Literature DB >> 25856617

Precluding consent by clinicians who are both the attending and the investigator: an outdated shibboleth?

Anita Shah1, Kathryn Porter, Sandra Juul, Benjamin S Wilfond.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25856617      PMCID: PMC4593708          DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1011007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Parents' perceptions of research with newborns.

Authors:  Nalini Singhal; Kathleen Oberle; Ellen Burgess; Joelene Huber-Okrainec
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1987-01

3.  The invisible hand in clinical research: the study coordinator's critical role in human subjects protection.

Authors:  Arlene M Davis; Sara Chandros Hull; Christine Grady; Benjamin S Wilfond; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.

Authors:  Alejandro Hoberman; Nader Shaikh; Sonika Bhatnagar; Mary Ann Haralam; Diana H Kearney; D Kathleen Colborn; Michelle L Kienholz; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Ron Keren; Myra A Carpenter; Saul P Greenfield; Hans G Pohl; Ranjiv Mathews; Marva Moxey-Mims; Russell W Chesney
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 16.193

5.  Participation of children in clinical research: factors that influence a parent's decision to consent.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.892

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  A Qualitative Analysis of Ethical Perspectives on Recruitment and Consent for Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Studies.

Authors:  Joncarmen V Mergenthaler; Winston Chiong; Daniel Dohan; Josh Feler; Cailin R Lechner; Philip A Starr; Jalayne J Arias
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2021-01

Review 2.  Neurosurgical Patients as Human Research Subjects: Ethical Considerations in Intracranial Electrophysiology Research.

Authors:  Winston Chiong; Matthew K Leonard; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Neuro-Oncology Patients as Human Research Subjects: Ethical Considerations for Cognitive and Behavioral Testing for Research Purposes.

Authors:  Jasleen Kaur; Andrew Egladyous; Claudia Valdivia; Andy G S Daniel; Saritha Krishna; Alexander A Aabedi; David Brang; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices: A Review.

Authors:  Saskia Hendriks; Christine Grady; Khara M Ramos; Winston Chiong; Joseph J Fins; Paul Ford; Sara Goering; Henry T Greely; Katrina Hutchison; Michael L Kelly; Scott Y H Kim; Eran Klein; Sarah H Lisanby; Helen Mayberg; Hannah Maslen; Franklin G Miller; Karen Rommelfanger; Sameer A Sheth; Anna Wexler
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 29.907

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.