Literature DB >> 25861103

Pharmacy students' preference for using mobile devices in a clinical setting for practice-related tasks.

Craig A H Richard1, Justine F Hastings1, Jennifer E Bryant1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine pharmacy students' ownership of, use of, and preference for using a mobile device in a practice setting.
METHODS: Eighty-one pharmacy students were recruited and completed a pretest that collected information about their demographics and mobile devices and also had them rank the iPhone, iPad mini, and iPad for preferred use in a pharmacy practice setting. Students used the 3 devices to perform pharmacy practice-related tasks and then completed a posttest to again rank the devices for preferred use in a pharmacy practice setting.
RESULTS: The iPhone was the most commonly owned mobile device (59.3% of students), and the iPad mini was the least commonly owned (18.5%). About 70% of the students used their mobile devices at least once a week in a pharmacy practice setting. The iPhone was the most commonly used device in a practice setting (46.9% of students), and the iPod Touch was the least commonly used device (1.2%). The iPad mini was the most preferred device for use in a pharmacy practice setting prior to performing pharmacy practice-related tasks (49.4% of students), and was preferred by significantly more students after performing the tasks (70.4%).
CONCLUSION: Pharmacy students commonly use their mobile devices in pharmacy practice settings and most selected the iPad mini as the preferred device for use in a practice setting even though it was the device owned by the fewest students.

Keywords:  iPad; iPad mini; iPhone; mobile device; pharmacy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25861103      PMCID: PMC4386743          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe79222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  Survey of pharmacy preceptors' use of hand-held electronic devices.

Authors:  Maria D Kostka-Rokosz; William W McCloskey
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb

2.  Mobile computing initiatives within pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Eleanora R Bird; Mikael Jones
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  Medical applications for pharmacists using mobile devices.

Authors:  Timothy Dy Aungst
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.154

4.  Opportunities for pharmacists in mobile health.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Shara Elrod; Brent I Fox; Zaher Hajar; Joan H Dzenowagis
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.637

5.  Integrating mHealth and mobile technology education into the pharmacy curriculum.

Authors:  Timothy Dy Aungst
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Perceptions and use of iPad technology by pharmacy practice faculty members.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; David P Zgarrick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Assessing the impact of mobile technology on order verification during pharmacist participation in patient rounds.

Authors:  Shaunta' M Ray; Shirmil Clark; Julie W Jeter; Sarah A Treadway
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 8.  Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Sharon Mickan; Julie K Tilson; Helen Atherton; Nia Wyn Roberts; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of adverse drug reaction formatting in drug information mobile phone applications.

Authors:  Sean M McConachie; Dena Berri; Jewel Konja; Christopher A Giuliano
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  A balancing act: a phenomenological exploration of medical students' experiences of using mobile devices in the clinical setting.

Authors:  F Rashid-Doubell; S Mohamed; K Elmusharaf; C S O'Neill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.