PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of dry eye syndrome (DES) on vision-associated quality of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We identified 450 participants in the Women's Health Study (WHS) and 240 participants in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS) and sent a supplementary questionnaire asking how much their everyday activities were limited by symptoms of dry eye and to what degree problems with their eyes limited them in reading, driving, working at the computer, their professional activity, and watching television. By design, one-third of study subjects had clinically diagnosed DES or severe symptoms and two-thirds did not. We used logistic regression to examine relationships of DES with reported problems with everyday activities in each cohort and pooled estimates using meta-analysis methods. RESULTS: Of the participants invited, 85% completed the supplementary questionnaire, including 135 WHS and 55 PHS participants with DES, and 250 WHS and 149 PHS participants without DES. Controlling for age, diabetes, hypertension, and other factors, those with DES were more likely to report problems with reading ([odds ratio] OR = 3.64, 95% [confidence interval] CI 2.45 to 5.40, P < .0001); carrying out professional work (OR = 3.49, 95% CI 1.72 to 7.09, P= 0.001); using a computer (OR = 3.37, 95% CI 2.11 to 5.38, P < .0001); watching television (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.74, P = .04); driving during the day (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.96, P < .0001); and driving at night (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.28, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: DES is associated with a measurable adverse impact on several common and important tasks of daily living, further implicating this condition as an important public health problem deserving increased attention and resources.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of dry eye syndrome (DES) on vision-associated quality of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We identified 450 participants in the Women's Health Study (WHS) and 240 participants in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS) and sent a supplementary questionnaire asking how much their everyday activities were limited by symptoms of dry eye and to what degree problems with their eyes limited them in reading, driving, working at the computer, their professional activity, and watching television. By design, one-third of study subjects had clinically diagnosed DES or severe symptoms and two-thirds did not. We used logistic regression to examine relationships of DES with reported problems with everyday activities in each cohort and pooled estimates using meta-analysis methods. RESULTS: Of the participants invited, 85% completed the supplementary questionnaire, including 135 WHS and 55 PHSparticipants with DES, and 250 WHS and 149 PHSparticipants without DES. Controlling for age, diabetes, hypertension, and other factors, those with DES were more likely to report problems with reading ([odds ratio] OR = 3.64, 95% [confidence interval] CI 2.45 to 5.40, P < .0001); carrying out professional work (OR = 3.49, 95% CI 1.72 to 7.09, P= 0.001); using a computer (OR = 3.37, 95% CI 2.11 to 5.38, P < .0001); watching television (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.74, P = .04); driving during the day (OR = 2.80, 95% CI 1.58 to 4.96, P < .0001); and driving at night (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.28, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: DES is associated with a measurable adverse impact on several common and important tasks of daily living, further implicating this condition as an important public health problem deserving increased attention and resources.
Authors: C H Hennekens; J E Buring; J E Manson; M Stampfer; B Rosner; N R Cook; C Belanger; F LaMotte; J M Gaziano; P M Ridker; W Willett; R Peto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-05-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Xiaofen Zheng; Cintia S De Paiva; Kavita Rao; De-Quan Li; William J Farley; Michael Stern; Stephen C Pflugfelder Journal: Cornea Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Ehsan Rahimy; John D Pitcher; Solherny B Pangelinan; Wei Chen; William J Farley; Jerry Y Niederkorn; Michael E Stern; De-Quan Li; Stephen C Pflugfelder; Cintia S De Paiva Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Min Joung Lee; Ah Young Ko; Jung Hwa Ko; Hyun Ju Lee; Mee Kum Kim; Won Ryang Wee; Sang In Khwarg; Joo Youn Oh Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Anat Galor; William Feuer; David J Lee; Hermes Florez; Vincent D Venincasa; Victor L Perez Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Cintia S De Paiva; Solherny B Pangelinan; Emmanuel Chang; K-C Yoon; William J Farley; De-Quan Li; Stephen C Pflugfelder Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-12