A Hofman; M A Ikram; J C M Witteman; S M Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Health state utility in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Vanessa W Chiu; James D Slover; Igor Immerman; James G Kahn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  [Analysis of extent and quality of treatment of arthrosis patients based on routine data from German statutory health insurance].

Authors:  C Willer; E Swart
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Survival analysis of the Harris-Galante I acetabular cup.

Authors:  P Böhm; R Bösche
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-05

7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R W Chang; J M Pellisier; G B Hazen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The impact of preoperative patient characteristics on the cost-effectiveness of total hip replacement: a cohort study.

Authors:  Matthias Vogl; Rainer Wilkesmann; Christian Lausmann; Werner Plötz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Replacement of endoprosthetic implants within a two years follow-up period: a statutory health insurance routine data analysis.

Authors:  Roland Linder; Hardy Müller; Brigitte Grenz-Farenholtz; Caroline Wagner; Martin Stockheim; Frank Verheyen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  A prospective randomized peri- and post-operative comparison of the minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the lateral approach.

Authors:  Stefan Landgraeber; Henning Quitmann; Sebastian Güth; Marcel Haversath; Wojciech Kowalczyk; Andrés Kecskeméthy; Hansjörg Heep; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-07-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Health and Economic Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Fusion for Children With Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Authors:  Jody L Lin; Daniel S Tawfik; Ribhav Gupta; Meghan Imrie; Eran Bendavid; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2020-03

2.  Dedicated orthopaedic elective unit: our experience from a district general hospital.

Authors:  Vinay Joseph; Joseph Gamal Estawro Boktor; Kunal Roy; Peter M Lewis
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Resuming elective hip and knee arthroplasty after the first phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: the European Hip Society and European Knee Associates recommendations.

Authors:  N P Kort; E Gómez Barrena; M Bédard; S Donell; J-A Epinette; B Gomberg; M T Hirschmann; P Indelli; Ismail Khosravi; T Karachalios; M C Liebensteiner; B Stuyts; R Tandogan; B Violante; L Zagra; M Thaler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.