Literature DB >> 16728249

A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha.

Chad Williams1, Robert J Loushine, R Norman Weller, David H Pashley, Franklin R Tay.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha under dry conditions and after 1 month of water storage to determine if they are stiff enough to reinforce roots. Dog-bone shaped specimens were created and pulled to failure at 3 mm/min in a Vitrodyne universal tester. The apparent modulus of elasticity, percent elongation, and yield stress were measured. Cohesive strength was defined as the yield stress. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for each outcome (alpha = 0.05). The results of this study show that the cohesive strength (that is the tensile stress when they begin to flow or break) and modulus of elasticity (or stiffness) of gutta-percha and Resilon are relatively low. Although the results showed statistically significant differences between the physical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon under varied conditions, these differences were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha is too low to reinforce roots after root canal therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16728249     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  18 in total

Review 1.  Monoblocks in root canals: a hypothetical or a tangible goal.

Authors:  Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of three newer root canal obturating materials guttaflow, resilon and thermafil: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Shilpa H Bhandi; Subhash T S
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-02-26

3.  Effect of double antibiotic and calcium hydroxide pastes on dislodgement resistance of an epoxy resin-based and two calcium silicate-based root canal sealers.

Authors:  Hakan Gokturk; Emre Bayram; Huda Melike Bayram; Tugrul Aslan; Yakup Ustun
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effect of intra-orifice barriers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth - an ex-vivo study.

Authors:  Shaheen Aboobaker; Baiju Gopalan Nair; Rajesh Gopal; Sandeep Jituri; Fazalu Rahman Pothu Veetil
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-02-01

5.  Influence of conservative endodontic access and the osteoporotic bone on the restoration material adhesive behavior through finite element analysis.

Authors:  Aline Batista Gonçalves Franco; Amanda Gonçalves Franco; Geraldo Alberto Pinheiro de Carvalho; Elimario Venturin Ramos; José Cláudio Faria Amorim; Alexandre Sigrist de Martim
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Influence of different restorative techniques on the strength of endodontically treated weakened roots.

Authors:  Khalid H Alsamadani; El-Sayed Mohammed Abdaziz; El-Sayed Gad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-05-14

7.  Fracture resistance of roots obturated with novel hydrophilic obturation systems.

Authors:  Vibha Hegde; Shashank Arora
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 May-Jun

8.  Fracture Resistance of Simulated Immature Teeth Obturated with Gutta-Percha or Resilon and Reinforced by Composite or Post.

Authors:  Behnam Bolhari; Elham Mojazi Amiri; Hamidreza Kermanshah; Sholeh Ghabraei; Azad Jamei
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-02

9.  Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of Gutta-percha cones with a herbal disinfectant.

Authors:  Raghunandhan Raju Mahali; Binoy Dola; Rambabu Tanikonda; Suresh Peddireddi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

10.  Comparison of resilon and gutta-percha filling materials on root canal fracture resistance following restoring with quartz fiber posts.

Authors:  P Mehrvarzfar; Y Rezvani; E Jalalian
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.