Shaheen Aboobaker1, Baiju Gopalan Nair2, Rajesh Gopal3, Sandeep Jituri1, Fazalu Rahman Pothu Veetil4. 1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Malabar Dental College and Research Centre , Edappal, Kerala, India . 2. Professor and Head of The Department, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Malabar Dental College and Research Centre , Edappal, Kerala, India . 3. Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Sciences , Neyyatinkara, Kerala, India . 4. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Malabar Dental College And Research Centre , Edappal, Kerala, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of roots obturated with guttapercha using bonded amalgam, GC Light cure GIC (resin modified glass ionomer cement) and Tetric N Flow (flowable hybrid composite) as different intra orifice barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty freshly extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were reduced to 14 mm from the coronal aspect. All canals were enlarged to size 30 and specimens were obturated with gutta percha cones, except for control group specimens the coronal 3 mm of root fillings of all other group specimens were removed with the aid of heated plugger. All samples were randomly divided into 4 groups of 20 specimens each. They were control, Fuji GC LC GIC, Tetric N Flow and Bonded Amalgam. After the placement of the intra orifice barrier materials, specimens stored at 37(o)C and 100% humidity for one week to allow the materials to set completely. After one week, all the groups were subjected to fracture resistance testing by using Universal testing machine. RESULTS: Data was analysed for significance by ANOVA (Analysis of variance) and further pair wise comparison was performed by Benferroni test. Level of significance was taken as 0.05. Tetric N Flow group showed better fracture resistance as compared to all other groups and Control group is least among the groups. Fracture resistance of Tetric N Flow compared with bonded amalgam was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Tetric N Flow and Fuji GC LC GIC can be used as intra-orifice barriers with good fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of roots obturated with guttapercha using bonded amalgam, GC Light cure GIC (resin modified glass ionomer cement) and Tetric N Flow (flowable hybrid composite) as different intra orifice barriers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty freshly extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were reduced to 14 mm from the coronal aspect. All canals were enlarged to size 30 and specimens were obturated with gutta percha cones, except for control group specimens the coronal 3 mm of root fillings of all other group specimens were removed with the aid of heated plugger. All samples were randomly divided into 4 groups of 20 specimens each. They were control, Fuji GC LC GIC, Tetric N Flow and Bonded Amalgam. After the placement of the intra orifice barrier materials, specimens stored at 37(o)C and 100% humidity for one week to allow the materials to set completely. After one week, all the groups were subjected to fracture resistance testing by using Universal testing machine. RESULTS: Data was analysed for significance by ANOVA (Analysis of variance) and further pair wise comparison was performed by Benferroni test. Level of significance was taken as 0.05. Tetric N Flow group showed better fracture resistance as compared to all other groups and Control group is least among the groups. Fracture resistance of Tetric N Flow compared with bonded amalgam was statistically significant. CONCLUSION:Tetric N Flow and Fuji GC LC GIC can be used as intra-orifice barriers with good fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth.