Literature DB >> 25860179

Challenges in the interpretation of protein h/d exchange data: a molecular dynamics simulation perspective.

Robert G McAllister1, Lars Konermann1.   

Abstract

Many protein structural investigations involve the use of H/D exchange (HDX) techniques. It is commonly thought that amide backbone protection arises from intramolecular H-bonding and/or burial of NH sites. Recently, fundamental HDX-related tenets have been called into question. The current work focuses on ubiquitin for exploring the defining features that distinguish amides in "open" (exchange-competent) and "closed" (exchange-incompetent) environments. Instead of relying on static X-ray structures, we employ all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for obtaining a dynamic view of the protein ground state and its surrounding solvent. The HDX properties for 57 out of 72 NH sites can be readily explained on the basis of backbone and side chain H-bonding, as well as solvent accessibility considerations. Unexpectedly, the same criteria fail for predicting the HDX characteristics of the remaining 15 amides. Significant protection is seen for numerous exposed NH sites that are not engaged in intramolecular H-bonds, whereas other amides that seemingly share the same features are unprotected. We scrutinize the proposal that H-bonding to crystallographically defined water can cause the protection of surface amides. For ubiquitin, the positioning of crystal water is not compatible with this idea. To further explore possible solvation effects, we tested for the presence of partially immobilized water networks. Our MD data reveal no difference in the solvation properties of protected vs unprotected surface amides, making it unlikely that restricted water dynamics can cause anomalous amide protection. The findings reported here suggest that efforts to deduce protein structural features on the basis of HDX protection factors may yield misleading results. This conclusion is relevant for initiatives that rely on sparse structural data as constraints for elucidating protein conformations. It may be necessary to pursue detailed quantum mechanical studies of the protein, the solvent, and the hydroxide catalyst for obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the factors that govern HDX rates. The considerable size of the systems involved makes such endeavors a daunting task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25860179     DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  25 in total

1.  Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry of Anions: Part 3. Estimating Surface Area Exposure by Deuterium Uptake.

Authors:  Mahdiar Khakinejad; Samaneh Ghassabi Kondalaji; Gregory C Donohoe; Stephen J Valentine
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Real-time HD Exchange Kinetics of Proteins from Buffered Aqueous Solution with Electrothermal Supercharging and Top-Down Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Catherine C Going; Zijie Xia; Evan R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Dynamics of Hepatitis B Virus Capsid Protein Dimer Regulate Assembly through an Allosteric Network.

Authors:  Angela Patterson; Zhongchao Zhao; Elizabeth Waymire; Adam Zlotnick; Brian Bothner
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  Comprehensive Peptide Ion Structure Studies Using Ion Mobility Techniques: Part 1. An Advanced Protocol for Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Collision Cross-Section Calculation.

Authors:  Samaneh Ghassabi Kondalaji; Mahdiar Khakinejad; Amirmahdi Tafreshian; Stephen J Valentine
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  NMR assignments of sparsely labeled proteins using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Qi Gao; Gordon R Chalmers; Kelley W Moremen; James H Prestegard
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.835

6.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Measurements of the Fab Fragment of NISTmAb.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Hudgens; Elyssia S Gallagher; Ioannis Karageorgos; Kyle W Anderson; James J Filliben; Richard Y-C Huang; Guodong Chen; George M Bou-Assaf; Alfonso Espada; Michael J Chalmers; Eduardo Harguindey; Hui-Min Zhang; Benjamin T Walters; Jennifer Zhang; John Venable; Caitlin Steckler; Inhee Park; Ansgar Brock; Xiaojun Lu; Ratnesh Pandey; Arun Chandramohan; Ganesh Srinivasan Anand; Sasidhar N Nirudodhi; Justin B Sperry; Jason C Rouse; James A Carroll; Kasper D Rand; Ulrike Leurs; David D Weis; Mohammed A Al-Naqshabandi; Tyler S Hageman; Daniel Deredge; Patrick L Wintrode; Malvina Papanastasiou; John D Lambris; Sheng Li; Sarah Urata
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange within Adenosine Deaminase, a TIM Barrel Hydrolase, Identifies Networks for Thermal Activation of Catalysis.

Authors:  Shuaihua Gao; Emily J Thompson; Samuel L Barrow; Wenju Zhang; Anthony T Iavarone; Judith P Klinman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Conformational characterization of nerve growth factor-β reveals that its regulatory pro-part domain stabilizes three loop regions in its mature part.

Authors:  Esben Trabjerg; Fredrik Kartberg; Søren Christensen; Kasper D Rand
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Intracellular pH modulates quinary structure.

Authors:  Rachel D Cohen; Alex J Guseman; Gary J Pielak
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  New Insights into Active Site Conformation Dynamics of E. coli PNP Revealed by Combined H/D Exchange Approach and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Saša Kazazić; Branimir Bertoša; Marija Luić; Goran Mikleušević; Krzysztof Tarnowski; Michal Dadlez; Marta Narczyk; Agnieszka Bzowska
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.109

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.