Francisco Amparo1, Debra A Schaumberg2, Reza Dana3. 1. Cornea Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Moran Center for Translational Medicine, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Cornea Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: reza_dana@meei.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) as assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), a 12-item symptom frequency-based questionnaire, and the Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE), a 2-item frequency- and severity-based visual analog scale. DESIGN: Clinic-based evaluation of a diagnostic test. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 114 patients with DED. METHODS: Patients were administered the OSDI and SANDE questionnaires at baseline and follow-up visits to evaluate DED-related symptoms. The correlations between both questionnaires' scores were evaluated using the Spearman coefficient, and their clinical differences were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and follow-up visit OSDI and SANDE dry eye symptom scores. RESULTS: At the baseline visit, the OSDI and SANDE questionnaire scores were significantly correlated (R = 0.64; P < 0.001). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between changes in the OSDI and SANDE scores from baseline to follow-up visits (R = 0.47; P < 0.001). A Bland-Altman analysis, after score normalization, revealed a difference (bias) of less than 2 centesimal units between the scores of the 2 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected from the SANDE questionnaire showed a significant correlation and negligible score differences with those from the OSDI, suggesting that the SANDE visual analog scale-based questionnaire has the potential to provide clinicians with a short, quick, and reliable measure for DED symptoms.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) as assessed by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), a 12-item symptom frequency-based questionnaire, and the Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE), a 2-item frequency- and severity-based visual analog scale. DESIGN: Clinic-based evaluation of a diagnostic test. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 114 patients with DED. METHODS:Patients were administered the OSDI and SANDE questionnaires at baseline and follow-up visits to evaluate DED-related symptoms. The correlations between both questionnaires' scores were evaluated using the Spearman coefficient, and their clinical differences were assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline and follow-up visit OSDI and SANDE dry eye symptom scores. RESULTS: At the baseline visit, the OSDI and SANDE questionnaire scores were significantly correlated (R = 0.64; P < 0.001). Moreover, a significant correlation was found between changes in the OSDI and SANDE scores from baseline to follow-up visits (R = 0.47; P < 0.001). A Bland-Altman analysis, after score normalization, revealed a difference (bias) of less than 2 centesimal units between the scores of the 2 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected from the SANDE questionnaire showed a significant correlation and negligible score differences with those from the OSDI, suggesting that the SANDE visual analog scale-based questionnaire has the potential to provide clinicians with a short, quick, and reliable measure for DED symptoms.
Authors: Debra A Schaumberg; Abha Gulati; William D Mathers; Thomas Clinch; Michael A Lemp; J Daniel Nelson; Gary N Foulks; Reza Dana Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Abha Gulati; Rose Sullivan; Julie E Buring; David A Sullivan; Reza Dana; Debra A Schaumberg Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Benjamin D Sullivan; Leslie A Crews; Elisabeth M Messmer; Gary N Foulks; Kelly K Nichols; Philipp Baenninger; Gerd Geerling; Francisco Figueiredo; Michael A Lemp Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Kimberly L Miller; John G Walt; David R Mink; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Steven E Wilson; Henry D Perry; Penny A Asbell; Stephen C Pflugfelder Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-01
Authors: Sarah P Chen; Giacomina Massaro-Giordano; Maxwell Pistilli; Courtney A Schreiber; Vatinee Y Bunya Journal: Cornea Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Valerie Yu; Dhruva Bhattacharya; Andrew Webster; Aditi Bauskar; Charles Flowers; Martin Heur; Shravan K Chintala; Tatsuo Itakura; Mark R Wilson; Joseph T Barr; Shinwu Jeong; Mingwu Wang; M Elizabeth Fini Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Jeffrey P Lienert; Laura Tarko; Miki Uchino; William G Christen; Debra A Schaumberg Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 12.079