Literature DB >> 25863072

Use of mechanistic models to integrate and analyze multiple proteomic datasets.

Edward C Stites1, Meraj Aziz2, Matthew S Creamer3, Daniel D Von Hoff2, Richard G Posner4, William S Hlavacek5.   

Abstract

Proteins in cell signaling networks tend to interact promiscuously through low-affinity interactions. Consequently, evaluating the physiological importance of mapped interactions can be difficult. Attempts to do so have tended to focus on single, measurable physicochemical factors, such as affinity or abundance. For example, interaction importance has been assessed on the basis of the relative affinities of binding partners for a protein of interest, such as a receptor. However, multiple factors can be expected to simultaneously influence the recruitment of proteins to a receptor (and the potential of these proteins to contribute to receptor signaling), including affinity, abundance, and competition, which is a network property. Here, we demonstrate that measurements of protein copy numbers and binding affinities can be integrated within the framework of a mechanistic, computational model that accounts for mass action and competition. We use cell line-specific models to rank the relative importance of protein-protein interactions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling network for 11 different cell lines. Each model accounts for experimentally characterized interactions of six autophosphorylation sites in EGFR with proteins containing a Src homology 2 and/or phosphotyrosine-binding domain. We measure importance as the predicted maximal extent of recruitment of a protein to EGFR following ligand-stimulated activation of EGFR signaling. We find that interactions ranked highly by this metric include experimentally detected interactions. Proteins with high importance rank in multiple cell lines include proteins with recognized, well-characterized roles in EGFR signaling, such as GRB2 and SHC1, as well as a protein with a less well-defined role, YES1. Our results reveal potential cell line-specific differences in recruitment.
Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863072      PMCID: PMC4390817          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  67 in total

1.  BioNetGen: software for rule-based modeling of signal transduction based on the interactions of molecular domains.

Authors:  Michael L Blinov; James R Faeder; Byron Goldstein; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Signal transduction networks in cancer: quantitative parameters influence network topology.

Authors:  David J Klinke
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical systems with BioNetGen.

Authors:  James R Faeder; Michael L Blinov; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

4.  Therapeutically targeting ErbB3: a key node in ligand-induced activation of the ErbB receptor-PI3K axis.

Authors:  Birgit Schoeberl; Emily A Pace; Jonathan B Fitzgerald; Brian D Harms; Lihui Xu; Lin Nie; Bryan Linggi; Ashish Kalra; Violette Paragas; Raghida Bukhalid; Viara Grantcharova; Neeraj Kohli; Kip A West; Magdalena Leszczyniecka; Michael J Feldhaus; Arthur J Kudla; Ulrik B Nielsen
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 8.192

5.  A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays.

Authors:  Richard B Jones; Andrew Gordus; Jordan A Krall; Gavin MacBeath
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor internalization on regulation of the phospholipase C-gamma1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  J M Haugh; K Schooler; A Wells; H S Wiley; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-03-26       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Quantification of short term signaling by the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  B N Kholodenko; O V Demin; G Moehren; J B Hoek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Real-time measurements of kinetics of EGF binding to soluble EGF receptor monomers and dimers support the dimerization model for receptor activation.

Authors:  M Zhou; S Felder; M Rubinstein; D R Hurwitz; A Ullrich; I Lax; J Schlessinger
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1993-08-17       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Interactions between SH2 domains and tyrosine-phosphorylated platelet-derived growth factor beta-receptor sequences: analysis of kinetic parameters by a novel biosensor-based approach.

Authors:  G Panayotou; G Gish; P End; O Truong; I Gout; R Dhand; M J Fry; I Hiles; T Pawson; M D Waterfield
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Molecular machines or pleiomorphic ensembles: signaling complexes revisited.

Authors:  Bruce J Mayer; Michael L Blinov; Leslie M Loew
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2009-10-16
View more
  13 in total

1.  Conservation of protein abundance patterns reveals the regulatory architecture of the EGFR-MAPK pathway.

Authors:  Tujin Shi; Mario Niepel; Jason E McDermott; Yuqian Gao; Carrie D Nicora; William B Chrisler; Lye M Markillie; Vladislav A Petyuk; Richard D Smith; Karin D Rodland; Peter K Sorger; Wei-Jun Qian; H Steven Wiley
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 2.  New insights into RAS biology reinvigorate interest in mathematical modeling of RAS signaling.

Authors:  Keesha E Erickson; Oleksii S Rukhlenko; Richard G Posner; William S Hlavacek; Boris N Kholodenko
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Generalizing Gillespie's Direct Method to Enable Network-Free Simulations.

Authors:  Ryan Suderman; Eshan D Mitra; Yen Ting Lin; Keesha E Erickson; Song Feng; William S Hlavacek
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  An Optimized Single-Molecule Pull-Down Assay for Quantification of Protein Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bailey; Emanuel Salazar-Cavazos; Rachel M Grattan; Michael J Wester; David J Schodt; Julian A Rojo; Keith A Lidke; Diane S Lidke
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 1.424

5.  A scalable, open-source implementation of a large-scale mechanistic model for single cell proliferation and death signaling.

Authors:  Cemal Erdem; Arnab Mutsuddy; Ethan M Bensman; William B Dodd; Michael M Saint-Antoine; Mehdi Bouhaddou; Robert C Blake; Sean M Gross; Laura M Heiser; F Alex Feltus; Marc R Birtwistle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  New analysis pipeline for high-throughput domain-peptide affinity experiments improves SH2 interaction data.

Authors:  Tom Ronan; Roman Garnett; Kristen M Naegle
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Mathematics in modern immunology.

Authors:  Mario Castro; Grant Lythe; Carmen Molina-París; Ruy M Ribeiro
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  How low can you go?

Authors:  H Steven Wiley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Protein abundance of AKT and ERK pathway components governs cell type-specific regulation of proliferation.

Authors:  Lorenz Adlung; Sandip Kar; Marie-Christine Wagner; Bin She; Sajib Chakraborty; Jie Bao; Susen Lattermann; Melanie Boerries; Hauke Busch; Patrick Wuchter; Anthony D Ho; Jens Timmer; Marcel Schilling; Thomas Höfer; Ursula Klingmüller
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  A mechanistic pan-cancer pathway model informed by multi-omics data interprets stochastic cell fate responses to drugs and mitogens.

Authors:  Mehdi Bouhaddou; Anne Marie Barrette; Alan D Stern; Rick J Koch; Matthew S DiStefano; Eric A Riesel; Luis C Santos; Annie L Tan; Alex E Mertz; Marc R Birtwistle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.