Literature DB >> 23727345

Comparison of proximal and distal cross-sectional areas of the median nerve, carpal tunnel, and nerve/tunnel index in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Hyoung Seop Kim1, Seung Ho Joo, Hyong Keun Cho, Yong Wook Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a quantitative analysis of ultrasonographic measurements and possible pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome by comparing cross-sectional areas of the median nerve, carpal tunnel, and nerve/tunnel index and the difference in ultrasonographic findings between affected and nonaffected hands and between sexes.
DESIGN: Blinded comparison study.
SETTING: Secondary referral and training hospital of institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=51; 42 women, 9 men) with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome who underwent sonography within 1 week after the electrodiagnostic study.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Electrodiagnostic and ultrasonographic studies were conducted on both upper extremities. Cross-sectional areas of the median nerve and carpal tunnel were measured at 2 separate levels; proximal and distal cross-sectional areas of the carpal tunnel were each measured at the scaphoid-pisiform and trapezium-hamate levels, respectively.
RESULTS: Comparison between normative (n=24) and abnormal hands (n=78) revealed the following: the mean proximal cross-sectional areas of the median nerve, carpal tunnel, and nerve/tunnel index of electrodiagnostically normative hands were 10.941mm(2), 192.43mm(2), and 5.635%, respectively, whereas those of abnormal hands were 13.74mm(2), 208.87mm(2), and 6.693%, respectively, showing statistically significant differences for all (P<.05). Distal measurements of the cross-sectional area of the median nerve, carpal tunnel, and nerve/tunnel index were 10.088mm(2), 150.4mm(2), and 6.762%, respectively, in normative hands, and 11.178mm(2), 149.6mm(2), and 7.493%, respectively, in abnormal hands, showing no statistically significant differences (P>.05). In women, proximal cross-sectional areas of the median nerve and nerve/tunnel index of abnormal hands showed statistically significant differences, but no ultrasonographic measurement with a statistically significant difference was observed in men.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonaffected hands, the proximal cross-sectional areas of the median nerve and carpal tunnel were greater, but the distal ultrasonographic measurements were not in affected hands. Ultrasonographic findings of carpal tunnel syndrome were different according to sex.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; CSA; CTS; Carpal tunnel syndrome; EMG; Median nerve; Rehabilitation; US; Ultrasonography; body mass index; carpal tunnel syndrome; cross-sectional area; electromyography; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23727345     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  11 in total

1.  Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome assessed using high-frequency ultrasonography: cross-section areas of 8-site median nerve.

Authors:  Guangxiang Yu; Qinglong Chen; Dan Wang; Xijia Wang; Zhixuan Li; Junjie Zhao; Chunli Song; Hui Wang; Zhe Wang
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Sonographic cross-sectional area measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome patients: can delta and ratio calculations predict severity compared to nerve conduction studies?

Authors:  Andrea S Klauser; Mohamed M H Abd Ellah; Ethan J Halpern; Christian Siedentopf; Thomas Auer; Gernot Eberle; Rosa Bellmann-Weiler; Christian Kremser; Martin Sojer; Wolfgang N Löscher; Markus F Gabl; Gudrun M Feuchtner; Werner R Jaschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Reliability Assessment of Various Sonographic Techniques for Evaluating Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Anthony D Junck; Eva M Escobedo; Bethany M Lipa; Michael Cronan; Colleen Anthonisen; Eduard Poltavskiy; Heejung Bang; Jay J Han
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Ultrasonography for nerve compression syndromes of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Soo-Jung Choi; Jae Hong Ahn; Dae Shik Ryu; Chae Hoon Kang; Seung Mun Jung; Man Soo Park; Dong-Rock Shin
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with ultrasonography: value of inlet-to-outlet median nerve area ratio in patients versus healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Tengfei Fu; Manlin Cao; Fang Liu; Jiaan Zhu; Dongmei Ye; Xianxuan Feng; Yiming Xu; Gang Wang; Yuehong Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evolutionary medicine Carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Althea Anne D Perez; Scott W Simpson
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection Combined with Miniscalpel-Needle Release in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vs. Steroid Injection Alone: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Subo Zhang; Fei Wang; Songjian Ke; Caina Lin; Cuicui Liu; Wenjun Xin; Shaoling Wu; Chao Ma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The usefulness of ultrasonography to diagnose the early stage of carpal tunnel syndrome in proximal to the carpal tunnel inlet: A prospective study.

Authors:  Myeonghwan Bang; Jong Moon Kim; Hyoung Seop Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Application of digital infrared thermography for carpal tunnel syndrome evaluation.

Authors:  Dougho Park; Byung Hee Kim; Sang-Eok Lee; Dong Young Kim; Yoon Sik Eom; Jae Man Cho; Joong Won Yang; Mansu Kim; Heum Dai Kwon; Jang Woo Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Correlation Between Electrodiagnostic Results and Ultrasonographic Findings in the Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Females.

Authors:  Da Sol Ha; Hyoung Seop Kim; Jong Moon Kim; Kun Hee Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.