OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of two different sonographic median nerve measurement calculations in predicting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) severity in a study population with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS. METHODS: 643 wrists of 427 patients (325 females and 102 males, age range: 17-90 years, mean ± SD: 57.9 ± 14.7) were included with CTS diagnosis based on clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the median nerve was performed at the carpal tunnel level (CSAc) and at the pronator quadratus muscle level (CSAp). Two parameters were calculated: delta (∆-CSA), which is the difference between proximal and distal measurements, and ratio (R-CSA), calculated by dividing distal over proximal measurements. RESULTS: Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe CTS based upon NCS. The mean ∆-CSA (4.2 ± 2.6, 6.95 ± 2.2 and 10.7 ± 4.9 mm(2)) and mean R-CSA (1.5 ± 0.4, 1.95 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.7) values were significantly different between all groups (p < 0.001). Optimal cut-off values for ∆-CSA and R-CSA were 6 mm(2) and 1.7, respectively, to distinguish mild from moderate disease, and 9 mm(2) and 2.2, respectively, to distinguish moderate from severe disease. CONCLUSION: Threshold values for the calculated sonographic parameters ∆-CSA and R-CSA are useful in predicting CTS severity compared to NCS. KEY POINTS: • Two proposed parameters were calculated (∆-CSA, R-CSA) and compared to NCS. • A defined sonoanatomical proximal landmark was used for the calculation. • Both parameters showed ability to detect CTS severity comparable to NCS. • Cut-off values could be determined for both parameters.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of two different sonographic median nerve measurement calculations in predicting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) severity in a study population with clinically and electrophysiologically confirmed CTS. METHODS: 643 wrists of 427 patients (325 females and 102 males, age range: 17-90 years, mean ± SD: 57.9 ± 14.7) were included with CTS diagnosis based on clinical and nerve conduction studies (NCS). Cross-sectional area (CSA) measurement of the median nerve was performed at the carpal tunnel level (CSAc) and at the pronator quadratus muscle level (CSAp). Two parameters were calculated: delta (∆-CSA), which is the difference between proximal and distal measurements, and ratio (R-CSA), calculated by dividing distal over proximal measurements. RESULTS:Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe CTS based upon NCS. The mean ∆-CSA (4.2 ± 2.6, 6.95 ± 2.2 and 10.7 ± 4.9 mm(2)) and mean R-CSA (1.5 ± 0.4, 1.95 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.7) values were significantly different between all groups (p < 0.001). Optimal cut-off values for ∆-CSA and R-CSA were 6 mm(2) and 1.7, respectively, to distinguish mild from moderate disease, and 9 mm(2) and 2.2, respectively, to distinguish moderate from severe disease. CONCLUSION: Threshold values for the calculated sonographic parameters ∆-CSA and R-CSA are useful in predicting CTS severity compared to NCS. KEY POINTS: • Two proposed parameters were calculated (∆-CSA, R-CSA) and compared to NCS. • A defined sonoanatomical proximal landmark was used for the calculation. • Both parameters showed ability to detect CTS severity comparable to NCS. • Cut-off values could be determined for both parameters.
Authors: Ethan R Wiesler; George D Chloros; Michael S Cartwright; Beth P Smith; Julia Rushing; Francis O Walker Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.230
Authors: Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: A S Klauser; M Abd Ellah; C Kremser; M Taljanovic; G Schmidle; M Gabl; F Cartes-Zumelzu; R Steiger; E R Gizewski Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Reza Salman Roghani; Mohammad Taghi Holisaz; Ali Asghar Sahami Norouzi; Ahmad Delbari; Faeze Gohari; Johan Lokk; Andrea J Boon Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 3.133