Literature DB >> 25864466

Environmental diversity as a surrogate for species representation.

Paul Beier1, Fábio Suzart de Albuquerque2.   

Abstract

Because many species have not been described and most species ranges have not been mapped, conservation planners often use surrogates for conservation planning, but evidence for surrogate effectiveness is weak. Surrogates are well-mapped features such as soil types, landforms, occurrences of an easily observed taxon (discrete surrogates), and well-mapped environmental conditions (continuous surrogate). In the context of reserve selection, the idea is that a set of sites selected to span diversity in the surrogate will efficiently represent most species. Environmental diversity (ED) is a rarely used surrogate that selects sites to efficiently span multivariate ordination space. Because it selects across continuous environmental space, ED should perform better than discrete surrogates (which necessarily ignore within-bin and between-bin heterogeneity). Despite this theoretical advantage, ED appears to have performed poorly in previous tests of its ability to identify 50 × 50 km cells that represented vertebrates in Western Europe. Using an improved implementation of ED, we retested ED on Western European birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and combined terrestrial vertebrates. We also tested ED on data sets for plants of Zimbabwe, birds of Spain, and birds of Arizona (United States). Sites selected using ED represented European mammals no better than randomly selected cells, but they represented species in the other 7 data sets with 20% to 84% effectiveness. This far exceeds the performance in previous tests of ED, and exceeds the performance of most discrete surrogates. We believe ED performed poorly in previous tests because those tests considered only a few candidate explanatory variables and used suboptimal forms of ED's selection algorithm. We suggest future work on ED focus on analyses at finer grain sizes more relevant to conservation decisions, explore the effect of selecting the explanatory variables most associated with species turnover, and investigate whether nonclimate abiotic variables can provide useful surrogates in an ED framework.
© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  complementareidad; complementarity; conservation planning; diversidad ambiental; environmental diversity; minisum; planeación de la conservación; species accumulation index; surrogates; sustitutos; índice de acumulación de especies

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25864466     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Downscaling patterns of complementarity to a finer resolution and its implications for conservation prioritization.

Authors:  Fábio Suzart de Albuquerque; Paul Beier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.912

2.  Predicted rarity-weighted richness, a new tool to prioritize sites for species representation.

Authors:  Fábio Albuquerque; Paul Beier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Improving the use of environmental diversity as a surrogate for species representation.

Authors:  Fabio Albuquerque; Paul Beier
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Shortcuts in biodiversity research: What determines the performance of higher taxa as surrogates for species?

Authors:  Neil Rosser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Soil carbon is a useful surrogate for conservation planning in developing nations.

Authors:  Pablo L Peri; Romina G Lasagno; Guillermo Martínez Pastur; Rachel Atkinson; Evert Thomas; Brenton Ladd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.