Marco Degidi1, Giuseppe Daprile1, Adriano Piattelli2. 1. Private Practice, Bologna, Italy. 2. Full Professor, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy. Electronic address: apiattelli@unich.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this present study was to investigate the relation between implant site underpreparation and primary stability in the presence of poor-quality bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study was performed on fresh humid bovine bone; samples presented no cortical layer with a cancellous structure inside and were obtained from the hip. The bones were firmly attached to a base device. Sixty sites were prepared according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer: a 2-mm pilot drill was introduced to the proper depth and then twist drills of 3 and 3.4 mm were used. After site preparation, 20 3.4- × 11-mm (standard protocol group), 20 3.8- × 11-mm (10% undersized group), and 20 4.5- × 11-mm (25% undersized group) implants were inserted at a calibrated maximum torque of 70 N-cm at the predetermined speed of 30 rpm. After implant insertion, variable torque work (VTW), maximum insertion torque (peak IT), and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values were recorded. RESULTS: The standard protocol group showed a mean VTW of 565.77 ± 219.12 N-cm, a peak IT of 11.3 ± 4.44 N-cm, and an RFA of 69.35 ± 7.35 implant stability quotient (ISQ). The 10% undersized group showed a mean VTW of 1,240.24 ± 407.78 N-cm, a peak IT of 20.26 ± 7.03 N-cm, and an RFA of 73.40 ± 2.33 ISQ. The 25% undersized group showed a mean VTW of 1,254.96 ± 727.49 N-cm, a peak IT of 17.15 ± 10.39 N-cm, and an RFA of 72.30 ± 6.70 ISQ. For VTW, the difference between the standard and undersized protocol values was statistically significant; for peak IT, the difference between the standard and 10% undersized protocol values was statistically significant; no other statistical differences were found between mean values. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of poor-bone quality, a 10% undersized protocol is sufficient to improve the primary stability of the implant; additional decreases do not seem to enhance primary stability values.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this present study was to investigate the relation between implant site underpreparation and primary stability in the presence of poor-quality bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study was performed on fresh humid bovine bone; samples presented no cortical layer with a cancellous structure inside and were obtained from the hip. The bones were firmly attached to a base device. Sixty sites were prepared according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer: a 2-mm pilot drill was introduced to the proper depth and then twist drills of 3 and 3.4 mm were used. After site preparation, 20 3.4- × 11-mm (standard protocol group), 20 3.8- × 11-mm (10% undersized group), and 20 4.5- × 11-mm (25% undersized group) implants were inserted at a calibrated maximum torque of 70 N-cm at the predetermined speed of 30 rpm. After implant insertion, variable torque work (VTW), maximum insertion torque (peak IT), and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) values were recorded. RESULTS: The standard protocol group showed a mean VTW of 565.77 ± 219.12 N-cm, a peak IT of 11.3 ± 4.44 N-cm, and an RFA of 69.35 ± 7.35 implant stability quotient (ISQ). The 10% undersized group showed a mean VTW of 1,240.24 ± 407.78 N-cm, a peak IT of 20.26 ± 7.03 N-cm, and an RFA of 73.40 ± 2.33 ISQ. The 25% undersized group showed a mean VTW of 1,254.96 ± 727.49 N-cm, a peak IT of 17.15 ± 10.39 N-cm, and an RFA of 72.30 ± 6.70 ISQ. For VTW, the difference between the standard and undersized protocol values was statistically significant; for peak IT, the difference between the standard and 10% undersized protocol values was statistically significant; no other statistical differences were found between mean values. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of poor-bone quality, a 10% undersized protocol is sufficient to improve the primary stability of the implant; additional decreases do not seem to enhance primary stability values.