Literature DB >> 25858220

Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.

Eneko Solaberrieta1, Jose Ramon Otegi2, Nestor Goicoechea2, Aritza Brizuela3, Guillermo Pradies4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Conventional methods associated with many processes in dentistry are being replaced by methods that use digital technology. One of these processes is the making of occlusal records for the positioning of casts in a virtual articulator. Conventional interocclusal records and the articulator are being replaced by the virtual occlusal record and the virtual articulator.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to validate a virtual procedure to locate the mandibular cast in a 3-dimensional (3D) spatial position and to verify the occlusal contact points in reference to the corresponding maxillary cast on a virtual articulator.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The conventional procedure was carried out by locating 6 sets of casts in maximal intercuspal position without any interocclusal record. Then, the occlusal contacts were determined with articulating paper. Subsequently, the occlusal relationships and stone cast were digitized with a 3D scanner. The occlusal contacts were compared with photographs and by superimposing these on screenshots of the software. Finally, the deviation of discrete points on the mandibular cast was calculated, and all the points of the occlusal surface were compared point by point.
RESULTS: This study analyzed the main variables of the virtual occlusal record by using 3 current reverse engineering software packages. The results show a mean deviation of 0.069 mm from the virtual occlusion procedure and a mean standard deviation of 0.011 mm from all the points of the occlusal surface.
CONCLUSIONS: The main conclusion of this study was that the accuracy provided by a virtual occlusion procedure is greater than that of the traditional physical interocclusal record. Additionally, knowing the deviation of each alignment (best-fit operation or algorithm) is useful.
Copyright © 2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25858220     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  9 in total

1.  [Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction with the dental articulator position method].

Authors:  L L Li; Y J Zhao; H Chen; Y Wang; Y C Sun
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

2.  Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.

Authors:  Cristina Fraile; Alberto Ferreiroa; Marta Romeo; Raquel Alonso; Guillermo Pradíes
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices.

Authors:  Cristina Fraile; Alberto Ferreiroa; Marta Romeo Rubio; Raquel Alonso; Guillermo Pradíes Ramiro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Clinical occlusion analysis versus semi-adjustable articulator and virtual articulator occlusion analysis.

Authors:  Smaranda Buduru; Emilia Finta; Oana Almasan; Mirela Fluerasu; Manuela Manziuc; Simona Iacob; Cristian Culcitchi; Marius Negucioiu
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2020-07-22

5.  Reliability and Time Efficiency of Digital vs. Analog Bite Registration Technique for the Manufacture of Full-Arch Fixed Implant Prostheses.

Authors:  Philippe Nuytens; Rani D'haese; Stefan Vandeweghe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Evaluation of the Elastic Properties of Thirteen Silicone Interocclusal Recording Materials.

Authors:  Mieszko Wieckiewicz; Natalia Grychowska; Marek Zietek; Wlodzimierz Wieckiewicz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems.

Authors:  Jaime Orejas-Perez; Beatriz Gimenez-Gonzalez; Ignacio Ortiz-Collado; Israel J Thuissard; Andrea Santamaria-Laorden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Digital Quantification of Occlusal Contacts: A Methodological Study.

Authors:  Jacob Sigvardsson; Samuel Nilsson; Maria Ransjö; Anna Westerlund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Intraoral Digital Impressions for Virtual Occlusal Records: Section Quantity and Dimensions.

Authors:  Eneko Solaberrieta; Asier Garmendia; Aritza Brizuela; Jose Ramon Otegi; Guillermo Pradies; Andras Szentpétery
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.