BACKGROUND: We examined outcomes in patients treated for radioactive iodine-induced sialadenitis (RAIS) and xerostomia with sialendoscopy. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected for all patients undergoing sialendoscopy for RAIS from a single institution. Interventional details and intraoperative findings were recorded. Qualitative data were obtained through patient examination, telephone interviews, and use of a standard quality of life questionnaire, Xerostomia Questionnaire. Quantitative data were obtained from patients who underwent sialometry. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (24 women and 2 men; median age, 43 years; age range, 19-57 years) underwent interventional sialendoscopy after conservative management of symptoms proved unsuccessful. Sialadenitis was present in 25 patients and xerostomia in 22 patients. Mucus plugging in the duct of the gland was the most common finding (22 patients) followed by stenosis (18 patients), inflammation (eight patients), and erythema (eight patients). Median follow-up time was 23.4±12.1 months. Sixteen patients (64%) reported complete resolution; seven (28%), partial resolution; one (4%), no change in symptoms; and one (4%), regression in RAIS-related symptoms. Patients subjectively noted the following regarding their xerostomia symptoms: seven (31.8%) had complete resolution; 10 (45.5%), partial resolution; four (18.2%), no change; and one (4.5%), regression. Statistical analysis of the available sialometry data revealed a statistically significant difference in saliva production at 6 months following sialendoscopy for unstimulated saliva production (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Sialendoscopy is an effective treatment option for the management of RAIS and xerostomia refractory to conservative therapy and medical management. Patients in our cohort report durable improvement in symptoms after intervention.
BACKGROUND: We examined outcomes in patients treated for radioactive iodine-induced sialadenitis (RAIS) and xerostomia with sialendoscopy. METHODS: Data was prospectively collected for all patients undergoing sialendoscopy for RAIS from a single institution. Interventional details and intraoperative findings were recorded. Qualitative data were obtained through patient examination, telephone interviews, and use of a standard quality of life questionnaire, Xerostomia Questionnaire. Quantitative data were obtained from patients who underwent sialometry. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (24 women and 2 men; median age, 43 years; age range, 19-57 years) underwent interventional sialendoscopy after conservative management of symptoms proved unsuccessful. Sialadenitis was present in 25 patients and xerostomia in 22 patients. Mucus plugging in the duct of the gland was the most common finding (22 patients) followed by stenosis (18 patients), inflammation (eight patients), and erythema (eight patients). Median follow-up time was 23.4±12.1 months. Sixteen patients (64%) reported complete resolution; seven (28%), partial resolution; one (4%), no change in symptoms; and one (4%), regression in RAIS-related symptoms. Patients subjectively noted the following regarding their xerostomia symptoms: seven (31.8%) had complete resolution; 10 (45.5%), partial resolution; four (18.2%), no change; and one (4.5%), regression. Statistical analysis of the available sialometry data revealed a statistically significant difference in saliva production at 6 months following sialendoscopy for unstimulated saliva production (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Sialendoscopy is an effective treatment option for the management of RAIS and xerostomia refractory to conservative therapy and medical management. Patients in our cohort report durable improvement in symptoms after intervention.
Authors: Matthew A Bowen; Marcie Tauzin; Evelyn A Kluka; Daniel W Nuss; Michael DiLeo; Andrew J McWhorter; Barry Schaitkin; Rohan R Walvekar Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Krista M D La Perle; Dong Chul Kim; Nathan C Hall; Adam Bobbey; Daniel H Shen; Rebecca S Nagy; Paul E Wakely; Amy Lehman; David Jarjoura; Sissy M Jhiang Journal: Thyroid Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: N A Samaan; P N Schultz; R C Hickey; H Goepfert; T P Haynie; D A Johnston; N G Ordonez Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Hendrik Rathke; Clemens Kratochwil; Ralph Hohenberger; Frederik Lars Giesel; Frank Bruchertseifer; Paul Flechsig; Alfred Morgenstern; Matti Hein; Peter Plinkert; Uwe Haberkorn; Olcay Cem Bulut Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: P Canzi; S Cacciola; P Capaccio; F Pagella; A Occhini; L Pignataro; M Benazzo Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.124