| Literature DB >> 25859870 |
Ednei Luiz Antonio1, Andrey Jorge Serra2, Alexandra Alberta dos Santos1, Stella Sousa Vieira1, Jairo Montemor Augusto Silva1, Amanda Yoshizaki3, Renato Rodrigues Sofia4, Paulo José Ferreira Tucci1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: An unclear issue is whether gender may influence at cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). We evaluated left ventricle remodeling in female and male rats post-MI.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25859870 PMCID: PMC4389530 DOI: 10.5935/1678-741.20140093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc
Fig. 1Illustrative example of two-dimensional mode traces of the left ventricle (LV) of the female and male rats. Images for mitral inflow velocity profile determined by pulsed wave Doppler are also shown. Sham rats are placed on the left, and infarcted rats are placed on the right
Echocardiographic morphology parameters for female and male rats post-MI
| Female | Male | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Week 1 | Week 6 | Week 6 | Week 1 | Week 1 | Week 6 | Week 6 | |
| Sham | MI | Sham | MI | Sham | MI | Sham | MI | |
| MI size(%) | ---- | 44±5 | ---- | 42±9 | ---- | 42±3 | ---- | 42±7 |
| SLA (mm) | 4±0.5 | 4.9±11 | 4±0.2 | 6±1 | 3±0.5 | 5±1 | 3±0.4 | 6±1 |
| SLA/BW(mm/g) | 0.02± 0.001 | 0.02±0.0005 | 0.02±0.002 | 0.03±0.003 | 0.01±0.002 | 0.02±0.0005 | 0.01±0.0003 | 0.02±0.002 |
| LVDD(mm) | 5±0.5 | 8±0.5 | 5±1 | 9±1 | 4±1 | 9±1 | 5±1 | 10±0.01 |
| LVDD/BW(mm/g) 0.03± 0.002 | 0.04±0.003 | 0.03±0.001 | 0.04±0.01 | 0.03±0.001 | 0.04±0.005 | 0.03±0.002 | 0.03±0.005 | |
| LVSD(mm) | 2±0.3 | 6±1 | 3±1 | 7±1 | 2±1 | 7±0.3 | 3±1 | 8±0.3 |
| LVSD/BW(mm/g) 0.02± 0.002 | 0.03±0.0004 | 0.02±0.0001 | 0.03±0.01 | 0.02±0.0001 | 0.03±0.005 | 0.02±0.0002 | 0.03±0.005 | |
MI=myocardial infarction; BW=body weight; SLA=left atrium size; LVDD=left ventricle diastolic diameter; LVSD=left ventricle systolic diameter Data are shown as means±SD. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were applied for comparisons.
P<0.05 vs. Sham on first and sixth week.
P<0.05 vs. MI on first week
Echocardiographic functional parameters for female and male rats post-MI
| Female | Male | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 | Week 1 | Week 6 | Week 6 | Week 1 | Week 1 | Week 6 | Week 6 | |
| Sham | MI | Sham | MI | Sham | MI | Sham | MI | |
| FAC (%) | 63±4 | 34±6 | 67±3 | 29±7 | 66±7 | 32±4 | 63±4 | 31±7 |
| E (cm/s) | 69±2 | 70±2 | 73±6 | 85±2 | 59±2 | 73±1 | 67±4 | 87±2 |
| A (cm/s) | 24±1 | 20±1 | 29±5 | 20±1 | 30±5 | 28±1 | 30±6 | 28±2 |
| E/A ratio | 3±1 | 5±3 | 3±1 | 6±4 | 1±0.5 | 3±2 | 2±0.2 | 5±3 |
FAC=fractional area change; E=E wave; A=A wave; Data are shown as means±SD. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were applied for comparisons.
P<0.05 vs. Sham on first and sixth week
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | |
|---|---|
| FE | Female |
| LV | Left ventricle |
| MA | Male |
| MI | Myocardial infarction |
| Authors’ roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| ELA | Data collection and analysis, experimental design and manuscript writing |
| AJS | Experimental design, statistical analysis and manuscript writing |
| AAS | Collection and analysis of data |
| SSV | Collection and analysis of data |
| JMAS | Collection and analysis of data |
| AY | Collection and analysis of data |
| RRS | Study design and manuscript writing |
| PJFT | Experimental design, getting funding for research, critical review of the manuscript |