Literature DB >> 25858867

Overview of biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease.

Ignazio Brusca1.   

Abstract

Among the adverse reactions caused by wheat, celiac disease (CD) is the longest studied and best-known pathology. The more recently defined non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) presents with symptoms which are often indistinguishable from CD. Diagnosis of CD is based on serologic, molecular, and bioptic testing. The IgA anti-transglutaminase (tTG) test is considered highly important, as it shows high sensitivity and specificity and its levels correlate to the degree of intestinal damage. Small bowel biopsy can be avoided in symptomatic patients with IgA anti-tTG levels above 10× the manufacturer's cut-off. Recently, tests of anti-deamidated peptides of gliadin (DGP) have replaced classic anti-native gliadin (AGA) tests. DGP assays have a considerably higher diagnostic accuracy than AGA assays, especially in the IgG class, and can replace anti-tTG tests in patients with selective IgA deficiency. The combination of IgG anti-DGP plus IgA anti-tTG assays show greater sensitivity than a single test, with very high specificity. EMA tests have great diagnostic accuracy but are not recommended by all the latest guidelines because they are observer dependent. Biopsy must still be considered the gold standard for CD diagnosis. HLA-DQ genotyping can be used to screen asymptomatic children and in cases of histology/serology disagreement. About half of NCGS patients are DQ2 positive and have IgG AGA. To diagnose NCGS, first CD and wheat allergy must be excluded; then the wheat dependence of symptoms must be verified by a gluten-free diet and subsequent gluten challenge.
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actin; Anti-endomysium; Antibodies; Celiac disease; Deamidated gliadin; Diagnostic accuracy; Gluten sensitivity; Gluten-related disorders; Point of care tests; Tissue transglutaminase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25858867     DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2014.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Clin Chem        ISSN: 0065-2423            Impact factor:   5.394


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intraepithelial lymphocytes, scores, mimickers and challenges in diagnosing gluten-sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease).

Authors:  Consolato Sergi; Fan Shen; Gerd Bouma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  An Overview of Celiac Disease in Childhood Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Iraj Shahramian; Ali Bazi; Alireza Sargazi
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-06-27

3.  Screening for coeliac disease in children and adults living in a slum of Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Amran Gazi; Subhasish Das; Mustafa Mahfuz; Md Mehedi Hasan; Md Shabab Hossain; Shah Mohammad Fahim; Md Ashraful Alam; Zannatun Noor; Carol A Gilchrist; William A Petri; M Masudur Rahman; Ramendra Nath Mazumder; Rashidul Haque; Shafiqul Alam Sarker; Tahmeed Ahmed
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-04-20

4.  SLE Plasma Profiling Identifies Unique Signatures of Lupus Nephritis and Discoid Lupus.

Authors:  Michael A Smith; Jill Henault; Jodi L Karnell; Melissa L Parker; Jeffrey M Riggs; Dominic Sinibaldi; Devon K Taylor; Rachel Ettinger; Ethan P Grant; Miguel A Sanjuan; Roland Kolbeck; Michelle A Petri; Kerry A Casey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prevalence of markers of celiac disease in Colombian children with diabetes mellitus type 1.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Velasco-Benítez; Ángeles Ruíz-Extremera; Audrey Mary Matallana-Rhoades; Sandra Carolina Giraldo-Lora; Claudia Jimena Ortíz-Rivera
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2018-12-30

Review 6.  Multidimensional Disadvantages of a Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Martyna Marciniak; Aleksandra Szymczak-Tomczak; Dagmara Mahadea; Piotr Eder; Agnieszka Dobrowolska; Iwona Krela-Kaźmierczak
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Non-celiac wheat sensitivity: rationality and irrationality of a gluten-free diet in individuals affected with non-celiac disease: a review.

Authors:  Consolato Sergi; Vincenzo Villanacci; Antonio Carroccio
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Knowledge and opinions of asymptomatic adolescents and their caregivers on celiac disease screening.

Authors:  Jasmine Blais-Carrière; Amélie Tétu; Brigitte Moreau
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Prevalence of celiac disease in Saudi children: Is it underestimated?

Authors:  Mahmood Dhahir Al-Mendalawi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.