Michelle M Mielke1, Mary M Machulda2, Clinton E Hagen3, Kelly K Edwards3, Rosebud O Roberts4, V Shane Pankratz5, David S Knopman6, Clifford R Jack7, Ronald C Petersen6. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: mielke.michelle@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The feasibility and validity of brief computerized cognitive batteries at the population-level are unknown. METHODS: Nondemented participants (n = 1660, age 50-97 years) in the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging completed the computerized CogState battery and standard neuropsychological battery. The correlation between tests was examined and comparisons between CogState performance on the personal computer (PC) and iPad (n = 331), and in the clinic vs. at home (n = 194), were assessed. RESULTS: We obtained valid data on greater than 97% of participants on each test. Correlations between the CogState and neuropsychological tests ranged from -0.462 to 0.531. Although absolute differences between the PC and iPad were small and participants preferred the iPad, performance on the PC was faster. Participants performed faster on Detection, One Card Learning, and One Back at home compared with the clinic. DISCUSSION: The computerized CogState battery, especially the iPad, was feasible, acceptable, and valid in the population.
INTRODUCTION: The feasibility and validity of brief computerized cognitive batteries at the population-level are unknown. METHODS: Nondemented participants (n = 1660, age 50-97 years) in the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging completed the computerized CogState battery and standard neuropsychological battery. The correlation between tests was examined and comparisons between CogState performance on the personal computer (PC) and iPad (n = 331), and in the clinic vs. at home (n = 194), were assessed. RESULTS: We obtained valid data on greater than 97% of participants on each test. Correlations between the CogState and neuropsychological tests ranged from -0.462 to 0.531. Although absolute differences between the PC and iPad were small and participants preferred the iPad, performance on the PC was faster. Participants performed faster on Detection, One Card Learning, and One Back at home compared with the clinic. DISCUSSION: The computerized CogState battery, especially the iPad, was feasible, acceptable, and valid in the population.
Authors: Robert H Pietrzak; Paul Maruff; Linda C Mayes; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa; Peter J Snyder Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2008-04-29 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Peter J Snyder; Colleen E Jackson; Ronald C Petersen; Ara S Khachaturian; Jeffrey Kaye; Marilyn S Albert; Sandra Weintraub Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael J Boivin; Rachelle A Busman; Sujal M Parikh; Paul Bangirana; Connie F Page; Robert O Opoka; Bruno Giordani Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Leslie M Shaw; Magdalena Korecka; Christopher M Clark; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Annie M Racine; Lindsay R Clark; Sara E Berman; Rebecca L Koscik; Kimberly D Mueller; Derek Norton; Christopher R Nicholas; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Bruno Jedynak; Murat Bilgel; Cynthia M Carlsson; Bradley T Christian; Sanjay Asthana; Sterling C Johnson Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: N H Stricker; E S Lundt; E C Alden; S M Albertson; M M Machulda; W K Kremers; D S Knopman; R C Petersen; M M Mielke Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020
Authors: Nikki H Stricker; Emily S Lundt; Kelly K Edwards; Mary M Machulda; Walter K Kremers; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Clinton E Hagen; Teresa J Christianson; Rosebud O Roberts; David S Knopman; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Walter K Kremers; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Connor T A Brenna; Beverley A Orser; Sinziana Avramescu; Andrew Fleet; Lilia Kaustov; Stephen Choi Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Jack Albright; Miriam T Ashford; Chengshi Jin; John Neuhaus; Gil D Rabinovici; Diana Truran; Paul Maruff; R Scott Mackin; Rachel L Nosheny; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2021-06-09
Authors: Christopher Fowler; Stephanie R Rainey-Smith; Sabine Bird; Julia Bomke; Pierrick Bourgeat; Belinda M Brown; Samantha C Burnham; Ashley I Bush; Carolyn Chadunow; Steven Collins; James Doecke; Vincent Doré; Kathryn A Ellis; Lis Evered; Amir Fazlollahi; Jurgen Fripp; Samantha L Gardener; Simon Gibson; Robert Grenfell; Elise Harrison; Richard Head; Liang Jin; Adrian Kamer; Fiona Lamb; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Simon M Laws; Qiao-Xin Li; Lucy Lim; Yen Ying Lim; Andrea Louey; S Lance Macaulay; Lucy Mackintosh; Ralph N Martins; Paul Maruff; Colin L Masters; Simon McBride; Lidija Milicic; Madeline Peretti; Kelly Pertile; Tenielle Porter; Morgan Radler; Alan Rembach; Joanne Robertson; Mark Rodrigues; Christopher C Rowe; Rebecca Rumble; Olivier Salvado; Greg Savage; Brendan Silbert; Magdalene Soh; Hamid R Sohrabi; Kevin Taddei; Tania Taddei; Christine Thai; Brett Trounson; Regan Tyrrell; Michael Vacher; Shiji Varghese; Victor L Villemagne; Michael Weinborn; Michael Woodward; Ying Xia; David Ames Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Rep Date: 2021-06-03